|
I was surfing the site when I stumbled upon Sacha's profile. In the awards and achievements list at the bottom, there are a few iterations with ":" (colon) only. I assume, they aren't awards or perhaps they are missing something. (I think they are missing the date element and the category too, just the colon, or maybe extra 4 iterations?)
Sacha Barber - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
Screenshot (2703).png - Google Drive[^]
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Currently we can format the text inside the "Describe the problem" box, but not in "What have you tried". We see OPs asking questions and putting codes in "What have you tried" without pre tags because that is not a html editor.
We, as editors, manually add the pre tags while improving the question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh ok. Thanks man. Voted.
|
|
|
|
|
The Lounge - CodeProject[^]
1 The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades
2 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades
3 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades Pinnew
4 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades
5 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades
6 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades
7 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades Pin
8 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades !!! This one is response to 6 and not 7 !!!
9 Re: The issue with auto Win 10 upgrades
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah,
I brought up the idea that figuring out the nodality of the edge is too time intensive ... last year some time. But thinking back on it now, I have mended my old dismay with two ideas.
One, I waste time there in the Lounge. So that's why it's so hard to read that left margin. So discouragment is good.
Two, I set my IE browser to dark background with light foreground usg the dimiinishing returns of the tools/internet options/general accessibilty ticks ... which is probably more responsible for this left margin disarray.
So the reason for anything to happen there is discourage ALL behaviors.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll ask Matthew to kick it
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There are lot of reposts in the QA this morning - more than the usual...
There is a bug in the posting?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
See some posts below.
When posting questions and answers an error is shown but the posts will be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew has replied to my post below (12th Mar) to say all should be ok now
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
"An error occurred while attempting to accept this answer. Please try again later." this message is coming while click the "accept solution /Reject Solution" button multiple times
once i click the "accept solution /Reject Solution" there is no response or alert messages.so i tried to accept again.
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த
நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
|
|
|
|
|
Don't: just try a refresh and you will most likely see a successful result.
|
|
|
|
|
you mean ,user has to refresh the page after accepting the solution?
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த
நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
|
|
|
|
|
Not usually but I think the hamsters are on a go-slow at the moment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edit: well, looking at the page now, it appears 3.15.3.15 is listed as being provided in March 2015. So perhaps I missed that, and the code has not been updated.
This article, by Christophe Bertrand, "UniversalSerializer," is on today's CP home page, and I'm delighted to see it there: [^]. imho, the article/code is a significant achievement that advances the "state of the art" in .NET Serialization/Deserialization !
You can figure out that the code has been updated by comparing the new download version at the top of the article page to the versions listed at the end of the article. In this case, there's no commentary in the article about what may have been changed, bugs-fixed, etc.; the version change is from 3.15.1.12 to 3.15.3.13.
This is not the first time that I've been puzzled trying to figure out whether the article text has been changed as well as the code.
If it doesn't require too great an effort on CP's part, and there's a "graceful" way to include some top-level information when an update is made, that would be most appreciated.
thanks, Bill
«The truth is a snare: you cannot have it, without being caught. You cannot have the truth in such a way that you catch it, but only in such a way that it catches you.» Soren Kierkegaard
modified 12-Mar-16 16:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
There have been several instances over the last few hours of multiple postings of the same question in quick answers. Too many for it to be a coincidence.
I suspect the members are getting an "our servers are overworked at the moment" message and just blindly trying again, but just in case this is me letting you know about it
Edit - Sorry, hadn't realised the post below Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^] was essentially the same problem
|
|
|
|
|
Yes,questions getting posted multiple times,when i try to post question there was some error messages even-though its posted, meanwhile i tried to solve the error message and keep submitting. then i see related entries as like my question title.
Member questions & answers - CodeProject[^]
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த
நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
|
|
|
|
|
And that is the problem. If you just wait a minute or two, and then look first you will probably find that the question or answer is posted successfully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this message: [^] my intent was that the 'location in the comment appeared as shown here:
widget.Location = new Point(200,200); // 'Location ... not 'location !
But, the editor insists on rendering 'location as: 'Location
Let's see if I can show that in action:
widget.Location = new Point(200,200); Uhhh ... yep, thar' she blows.
thanks, Bill
«The truth is a snare: you cannot have it, without being caught. You cannot have the truth in such a way that you catch it, but only in such a way that it catches you.» Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
|
|
|
Why would the editor even have a feature for that? That could easily lead to a lot of headaches.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: Why would the editor even have a feature for that? Hamsters !
«The truth is a snare: you cannot have it, without being caught. You cannot have the truth in such a way that you catch it, but only in such a way that it catches you.» Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
|
|
|
OK, you win the prize for the oddest bug ever.
I'm on "holidays" for the next couple of weeks but I'll try and dig into this one.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|