|
I know the feeling 
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure but perhaps there's also something else affecting than workload.
At the moment the site is responding well and no problems in general. However, answering the question C# appropriate menthod to store classes common data the answer didn't show up in rep history. The rep list itself displays quickly so no problem there.
==== EDIT ====
Posting this appeared correctly in rep history
|
|
|
|
|
note: JSOP posted a similar report on Jan. 6, here.
the page loads, with usable links to the usual, but, not the detailed rep data. refreshing the page with control-F5 doesn't work; ad-blocker not in use.
perhaps there's a "narcissism limiter" at work here ?
thanks, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
For me, this has been the case for years, especially during morning time (GMT +2 hours). As Chris has answered, this seems to be an issue for high-rep members since the activity list is long.
On the other hand rep history is a very handy tool to keep track on what's happening. Perhaps the amount of data being fetched could be limited? For example initially only 10 days or so, on request for longer period of time.
|
|
|
|
|
Wendelius wrote: Perhaps the amount of data being fetched could be limited? For example initially only 10 days or so, on request for longer period of time.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
We have a number of pages that display Reputation data in graph or tabular format.
On which page(s) is this problem occurring?
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Matthew,
I am aware of the graphic charts; what makes the tabular data view so useful is it allows me a quick summary of recent posting, and votes, by thread, and I can click to jump to the thread.
If you limited the tabular data to just three or four days worth of stats, it would be just as useful, to me.
cheers, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was tempted to just delete it now the member has gone but thought I'd give the hamsters a chance to have a sniff first 
|
|
|
|
|
That's nothing... today we had one with 17.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't it the same one? See the reply above yours.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nope... the one I meant was earlier today and mine was #17 so probably got more
This one I didn't report it AFAIK
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It did eventually go under. I'm digging in a little to see what the delay was.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Should the '@' character be allowed in usernames?
We all know that you should never post your email address in any forum, unless you really like spam, and that CP will automatically send you an email if anyone replies to you.
So should CP allow usernames like this: akash.[DELETED]@gmail.com - Professional Profile[^]
Given the existence of spambots, bulk mailers, and phishing, isn't it just doing part of their job for them?*
* I'm not even sure but it could fall foul of GDPR, it's personal information after all, and they are specifically included, so ... but I'm not a GDPR expert ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: it could fall foul of GDPR
I'm no lawyer, but I don't think even GDPR would cover cases where users deliberately reveal their own PII. Otherwise, you'd have to moderate every single message, to ensure that nobody posted their email address, name, date of birth, etc.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nor am I, but I'm pretty sure it's something that "no win no fee" lawyers would be prepared to argue expensively ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I'm no lawyer, but I don't think even GDPR would cover cases where users deliberately reveal their own PII.
That may be the case, Its still sticky because If I am correct, User can always says that he mistakenly entered the email in the name field and may ask where was the checks and balance from the Site?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Expensive lawyers just love little details like that!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You can't legislate for stupidity.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: You can't legislate for stupidity.
Unfortunately they can, and have done many times. Maybe you meant
You can't legislate against stupidity. 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is new, I think: An empty message moderation list with a "check all" option:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody moderated the message between the time you saw the link to moderate it and when you got to the page.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I though about that, but it persists if I wait and refresh.
If I go direct to the page via my browser history, it's still there now - and only the QA queue has items to moderate.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If navigate to the moderation page and there are no messages in moderation, then the list of messages is empty. We didn't display anything special on the page to indicate the moderation queue is now empty.
I'll add it to the bug list.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
