|
I noticed the same, but it looks like it only happens if your report is the last report necessary to delete the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: it only happens if your report is the last report necessary to delete the answer.
Yes
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My report was the second one and the answer was still there after reporting.
The answer is gone now and the list shows probably the name of the last one who reported because that name does not occur as poster or editor.
|
|
|
|
|
With almost every (every new) article there is a problem of missing images. It seems to me a problem of the submission wizard...
[edit]
Just spotted that after posting a comment on the article the images are show, but page refresh do not help...
[/edit]
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure ProgramFOX already nailed it here[^].
Just like you mention in your edit, I have found that once you post a message in the Comment section, you get redirected to the actual revision that is up for moderation - you can see the URL change in the address bar.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that he talks about the content of the moderation queue - that it contains already approved and still editing articles (that was also reported a few times in the last weeks). But I'm talking about the images inside an article...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that is because the images are in a temporary subfolder and are moved to the article folder once the article is approved. The article link in the queue is the URL the article will have once it is approved and there, the images are expected to be in the article folder.
I am sorry if my explanation is confusing, but I believe it is correct.
To confuse matters even more, you will occasionally come across a brand new article in the queue where the images are showing up just fine (such as this one[^]), but that seems to be because the article links to off-site images.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I think I got you, after all...
But to summarize it - we are in trouble...I reported about 10 articles as 'Missing images' because of that, so maybe we have to send some seeds out to Canada...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to redirect them to Australia. I'm on the other side of the planet this weekend.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
And you took the poor hamsters with you!? How cruel of you!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I am with you on this one, good spot from M.ProgramFOX.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I've just gone through every article in the pending queue and all images are in place. Dammit.
I'm keeping an eye on the issue and, assuming I can spot it happen in the next day or so, should have a fix out.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It happening only for new article that really need approval. But in the queue there are also articles that already approved or still not published...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
It looks like you have fixed the problem with the Moderation Queue (I hope my "article" helped), but it is not 100% fixed. It works correctly on Web02, Web03 and Web04, but Web01 is still exhibiting the bug.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Nice sleuthing.
I kicked that server a while ago and it seemed to do the job.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. It seems to work for me as well.
It was just one of those WTE moments where I checked the list and saw a blue (unvisited) link in the middle of the list after I new I already had looked at all of them. I remembered how @Nelek used to report cache synchronization problems with some of the servers, so I decided to Refresh a few times to check it out.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Web site hang when past text. tested on Chrome and Firefox, both having same issue.
Look at life through the windshield, not the rear-view mirror
|
|
|
|
|
It should be good now. We were doing an upgrade at the time you posted.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That issue is not because of upgrade. I face this issue almost everytime i paste something. I type everything now a days.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps I simply missed this in a newsletter, but I just noticed that the voting form for the articles now has radio buttons instead of check boxes.
Is it intentional that we can only vote for one article in each category now?
I looked through the posts in this forum, but did not see any mention of this change.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why isn't there PHP in codeproject main menu, while it's more popular than existing options?
|
|
|
|
|
The menu lists the most popular items by posting frequency
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Although we don't see much spams in CodeProject, there is this one black magic expert who is really getting on my nerves.
Every other day, I see he posts half a dozen messages in a short span of time.
I understand that it's difficult to built a perfect spam detector but would it a be good idea to prevent some one to post only a certain number of questions in a time-window.
So for e.g. I should be limited to post only 1-2 questions in a span of 15 minutes.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|