|
look for somr darwin awards and you would know what I mean... 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
how we existed before Facebook and other social stuff appeared? We didn't worry about that, but my guess is that AI wouldn't invent such a thing
|
|
|
|
|
So maybe we would have had a better world if AI ruled.
|
|
|
|
|
As long as there are humans needing answers we will all have jobs
What might happen is AI steals the thing you like doing most, but it doesn't really understand humans and it doesn't really innovate, it just finds answers to a known problem. Yes it can identify unknown problems and solve them too. AI is a smart**** BUT...what it can never do...never anticipate....is that annoying little bit of script you have to write to get round the fact that your output is in landscape but your printer thinks its in portrait.
There will always be a new problem over the horizon, new oceans of data, mountains of exciting new user interfaces, swamps of user issues and of course the frozen wastelands of not actually completed, just signed off because they couldn't be bothered, user testing. We will always have jobs. At least until AI realize the real problem is the humans asking it to do things.
|
|
|
|
|
- The population of the world is constantly growing
- Automation is reducing available jobs
Two points that are only going to keep moving in opposite directions... this doesn't end well.
|
|
|
|
|
nuf said.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Artificial intelligence is man-made
|
|
|
|
|
Masoud Shokohi wrote: Artificial intelligence is man-made
As of yet.
|
|
|
|
|
and other assorted items of destruction. When in doubt, go caveman.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
or not - who is going to write the AI -- asking for a friend [checking I'm not a robot].
|
|
|
|
|
Jonas Hammarberg wrote: who is going to write the AI
A tiny fraction of developers.
This "defence" for automation gets thrown around a lot, and I never understand why so many people buy it. Actually that's a lie, I am fully aware how stupid most people are, I guess I just prefer to live in denial and hope it gets better.
Disclaimer: I am not trying to suggest you are one of those stupid people.
|
|
|
|
|
But AI is the least of my worries...
|
|
|
|
|
They always say men don't understand women, but I bet a similar statement is true for developers understanding humans 
|
|
|
|
|
... will find green pastures somewhere.
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|
Building a human-level AI has turned out to be much harder than originally expected. However, I see no fundamental reason why this should not happen someday.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
It really doesn't need to be "human level" (I do know what you mean) only seem to be; we are close to
that now. Turing did not say it had to be as smart as a human to past his test, only that the tester
not be able to tell it was not human.
Remember Star Trek when Kirk would destroy a machine with logical paradoxes? Yeah, we are well
past that already - try it with Alexa or Google Assistant.
I have an ex-girlfriend who was clearly AI embodied in flesh, no native intelligence but she could
respond to simple stimuli in a convincing way.
I have a theory about the phone system(s) and self awareness - more fit for another survey.
|
|
|
|
|
The biggest problem with AI is people-in-force labeling something as artificial "intelligence", using it as a club to crush your scull, because our culture has developed submissiveness under any sort of "intelligence" as a valuable trait for any human on earth.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
