|
|
I've checked them and they seem fine,
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see images in that article (rather, I see broken images).
Also, I don't see comments in that article (probably related to that article not being approved yet, or something like that).
|
|
|
|
|
Link on a modified article in moderation queue and it goes to the published version with message Quote: There is a version that is ready for approval by the community. Would you like to view or edit it?.
Also noticed several articles in the queue with "This is an old version of the currently published ..."
|
|
|
|
|
From the list of WORKSPACES that detail my downloading behavior
|
|
|
|
|
- Go to the Workspace that you want to delete.
- Go to "Edit workspace settings" by clicking on the gear icon.
- Click on the "Delete this workspace" button and confirm that you want to delete it.
|
|
|
|
|
done, done, done, done ... except for the latest.
This one's different because there's no gear to access the DELETE button after I get to a project page.
Anyone know why some stuff's different from other stuff?
(thanks PFOX)
|
|
|
|
|
That's strange. Can you please provide a link to the article where you have downloaded the source?
|
|
|
|
|
The "Report" flag doesn't appear on messages in the Bugs and Suggestions forum. This means that we cannot report spam here.
modified 30-Apr-14 8:10am.
|
|
|
|
|
If I click on the Startpage (just plain http://www.codeproject.com/[^]) in the Latest Article section on the filter for C# this gives a nicely filtered list of articles and tips.
If I now switch over to http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/List.aspx?tab=active[^] a filter gets applied: "C#, C#3.5, C#5, C#1.0, C#2.0, C#3.0, C#4.0". Even if there was a filter previously set for Q&A questions.
Ist this an intended "feature"? As far as I can see the filters aren't connected to each other directly. (That means, I can reset the filter in the Q&A manually and am able to see all questions again, but the "Latest articles" list is still filtered by what I originally selected there (e.g. "C#")). And is there a way to "prevent" the site from overwriting the Q&A filter?
Also an interesting side effect: If you select "C++" in the article and follow the quick link to the C# questions in the Q&A you get no results because "Sorry, no entries were found matching tags C#, C++, C++/CLI, C, VC6, VC7, VC7.1, VC8.0, VC9.0, VC10.0, VC11.0, VC12.0"
A better way in my opinion would be to separate those filters from each other. But those preselection isn't really bad for Q&A either. So a quick way to find only e.g. Android questions would also be nice. Why not change the list with the 5 most used tags under the "quick answers" menu to a menu that contains those predefined filters. In addition I'd suggest that if you open the Q&A page through those direct links the custom filter should not be applied (except the "Ignored" tags)
|
|
|
|
|
OK, there is a glitch in the matrix. In the last few days, a lot of submitted articles have been approved of without having a content worth of it ( Check the moderator forum, I am not the only one to think so).
How many people are allowed to approve articles ? I suspect some reputation points harvesting by some users is going on (=with that I mean approving without even checking properly the content).
I have already pointed out in an earlier thread that the rep points requirements for being privileged to moderate publications are too low (should be single based on the status of Author or Authority IMO). I reckon that even I should not be allowed to moderate articles (no Author points, low Authority).
Would it be possible to modify the privileges for limiting the people allowed to approve articles ?
Would it be possible to publish (for editor only) the name of the people approving articles, so that we can debate about their opinion concerning the article content ?
Thanks.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: lot of submitted articles have been approved of without having a content worth of it Just that! In the last week or so I saw a lot of 'article' I reported as 'Wrong type' and saw after an hour as approved, while it's obvious it's not an article...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hm. No issues with Chrome 34
(Although the URL looks a bit strange with that "HowplustoplusUseplusSSHplustoplusAccessplusaplusLi" at the end )
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe those Net Nazis again.
Nicholas Marty wrote: HowplustoplusUseplusSSHplustoplusAccessplusaplusLi
that intrigues me too. Maybe a replacement for "+"?
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
Ah... I see the images aren't hosted on CP servers. Maybe this is causing the issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. My thoughts exactly.
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
I've been seeing a lot of that ... even swapped browsers but still got the issue. Went to inform OP on one article and they "magically" appeared!! CP servers might be under some stress ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it... it's currently third from the bottom in my (default) view...
|
|
|
|
|
sorry sir.i Couldn't see it
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
Be that as it may, it's definitely there!!
|
|
|
|
|