|
Could this please remember the last settings I used? At the moment it always comes up with teh options set:
Search
X Everything
X Articles
X Technical Blogs
X Tips & Tricks
X Reference Articles
Research Library
Questions
Answers
Forum Messages
News Items
Just My Stuff
My Bookmarks And it does a re-search eveytime you add or remove an option.
If you select just "Forum messages" it would be nice if it remembered that next time.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Look down a ways on the left for Saved Queries. You can save the current search query by name and then click on it to re-execute.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not talking about running the same query again - just saving the "search here" locations.
That way, if I want to find a Lounge message, it doesn't do five or six postbacks (and thus five or six unwanted searches using your valuable server time) to "limit the range".
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What about the "search within" dropdown in the search box? Does that help?
[edit: I've found a bug. Searching from the forum search box is meant to already limit it to messages. It doesn't]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
And I don't see a "Search Within" dropdown:
I have the "Search" checkboxes, a "Sort by" drop, two "Match" drops, a "Rating Range" drop, and a "Saved queries" textbox. Other than that, there is just the "Advanced Filters".
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Top-right of every page (except the search page)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If you search using the forum search box (top right just above the forum) then it pre-selected just forum messages now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Could we have a checkbox and a global "these are all spam" button?
There are 33 from the usual suspect in there at the moment, and it takes a while to prune it down, since every "delete" click requires a page reload, which is about 4 seconds or so.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
This is just the first crack at this page.
I was thinking of using some AJAX magic to update the page without post back. Then there would not be the need for check boxes. Click, it's gone, and the list gets updated asynchronously.
|
|
|
|
|
That'd work. Pretty well, in fact.
Still be nice to be able to say "All of these" when they are clearly from the same author, and all give the same telephone number
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that some of the advice given for using the Article Editor doesn't seem to work on the OFFLINE version of it. For instnace, there's no "Language Dropdown", "'Var' Button", or panel for uploading files. What's up with all that--and how should I deal with it, in the event I want to be able to work on an article offline?
Robert Gustafson
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Gustafson wrote: What's up with all that
What offline version of the article editor?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think he means this one[^], but that's not owned by the CP team.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Version 1.0.4.0. Is there a more recent one?
|
|
|
|
|
If you mean this editor[^], then please post your request at the message board of the article. This message board is only for bugs and suggestions about the site, and that editor is not owned by the CP team.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
I think there are still something that needs attention in spam filters. Currently, after reporting users many posts as spam, his account is not getting disabled. e.g. http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11380041[^] is still alive at the time i am posting this even after reporting his almost 15 posts.
And even some of the question got listed in QA.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
He's gone now. Marked as closed after 10 reports, including details of who did it.
Nice!
|
|
|
|
|
The spam filter appears to be doing a damn fine job!
I know they are still trying - they keep showing up in the "moderated possible spam" list - but I haven't seen any new ast*rol*ogy spam in QA at all today.
What ever you did, it was good, and worth doing. Nice one!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they just issued one of these[^] so some Outlaw programmer and let him loose
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, BFG[^] along with the chain saw, because it's just fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Chainsaw + Pinkies = fun and 0 ammo used
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, he gets man-points for that.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
He gets man points for a lot of things he has done.
Turbo Nutter B*st*rd points for most of them too...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank Matthew. He did the heavy lifting and spelunking to get this going.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|