|
Looks correct here with Chrome Version 78.0.3904.108
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
No issue on FF 70.0.1 64-bits.
Have you tried to Ctrl-F5 to bypass your cache?
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
phil.o wrote: Have you tried to Ctrl-F5 to bypass your cache? Just did, and nothing
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All look fine to me. Your badge is correctly shown as protector.
|
|
|
|
|
Weird... I'll check later in the other pc
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem at home, two different browsers
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I still see you as a Protector.
|
|
|
|
|
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The image was correct on our web servers, but not in source control.
I did a complete deploy, rather than a differential deploy yesterday, so the image got overwritten.
I've corrected the source and this will be corrected after the next deploy AND the browser caches expire or refresh.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Glad that you found it
Just curious about why such a selective result? I was affected in two different systems in all my different versions of browsers, while other people wasn't.
But nothing that will disturb my sleep, so you can't just go by, whistling and doing as you didn't read my "Just curious about..."
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The image is cached by the browser, so until the cache expired or was refreshed, the old correct version was shown. Anyone who had to get the image from the server would have gotten the wrong one.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Makes more sense than I had expected
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I find that if you don't understand a bug enough to be able to explain it simply to someone else, then you probably didn't actually fix it completely.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Dennis wrote: I find that if you don't understand a bug enough to be able to explain it simply to someone else, then you probably didn't actually fix it completely. See the 2nd sentence in my signature
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I can see the title, the moderation box, but nothing below.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem here. No left-hand menu either.
Firefox 70.0.1, all ad-blockers and tracking protection disabled for CodeProject.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser are you using? I'm still seeing the problem in Firefox, and I'm seeing the same behaviour in Chrome v78.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Google Chrome 78.0.3904.97, and it still shows the complete article. Are you sure it's not an adblocker issue?
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox 70.0.1 64-bits here. And all ad-blockers are deactivated for the whole CP site.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried Firefox on my wife's system, and can also see the complete article there. This is quite weird.
|
|
|
|
|
All I can see in web console is this warning:
This site appears to use a scroll-linked positioning effect. This may not work well with asynchronous panning; see https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Mozilla/Performance/ScrollLinkedEffects for further details and to join the discussion on related tools and features!
All was well until today, and I did not update Firefox for more than one week now.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
As I said, all ad-blockers and tracking protection is disabled for CodeProject.
It's not specific to an article; there's a different one in the queue now which has the same problem.
Looking at the page source, there's nothing in there other than the moderation form and the adverts.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: there's a different one in the queue now which has the same problem. Sorry to say this, but no problem for me.
[edit]
And I can see all in the page source.
[/edit]
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's because you're a "protector"?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|