|
The ability to delete depends on your membership level. Certain site protectors have the ability to delete content while other members don't. This is largely done to prevent someone who is new to the site from running rampant and deleting content all over the place.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I am new here. I accept your logic and I shall try to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 15078716 wrote: So Ijust edited it to say that it was deleted and removed all of the question body. You should not do that, as it makes it difficult for others to make uses of any comments or answers.
|
|
|
|
|
I will try to not do that in the future.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Has it been sent out yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, there is an issue that I am looking at now.
You will get it later, I hope.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like everyone was on vacation yesterday and that for articles that would be included in the Daily Build
- the authors didn't submit anything new or update old articles
- or the moderators didn't approve any of the submitted articles
As a result, there wasn't any content for the newsletter, and it wasn't sent.
I've only seen this once before, several years ago during the Xmas break.
It was a beautiful holiday weekend here in Toronto, and I know I didn't touch my computer.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not very well educated or informed either since the Soviet Union was dissolved in December 91 so it has not existed for a bit over 30 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I'd say that's inappropriate. Thanks for catching it.
We get it, we all have our feelings on the matter, but we want to keep Politics out of CodeProject. We're all human beings no matter what from of politics we live in / under / with.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That's why we're also kicking the "Donate to Ukraine" messages, even if we may feel it is appropriate.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
There is a rose, a thumbsup and a beer as reactions to HTC's post. The popup doesn't show the rose.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: A secret admirer! Probably from the nudist colony.
|
|
|
|
|
Without digging too deeply into the code my guess is it's because the account that created that reaction has been closed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
And just look at the reactions to yours I'm replying to.
A possible clue: The first time I tried to thumbs-up it, I saw, momentarily, undefined flash up where I'd expect to see the reaction icons.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
That one has been previously reported.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: That one has been previously reported. by me....
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you know how to reproduce it!
|
|
|
|
|
That's actually logically an d physically impossible.
And yet...
(Added to the bug list but it will take us a bit to get to it: dealing with a few hairy ones right now)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed this n a C-based QA question: Why it prints the value only int is initialized?[^]
If you enter this:
int *ptr = #
Without a code block, it shows as this:
int *ptr = #
I understand that, it makes sense.
But ... inside a code block, that should be ignored, but it isn't:
int *ptr = #
To get it to work, you have to modify the code:
int *ptr = #
To get this:
int *ptr = #
I'm pretty sure that didn't used to happen? Or I'm getting old and forgetful ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh. We'll add that to the list. We have another HTML encoding issue we need to look at too.
I suspect something changed with the HTML sanitiser we were using. I can't see how it could have, since we dictate the rules it uses, but after an upgrade we've seen a couple of issues.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In message / QA moderation, links are highlighted in Yellow.
Would it be possible to add a toggle for that to article moderation so we could switch it on and off? Just thinking it would make some of the spam easier to spot - for example when it's empty, or just a "." at the end of a sentence.
For example: Difference Between pip and pip3 in Python[^] - yes, it's garbage as an article, but the spam link is the first word of the third sentence / paragraph, and it's hard to see (it slipped past Greg for example). Having a yellow background toggle in moderation woudl make it so much easier for everybody!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I could wrap the links in the blink tag...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Argghhh! My EYES!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|