|
You can remove it by yourself:
- Hover over your account name (on the top right corner of the page)
- Select "My Settings"
- Navigate to "Privacy" tab
- Select the options you want to use
|
|
|
|
|
But I don't know how...
Can someone please help me?
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
modified 27-Sep-18 20:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Check your email - particularly the "Junk" folder. Have you had a verification link sent to you?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried to search for articles. Search Argument: "join".
No results, is it me or is it CP?
Note: Using Google with "explain sql joins code project" lead me to my favorite article Visual Representation of SQL Joins[^]
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like the database might be struggling. None of the drop-down lists are populated either.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for confirmation. I'm relived, this time it seems not to be my mistake
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well that was an interesting one.
We've been rationalising our internal DNS and trimming our hosts files and two conflicting changes made the search servers unavailable. To add to the confusion we currently have 4 different search clusters in operation (each with 3 servers) while we test OS and search server upgrades.
I've wired search back up to the latest and greatest code on the latest and greatest servers but at this stage perf isn't great. I've asked the network guys to reinstate our new code / old server setup given that we think it's a Server 2016 issue that's killing perf.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your detailed Feedback. You marked it as fixed, but unfortunatelly for me it Looks still the same (Chrome & ie). [Edit]This Screen shot taken after search for artciles, startet from "cp-home":[Edit]
Start search from CP-Home: Works now.
Start search otherwhise gives this:
Everything seems to work now better. But then and when still broken.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The search works for me...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your Feedback. Checked it just again...
When start searching from CP-Home: It works.
When start searching e.g. from reading your message: Search does not work.
Now it works
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm noticing some load issues with our search server and am talking to our guys now about getting things sorted.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When I search QA I do so with tags set up and about 10% of the time I get the threads, but the rest of the time I get "Sorry, no entries were found matching tags <my tag list here>". More basic searches like view unanswered etc tend to work all the time.
It's been like this for maybe three days.
|
|
|
|
|
There are indeed issues with searching, as I could not get any results today, and also yesterday … (I use Win10 Pro + Firefox or IE11). The search page remains silent after sending a query, and there are no problems with anything else …
BR,
|
|
|
|
|
I've switched this back to "In Progress". We'll get this sorted.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the update … The search page works now, I think much faster than before. There are no problems anymore
BR,
|
|
|
|
|
At the Moment it is incredible fast and delivers meaningful results.
Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I was about to file this as a bug report
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Impossible" is a strong word - you can always use the browser developer tools to find the link[^].
But yes, the bug is quite annoying.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I tried... but didn't have enough patience to find the ID
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We're in the middle of refactoring our entire user/member system to fix a whole raft of issues like this.
Getting close.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
While we're waiting for Chris to fix the missing/blank usernames, I've found a temporary workaround, which doesn't seem to break anything else.
- F12 to open the developer tools;
- Switch to the console, if it's not already active;
- Paste in:
$("a[href]:empty").each(function(){ $(this).text(this.getAttribute("href")); }); - Enter;
- ???
- Profit!
You'll need to do this on each page load, unless you want to turn it into a Greasemonkey / Tampermonkey script.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I'll give it a try. Also, in Chrome you can just use the "Inspect element" item in the context menu, and get the full address from the page source.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if the "approved by" list still works correctly. For example this one Easily apply sorting for DataTables in C#. Last time I looked at it (earlier version) it didn't contain any explanations so I decided to vote for unclear/incomplete, or at least I meant to.
Perhaps there are still some oddities in listing approvals?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello admins
have you ever seen this? codeproject.com passwords - BugMeNot[^]
yes. that's a website where people can share login details of fake accounts for others so they don't have to register themselves. this account itself is an example
but this is dangerous. you get 2 reputation for every download. these accounts on bugmenot get pretty much attention and downloads. i once saw one of them with platinum organizer. no good! because what if spammer uses one of these accounts to circumvent spam check? or abuse privileges in other way.
i once sent a removal request to bugmenot for CP. but no luck. i hope admins can fight harder than i. thank you
|
|
|
|