|
Try looking at the sign-out icon with your head not rotated forty-five degrees: it will then appear as an "x."
But, you are right, clicking on that icon does nothing: which is strange.
yrs, Bill
"What do humans depend on: words ! We're suspended in language: we can never say what's up: or, down. We must communicate experience and ideas, but in ways that do not become ambiguous, and lose objectivity.
For parallels to quantum theory: we must turn to psychology, or to paradoxes thinkers like Buddha and Lao Tzu illuminated, examining reality, as both observer, and actor, in human life's small-scale micro-cosmic drama."
Niels Bohr, 1937
|
|
|
|
|
Thats what I am asking . Why doesn't it works ? And if it not working then why it is there?
Hope this helps , If yes the accept the answer and vote it otherwise revert back with your queries
--Rahul D.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not working because it's an image. I suspect it's there as a visual representation that there is an important action there.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When I log in, I no longer see the new articles since I last logged in flagged. I've cleared my cookies and cache in my browser, etc. Any suggestions?
Best wishes,
Tom Troughton
|
|
|
|
|
Which list of articles are you referring to?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
New articles in the todolist forum were no longer being flagged when I logged in between about 12 Jan and 18 Jan. However they are back, so currently no problem.
Best wishes,
Tom Troughton
|
|
|
|
|
Ah - you mean new messages? Gotcha.
And it's fixed now? Even better!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When you bookmark a article you get a "saved" button.
This "saved" button is displayed a pixel or 2 lower than the one's next to it.
Chrome Version 24.0.1312.52 m
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed in dev. Will upload tomorrow.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Still have this, just so you know (not really that important but...)
|
|
|
|
|
I had to log in in order to see all the messages of every forum. Otherwhise there were just a very few amount of messages, soapbox 3 messages. Is it just me??
|
|
|
|
|
By default, only 10 messages are displayed. At some point you will have changed this when you are logged in, which is why you see a difference between the none logged in and the logged in behaviour.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I noticed. But to see one folder totaly empty is strange.
|
|
|
|
|
That just means no one has posted there in a while. There's a default time limit as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, last week my debator rep got instantly down to -156.
And on my profile:
Messages - 25(Under water)
Will any admin fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
There was a reputation recalculation in the last couple of weeks that "aligned" the various sources of reputation. I suspect you've been caught by this.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon did not write:"There was a reputation recalculation randomization in the last couple of weeks months that "aligned" the various sources of reputation recalculated your reputation based on a numerlogical analysis ... based on the principles of Kabbalistic gematria ... of all your posts to date. I suspect you've been caught by this. You should be honored to have been signaled out for the very special status of a negative reputation, which is of much greater value than many bloated "positive" reputations here, on such forums as Q&A. yrs, Bill
"What do humans depend on: words ! We're suspended in language: we can never say what's up: or, down. We must communicate experience and ideas, but in ways that do not become ambiguous, and lose objectivity.
For parallels to quantum theory: we must turn to psychology, or to paradoxes thinkers like Buddha and Lao Tzu illuminated, examining reality, as both observer, and actor, in human life's small-scale micro-cosmic drama."
Niels Bohr, 1937
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh Bill. You read my subtext with such grace.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, I want really you go fix my random negative reputation. I should be already with OVER NINE THOUSAND 500 points without this randomization without grace recalcution.I don't fell honred. It's like a pie in my face.
E: Also my debator reputation won't grow anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck with getting me to fix your reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I reckon you can fix it. You can fix it real good.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is down to the fact that there's nothing there that can act as a natural word wrap point. As that part is so long, it just won't wrap.
|
|
|
|
|
I think this can be done like css property as in C# (word-break: break all;).
Sisir
Software Developer
skypeID: mfsi_sisir
sisirpatro@gmail.com
08093022771
|
|
|
|
|
What you are thinking of (in CSS) is:
word-wrap: break-word; And I am well aware of this feature.
|
|
|
|