|
I already recommended that one - great minds eh?
|
|
|
|
|
You know the rest of that, right?
But it's good to know AC++ is now available online. I did not know that. Thanks.
"A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants"
Chuckles the clown
|
|
|
|
|
It's such a good book despite its age, so I'm not entirely surprised. 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Essential C++ [Book]
Looks like not many C++ authors are updating their books, but this is a consise introduction to C++. Covers a number of important topics, but dated 1999, previous millennium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You do realize this dude is a narcissist? Yeah I know, what are the odds online... 95%?  But, if you give him an inch he's gonna be right back to asking programming questions in the lounge again. He don't care. He's playing a game to see just how weak we are.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I am well aware of what he is, but I would use a different word. I was instrumental in getting him kicked off the site for abuse a year or so ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I was instrumental in getting him kicked off the site for abuse a year or so ago.
Plot thickens. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
(curious) Does style (k&r) really matters ?
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
I've used "The ARM" (https://www.amazon.ca/Annotated-C-Reference-Manual/dp/0201514591[^]. It is very much in K&R style: only "meat and potatoes" without much "fluff".
Just like K&R, it is a bit dated now. It will serve you well to get the basic concepts but for templates and standard library stuff, you would need another book.
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Terress wrote: This is not a programming question.
It's still in bad taste given the fact you obviously can't be trusted.
Salvatore Terress wrote: Please share your actual experience and tell your opinion
Why the fudge are you bolding crap? Do you honestly think we can't tell what you mean by that?
Salvatore Terress wrote: C++ learning book ( no u-tube, PLEASE ) written in
One could argue, given who you are, this still would've been better asked in the C++ forum. What you don't realize, personally, I'll never answer a question you ask... never. And I doubt I'm the only one.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't that be,
Quote: I'll never answer a question you ask... never.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha ha... fo sho.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Never say never, Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
*lol* what now is more important...
a.) Understanding the language concept, syntax, ...
b.) Indentation style
In case you decide for b.) you should looking for another job 
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 3/6
⬛🟨⬛🟨⬛
⬛🟩🟨🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨
🟨🟨⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Doesn't look like a formal dictionary word, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6*
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜
🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 5/6
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨
🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 3/6*
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 5/6
🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜🟨
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,041 4/6*
⬛🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛
⬛🟩🟨🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Following discusses a new feature in C# which as it looks to me, just means code can be written in even more obscure ways to no point. It allows one to implicitly specify a constructor.
Refactor your C# code with primary constructors - .NET Blog[^]
I have been doing this a long in multiple OO languages and I can say for certain that I never, not even once, wished that I could write code that would mingle the constructor with a method call.
Seems like a perfect way for someone to decide to make modifications after the fact without refactoring but by trying to hack a way into using the same code.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
