|
Hi, I have a problem on loading website. Assets of website can not load from cachefly website in Iran probably because of government filtering.
some screenshot:
http://uploads.im/gmbJq.png
I test it on some device and result is the same.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - this is an ongoing issue. Your country blocks (or has been blocked from) certain CDNs.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem here.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
That makes me sad. Should be fixed now, sorry about that.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Sean.
Not a big problem because we have a lot of time to vote.
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry.
Please advise.
The Enter key is pressed after ListView edit.
And I would like to move to a following line and column.
A method is not known.
|
|
|
|
|
When I'm wondering if one of my favorite authors has published a new article that I haven't noticed on the CP start page it would be convenient to be able to sort his list of articles by date of publication.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I just approved an article and the approval-counter then displayed "1". Directly after that the article got published: SQLite CRUD operation using Entity Framework 7[^]
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
modified 4-Feb-16 17:21pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Simultaneously, behind the scenes, I published the article. I'm sneaky like that.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Like this guy?[^]
On a side note, the game that is from is AWESOME.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
The "new solution" form in QA now has an additional header: "Describe the problem".
Shouldn't that be on the new question form instead?
Screen-shot of the problem[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Last time I have seen quite often what for me could be an issue.
Reported contributions where author got nuked and the article manually deleted by a protector, are still appearing as backup "auto draft" and give the possibility to continue "work on it" and being able to resurrect the item.
If you then delete the draft, the item is definitively gone.
Is it by design? Or maybe a bug?
Anyways I would suggest:
If author "don't exist" and item reported X times (a min number of reports)... if deleted by protector = definitive deletion including draft history / buffer
What do you think?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 3-Feb-16 22:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I love my daily newsletter. It's awesome. However, I'm still getting a weekly "Web Developer Newsletter" even though it's turned off in my profile under newsletters. The last one I received has this as the opening text, "Welcome to this week's Web Development newsletter from CodeProject." Is there another way to do this?
Thanks for the great newsletters and articles. They are interesting and start my day with a . Nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. It looks like it's still checked in the profile? You don't happen to have two accounts, do you?
I've unchecked it in this account.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
That's strange. I guess it's possible that I have 2 accounts for the same email, but I was looking at the login name as well. Well, I appreciate you unchecking it and I'll follow up if I still get it. Thanks for the quick reply!!!
|
|
|
|
|
As a backup, please forward the last version of the Web Newsletter you received to me - sean@codeproject.com. I will take a peek.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I posted a problem about a missing image in my article here :
Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^]
No one ever replied. Can someone look into this? The problem is still unresolved.
Thanks for any help.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it just unrio17.png? I can see it displayed when I look at the article.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I just looked at it again and you are right.
Hmm....
That is odd. When I checked the article earlier, I noticed the image didn't show.
Oh, well, it's not like these computer things are based upon science of any type.
Thanks for looking into it.
|
|
|
|
|
Because of a current occasion I want to repeat my suggestion from several month ago (which didn't get a response from the admins then):
If it's not intentional that the Moderator Forum is kind of hidden like it is I would suggest making it more visible (for the members with sufficient reputation). IMO it's near useless now. If it was more frequented already approved publications with issues could actually be reported by enough members to produce an improved revision.
In case you're concerned that publications could get reported unjustified because in contrast to member-reports in Spam&Abuse there's less of a clear cut measure, the right to post in that forum could require an even higher reputation than to read it.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Even if it's multiple hours since the message was first posted. Bug or intended?
Sidenote: Not fixed for me: Firefox does not show format options again[^]
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
modified 3-Feb-16 9:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
It was removed a while ago, you get a note at the bottom of the body.
|
|
|
|
|
Alright.
(I reported this some months ago already and at that time Chris deemed it a bug and changed it back so I thought it might be a bug again.)
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|