|
|
Which part of this name (there are two IDs, the title name and the "@wannabeyourm" which is not a display name, but is still visible on the profile page), which part do you consider offensive?
Maybe it's better not to set a negative model of finding everything around offensive? There are well too many members already who tend to play offense card?
Sorry if I missed your point; in that case, please explain.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Look down his list of Comments. He's changed his name a few times. At one point, it was "Your Bitch".
|
|
|
|
|
Ha-ha, yes I saw it earlier today. Then I guess this person tried to rather offend her/himself. Other things are worse.
I just noted for myself that referring this person could be a bit awkward: Your bitch wrote… I mean, not yours… the inquirer wrote…
Today the forums are rich in real freaks (as if spamming and plagiarizing wasn't enough). I recently reported one and a bit earlier OriginalGriff reported another one…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: Today the forums are rich in real freaks
That's one way to describe them. They're certainly not developers.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point. The issue is: do we need non-engineers, non-developers here? I thin we don't. The only problem is: who can decide on that? I guess, people can be kicked off only if it becomes quite obvious, in each separate case.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the most of them don't realize that they are just hobbyists, but since they're getting a paycheck to do it they think they're doing it "for real".
|
|
|
|
|
So so and so true… Only I disagree about comparing these people with "hobbists" as offensive to hobby. There is such thing as "real hobby" which is something so much better that "professionalism" of the sort we are talking about, something nearly opposite.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
When it was reported its account name was "@ wannabeyourmilf" and its display name was "your bitch".
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
// No comment
|
|
|
|
|
Ha-ha, please see my comment above.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I gave them a little nudge a little while ago and they (promptly I might say) changed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I saw that. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
spam[^] mer[^]
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
// No comment
modified 17-Mar-15 11:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got a headshot from Sean.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam messages removed. Member needs more kicks
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore them.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, but I just wanted to bring it to attention. Sorry if you think that my report is wrong.
My account was disabled twice in a row, probably due to people of the kind (one of 10 types ); Chris had to restore it and did it promptly. This behavior becomes a phenomenon.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|