|
|
Links to the member at least would have helped...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It is newton.saber, you may understand that putting him on the Spam watch may have lead to his premature decapitation - it is spam, but he isn't a spammer IMHO.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice if every one held your sensibilities...
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: it is spam, but he isn't a spammer
How? Spammer is the one who posts the spam. There's no other definition. I'm not going to report him as we know that he didn't mean what we consider to be fired. This is debatable. Advice would suffice. Let's see.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: How? Spammer is the one who posts the spam.
Yes... and no. IMHO one who posts spam on a regular basis or as the only interaction with the communisty is a spammer thant needs to be kicked, while one that contributes and occasionally self promotes (in a very naive way I would say) should simply be warned.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: while one that contributes and occasionally self promotes (in a very naive way I would say) should simply be warned
That's the reason i stated 'we know that he didn't mean what we consider to be fired'. User requested to remove the links.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Request you to edit the post and remove the links as he has removed the offended content.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
spam[^] mer[^]
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
modified 24-Mar-15 9:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, should not be reported. Lets have a close eye. If it continues,then we will proceed further.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Cool.
|
|
|
|
|
...why this[^] account has been closed?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like moderation report. AFAIK whe someone appears in moderation queue, it is susceptible to receive a headshot
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the reason it closed by single member?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I have delivered some headshots to members in moderation when I confirmed the system guessed spam. But I don't know if that is related to my badge or anyone can/could do it (I don't know if it is still actual or not).
It was just a guess.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the profile of the person who closed that account, I fail to see how someone with such a low reputation even has the ability to headshot someone.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: But I don't know if that is related to my badge or anyone can/could do it
I don't think anyone other than protectors has access to the moderation queue.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Really? I would say I have seen people talking about spam message's moderation queue who didn't have protector status. I might be wrong though, my head is quite full of other things.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's just me who doesn't have access, then.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It was open for everyone when it started a few weeks back, but than it closed and now only protectors can see it...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Pure guess from me.
Perhaps the member has been flagged as abusive in the past and this single vote was the 10th. The reason only one member is listed as having flagged the member as abusive could be because that information was not stored until recently.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds possible. Stranger things have been seen.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|