|
Currently I'm posting the spammers/abusers details in Spam & Abuse forum. To report spammers/abusers how much points I need(In which category)?
There is no information in Rep.FAQ[^] about this. Found only this Vote to remove messages: Bronze Debator
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot say for sure, but the best thing is just keep contributing and when you do eventually earn the right you will see a Report Member red flag at the bottom right of the member profile you are wanting to report.
On another note.......do you not think the whole "Chuck Norris" thing has been done before, and maybe you can find your own handle, or here is an idea, why not just use your name 
|
|
|
|
|
I do agree with that, no need to use an artificial name unless there is a need to hide behind it.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Sheila,
Glad you agree
|
|
|
|
|
Sheila?
Do explain!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
It was just a random name that popped into my head.
Manfred R. Bihy just sounds too regal to be your real name and must be cover........
|
|
|
|
|
Not always true - I use OriginalGriff because when I joined Griff, TheGriff, Griffin, TheGriffin, PaulGriffin, etc., were all taken.
Since I couldn't get my real name, I used the closest I could get.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
But you are not hiding behind your screen name, that was I meant.
Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: I cannot say for sure, but the best thing is just keep contributing and when you do eventually earn the right you will see a Report Member red flag at the bottom right of the member profile you are wanting to report.
I want only to hunt spammers/abusers & improving Q/A section questions.
DaveAuld wrote: On another note.......do you not think the whole "Chuck Norris" thing has been done before, and maybe you can find your own handle, or here is an idea, why not just use your name
You people like names such as AspDotNetDev, DeathByChocolate, Slacker007, etc., but not Chuck Norris? 
Thank you.
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
You make a valid point, but at least their nicknames are original.
Chuck Norris is very Chapeau Ancient
---------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
English League Tables - Live
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no.... But I like mine.
Anyway suggestions welcome, give me good nick name(s), I'll change it later. After that I have to change my profile picture too
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Nicknames are usual earned.
You must have had some over the years.
I have had; Shuggie, Bertie, Foghorn, Binary, BertronGasho and probably a few others that I can't remember. I am sure there are a few at work I don't know about as well, although Angry Boss was christened a few weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: You must have had some over the years.
Mostly sarcastic 
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Have you considered DogVomitSlimeMold? When I signed up, I was really torn between that and AspDotNetDev.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm glad at least you didn't tell me to put that for my profile picture.
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Chuck Norris' account doesn't have a Report Member flag. Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks members off the site. Without even needing to login.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Chuck Norris' account doesn't have a Report Member flag. Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks members off the site. Without even needing to login.
Hope my fans will add this into this list[^]
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Total reputation of a member and color of member level (silver, gold etc.) is displayed at the answer. I think if the reputation under Authority (answering questions) category with the member level under this category is also given then immediately one can have an idea about the member with regard to answering the questions.
like 6.1K/25K
Sometimes, I have observed that a member having silver under participant category (which I think is somewhat easy to obtain as 400 points are awarded for sign up and opting for news letters and then 5 points are given for voting a survey), will be displayed in silver color, whereas his reputation under Authority is bronze with less points.
|
|
|
|
|
ProEnggSoft wrote: which I think is somewhat easy to obtain as 400 points are awarded for sign up
No, only 100 points 
I didn't subscribe newsletters.
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Chuck N0rris wrote: I didn't subscribe newsletters.
You should in my opinion. The newsletters aren't intrusive, they're rather quite informative and well designed, and you're supporting the site as they contains some ads.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. But I don't check mails frequently. Anyway I'll subscribe to support the site.
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Im not sure about this... for instance members like myself have built up points under author and so I am shown as gold. However, while I don't answer lots of questions, when I do people seem pretty happy with the answer. So what I'm saying is that your idea may introduce a level of disregard for lower level members even if they are very good answers...
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
Agree with you. If I answer a question my participant points will show me as bronze member in Q/A section.
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I partially agree with you here in the sense that I believe the current showing in a QA answer of the total reputation is not useful: it's even mis-leading.
Why do I say mis-leading ? ... because total rep includes Lounge rep Points, which I consider to be within CP the equivalent of a plague of locusts on a Kansas cornfield 
imho, the only thing that should be shown in QA answers is reputation as Author/Expert/Scholar/Authority: and color: do you really need color here ? Simpler is better ?
best, Bill
"Every two days we create as much information as we did from the dawn of civilization up until 2003". Eric Schmidt of Google.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, blabber points make total reputation meaningless as a measure of technical know-how.
In fact I suggested long ago to somehow represent the combined Author+Authority points where answers/discussions are viewed; for the same reasons, my CP Vanity app can show total rep excluding Debator points.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
