|
Is cool??? 
It's frustrating being a genius and living the life of a moron!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Two people stated CListCtrl. Hopefully they're using the virtual mode[^] 
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
bah!
who needs that much space. I mean come on, if you cant get it all in an int, then you're trying to do too much. ;P
/bb|[^b]{2}/
|
|
|
|
|
No one is using DB2? It thought it is more popular, but seems not
|
|
|
|
|
Well, its in the top three of the text answers.
The pre-defined answers were selected a little odd, i think.
But maybe companies could book places of the list, and those who didn't had to be text answers? 
"We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation."
-- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.
|
|
|
|
|
i am using php in server side scripting now i am working local area network i have an IIS so i want to run php file in IIS.
|
|
|
|
|
How delightful for you.
 I'm sure if you write that in here[^], or read something like this[^] you'll get a better answer!
Joel Holdsworth
Wanna give me a job this summer?
Check out my online CV and project history[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the read, I found this[^] to be quite interesting...
~Nitron.
ññòòïðïðB A
start
|
|
|
|
|
I've encountered too many Unix programmers who sneer at Windows programming, thinking that Windows is heathen and stupid. Raymond all too frequently falls into the trap of disparaging the values of other cultures without considering where they came from. It's rather rare to find such bigotry among Windows programmers, who are, on the whole, solution-oriented and non-ideological. At the very least, Windows programmers will concede the faults of their culture and say pragmatically, "Look, if you want to sell a word processor to a lot of people, it has to run on their computers, and if that means we use the Evil Registry instead of elegant ~/.rc files to store our settings, so be it." The very fact that the Unix world is so full of self-righteous cultural superiority, "advocacy," and slashdot-karma-whoring sectarianism while the Windows world is more practical ("yeah, whatever, I just need to make a living here") stems from a culture that feels itself under siege, unable to break out of the server closet and hobbyist market and onto the mainstream desktop.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: He has a funny face. And he's my son.
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with that quote 1000%. I have seen so many *nix people argue, demean and stick up their noses at windows solutions that I wonder how they are still employed. Most companies want to implement a business solution that can be maintained/administered by a vast pool of potential employees/contractors, not a huge investment in a Sun or HP box, with expensive, crusty, crabby old unix sysadmins telling them "No, you can't do that" because it is not culturally correct with the beliefs of the *nix religion.
onwards and upwards...
|
|
|
|
|
Tried both ms sql and mysql but they can't stand oracle for reliability and performances when dealing with HUGE data.
|
|
|
|
|
Skunkyb wrote:
Tried both ms sql and mysql but they can't stand oracle for reliability and performances when dealing with HUGE data.
Care to expand a bit? I deployed HUGE data solutions (~2TB) on the past using SQL Server and I never had any reliability and or performance problem that I would not have with Oracle.
Actually, I deployed HUGE solutions on both databases and never had a HUGE problem that was unsolvable by properly configuring, designing and optimizing it.
I see dead pixels
Yes, even I am blogging now!
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you, although i havent setup/designed a huge Oracle db my self(i always get an OCP to do that) i've deployed fairly large quantities of data on both platforms.
I think the reason why most people say sqlserver cant handle large data is simply cause they lack the knowhow to configure and use sqlserver for large db solutions.
some men see things as they are and say why, i dream of things that never were and say why not. - Unknown
|
|
|
|
|
Agree,I have useed Oracle for four years,I also used Sql server and mysql,I do not think mysql and sqlserver can deal large data.
|
|
|
|
|
many of IT Geeks dnt know much abt ORACLE thats why i deployed it my projects,but i still new to it do little things using oracle server with inctance,there have many features,im in Database field in 4 years tired out with SQL Server and Access
|
|
|
|
|
I've been using older versions of MS SQL server (and MSDE) and Interbase, also have done some work against existing Oracle db's.
For my latest projects I've consistently recommended and used Firebird http://www.ibphoenix.com/
So far; I'm very happy with this solution - it's a tiny no fuss and really powerful RDMS - SQL92 compliant and installation requires approx 2mb + db storage.
Check it out...
|
|
|
|
|
I have also looked alot into Firebird and recommended it to a friend for his project, although I didn't use it myself.
I read in their forum that the .NET adapters are somewhat buggy. Is this true? I am not sure if the bugs only applied to beta releases or to the lastest "stable" version.
Firebird has great features that compare to MS-SQL, while combining the easy deployment of Access .MDB files. I like that!
And of course, you can turn your database in a "server driven" one (TCP/IP connection, just like MsSql or my mySql)!
|
|
|
|
|
Does it have :
1-OLEDB provider
2-GUI
???
|
|
|
|
|
As for OLEDB driver I'm not sure - most drivers can be found at http://www.firebirdsql.org/
When it comes to a GUI you have a lot of different ones to choose from both freeware and commercial, check out
http://www.ibphoenix.com/main.nfs?a=ibphoenix&page=ibp_contrib_download
This said the main focus for me is the small footprint combined with the excellent performance. This gives me the ability to rapidly and effortlessly transport the whole db or only a subset of it to a new location (or locations) either as a new server installtion, standalone or embedded.
|
|
|
|
|
sormel wrote:
This said the main focus for me is the small footprint combined with the excellent performance. This gives me the ability to rapidly and effortlessly transport the whole db or only a subset of it to a new location (or locations) either as a new server installtion, standalone or embedded.
I think this can be the MS Access alternative that i've been searching for !!!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm currently testing firebird (in its embedded version) for one my project. The whole thing is great, but it really needs a GOOD gui, 'cause everything I've used so far is either useless or expensive.
If it really wants to spread and replace MSDE in many projects, that's something the open source community has to do. Okay, most of us use the "complete SQL server" tools to manage our MSDE engines so you can say that those tools are expensive, but hey, how many of us work in companies that don't have any SQL server licence ?
Michael CARBENAY
|
|
|
|
|
I so wish we had just one database to worry about. As things stand we have MS SQL Server 2000, Sybase SQL Server 12.5 and Oracle 9i all deployed and our products integrate with them using their native APIs. So there isn't any "primary database technology"... we only work with the common features of all three... however I voted for MS SQL Server 2000 because that's what I like to work on.
|
|
|
|
|
Using MS Sql-Server (MSDE) in my application installations, but I am now considering MySQL.
Looks neat...
|
|
|
|
|
Take a version of MySQL 4.0 or above. That's all I can say about MySQL. the older versions don't have foreign keys and stuff like that.
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
