Don't get confuse from the win in Gujrat, they anyway lost in Himachal. Also win in Gujrat is more over because of one man. And putting him at the forefront for LS will be tricky because there will be difference in people who saw the development and people who have about the development.
Yes, and exit poll and the discussion here were based on facts (dev, governance, security, water, power, etc.); and those doesn't come without effort - and so, the credit needs to be given to the government.
What would you think an unexpected (but required) thing about elections would be? There can not be sudden changes without indications, we know that the INC has done lot bad and should be kicked at least at quite a few places.
and so, the credit needs to be given to the government.
That is true, the kind of development he did, he should be winning.
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
What would you think an unexpected (but required) thing about elections would be?
The same what was happeining till now in India where everything else was a factor in election other than development. Be it relegion, caste, money, muscle power and even family, all of these were steps on which people were winning elections.
Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji wrote:
we know that the INC has done lot bad and should be kicked at least at quite a few places
And you think that all the places where you have an alternative government are not doing bad.
OK... who from the current team would you drop then?
Well, the most obvious candidates would be Tendular and Dhoni (keeping and batting has significantly gone down).
Here are the series batting averages for India :
Player Mat Runs Ave 100 50
CA Pujara 4 438 87.6 2 0
R Ashwin 4 243 60.75 0 2
G Gambhir 4 251 41.83 0 2
V Sehwag 4 253 36.14 1 0
MS Dhoni 4 191 31.83 0 2
V Kohli 4 188 31.33 1 0
SR Tendulkar 4 112 18.66 0 1
RA Jadeja 1 12 12 0 0
PP Ojha 4 12 6 0 0
I Sharma 2 12 6 0 0
PP Chawla 1 1 1 0 0
Kohli did not do well, but he's young and has proven his talent, so I'd keep him. I'd warn Sehwag and put him on trial for the next series - if he fails, I'd tell him that he'd be dropped at the end of the series.
Due to message costs rising to the point where people have a "booster" activated on their mobile phone plan every single time, most resort to call and get the message over than waste time or money on a message. Discuss.
I prefer calling than texting... Texting becomes a pain sometimes. I have seen many people relying on smsing during emergency. Why dont you pick up the phone and call that person. Call rates are much cheaper than messages.
Every new day is another chance to change your life.
iCall... I haven't heard someone using SMS in emergency.
There's no logic but, if someone messages you and asks you whether you'll come or where you are. You'll obviously text him and not call.
Most of teenagers and collegians use it just to finish their free SMS quota. In younger age, I used to get some 4-5 messages of that kind daily. In that scenario, you spend 'x' amount of money for 'y' messages. But company provides the plan of '<x' amount="" for="" '="">10*y' messages. So, why not go for it!? And then you'll start texting people because you need to spend '>10*y' messages.
Every body has bad habit(s). I am single guy so I don't need to text anyone. My calls usually end within the first minute(unless it is from my family). So whenever a promotional call comes I always say, don't bother me, just give me 1paise/sec that is enough. Not only that but I am too lazy to type as well
IMHO, SMSs are only for prospective couples and for those need conference calls but cannot have them for some reason. Voice messages are cooler.
The master of the art of living makes little distinction between his work and his play, his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his education and his recreation, his love and his religion. He hardly knows which is which; he simply pursues his vision of excellence in whatever he does, leaving others to decide whether he is working or playing. To him he is always doing both.