|
Wow, really? How did businesses ever succeed before DevOps? It must have all been a Grand Illusion. (cue Styx)
I'm calling BS on this propaganda article.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
By analyzing relationships between words the algorithm was able to predict discoveries of new thermoelectric materials years in advance and suggest as-yet unknown materials as candidates for thermoelectric materials. Then they came for the materials scientists, and I did not speak out (as I didn't understand the science)
|
|
|
|
|
This is what AI is for! I'm happy to learn that I'm not the only one going in this direction.
If you've ever seen an idea and thought "Hell, why did no-one think of this before!", then you know what AIs should be used for.
The crap I see every day on the 'net, about AI and what "Great Uses!" there are for AI (forgive me if I skip the buzzwords), depress the cr@p out of me. This is the first hopeful news I've seen in weeks.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
And their examples are? (Real, practical examples, not fictional predictions.)
One huge problem with this is assuming that the papers are accurate. Further, it misses the point that the papers cover the basics. The AI may suggest that we should drop Na in H2O.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Then they came for the materials scientists
I came for the source code. Data mining other software engineers seems to be my specialty. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: Data mining other software engineers seems to be my specialty. [Rose]
Who steals my code really does steal trash.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Who steals my code really does steal trash.
I believe you. There is an old proverb that states "One man's trash is another man's treasure."
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
It's like finding a needle in a haystack... but if you search every straw in the haystack you will always find the needle.
|
|
|
|
|
For researchers at the cutting edge, a certain irony has emerged: New and sophisticated instruments are starting to produce so much data that supercomputers are needed to analyze experimental results. And scientists who try to analyze such huge datasets often struggle to master the complexity of the software needed to program the hardware. Great news for the next time you work on a supercomputer
"We wanted to create a programming environment that doesn't require every researcher to be a computer scientist," says Aiken, the Alcatel-Lucent Professor in Communications and Networking. Just what I think of when I want someone to work on my multi-million dollar hardware.
modified 3-Jul-19 15:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Super Basic to the rescue?
Give me coffee to change the things I can and wine to accept the things I cannot!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
"We wanted to create a programming environment that doesn't require every researcher to be a computer scientist," says Aiken, the Alcatel-Lucent Professor in Communications and Networking. I somehow don't find it very encouraging that "the Alcatel-Lucent Professor in Communications and Networking" doesn't know the difference between a computer scientist and a computer programmer.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
GOTO the store
PICKUP the bacon
GO home
|
|
|
|
|
Now *that's* some super computing!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with pretty much all new computer languages is that the inventors fail to respect all the challenges they have to solve and which have been solved over many years by the handful of mature languages.
What is a quite deceptive is how often many of these languages rely on a massive library/framework which often work great when you things exactly the way the inventors want, but fail miserably when you depart from their golden path.
|
|
|
|
|
see: Ruby (Rails) and basically every "low code/no-code" solution, yeah.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
A study led by Brown University researchers shows that it's possible to store and retrieve data stored in artificial metabolomes—arrays of liquid mixtures containing sugars, amino acids and other types of small molecules. Needs more skatole
I'd be surprised if they don't get reactions leading to contamination of their data.The researchers used the technique to successfully encode and retrieve a variety of image files of sizes up to 2 kilobytes. What's a 2kb image these days? I'd think people post emojis bigger than that.
modified 3-Jul-19 15:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
"Anything is good if it’s made of chocolate."
Or how about "A Mars a day helps you work, rest, and look at pr0n"?
"A photo of your mother-in-law in every bite"?
"Crispy, crunchy, chewy and alexa compatible"?
"Melts in your mouth, not in your USB port"?
(I could do this all day)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That's one weird way to look thinner.
|
|
|
|
|
Phys wrote: "This is a proof-of-concept that we hope makes people think about using wider ranges of molecules to store information," said Jacob Rosenstein, a professor in Brown's School of Engineering and senior author of the study. "In some situations, small molecules like the ones we used here can have even greater information density than DNA."
Possible, yes. Efficient and applicable?
Not for a very long time 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
My wife will finally feel more computer savvy. She can now head into the kitchen and whip up a couple of hard drives for supper.
|
|
|
|
|
Data rot just got a new meaning.
|
|
|
|
|
Chronicle links the malware samples to Iran's APT33 group, which previously developed the infamous Shamoon malware. It's so rare that Outlook has a vulnerability, so worth noting
It was patched in 2017, but apparently still being targeted. Yay, sysadmins.
|
|
|
|
|
I find it fascinating how US news sites go on and on and on about Iranian-government-sponsored malware, Russian-government-sponsored malware, Chinese-government-sponsored malware, etc, but very briefly brush past the tiny fact that the root cause of most of the worlds problems with malware has been US-government-sponsored malware.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Or that a big % of the system infections are not even done by users clicking something, but delivered by googleads
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Opines that there's 'absolutely no way on Earth this was written from a clean sheet' Because it's taking away so much Windows marketshare
Yes, opinion was from 2017, but it's making the rounds now.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck to them defending code that they have overtly, openly, and many times declared as being defunct, because the "Last Ever Version of Windows!"* is a complete rewrite.
* Actually, with their twice-hourly updates to emoji libraries, icons, etc, it's become "the last several thousand versions of windows"
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
