|
Great. You should report it as still alive sock puppets in SA.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
There's a space in the second username. But yes, odds on it's the same person.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
But not in the permalink to the user. Look under the "Member since" line, and you'll see the same link for both users.
They also have the same "@" name under the display name.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
When I go to:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=141926&aid=821999[^]
I get the message:
This article is not currently available for viewing.
And:
Closed because This post is spam, abusive or otherwise inappropriate. Reported by ... (3 names) on Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:46am.
But below that I still get the full article.
If the article is closed / not available for viewing / ... shouldn't I not be able to see it?
Or is it a reputation thing? (I really wouldn't know why I would be able to see it as I have 0 author points)
|
|
|
|
|
You can see it because of your privileges to approve articles...
The content is visible only for those have that privileges and the reason is to enable debate over others decision...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm k, figured it might be something like that.
Just thought I'd point it out in case it was a bug 
|
|
|
|
|
This article has been reported for abuse, and, I think, for a good reason. All members can see the "not available for viewing" message, but some members can view it (if you are interested in my opinion, I'll tell you: it's not worth viewing anyway .
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: it's not worth viewing anyway
I know, I can see it.
And that was my point, it didn't seem logical that I am able to still see the article.
I can understand that you can view it, or anyone else who has written an article (or more) since you yourself are a "writer" and hence (presumably) know what constitutes a good article.
I on the other hand have never (to my regret, because of lack of time and writing skills) written an article so in my own opinion should not be able to "judge" somebody else's work, yet I can still see it.
K granted in this case even I could (and would) have reported it.
Anyway not worth going on about to much, it seems it's intentional so there's no problem
|
|
|
|
|
Today I had a bad experience while coping URLs...The two URLs below created wrong link and somehow I was unable to fix them even manually...
1. http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html
<a href="http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html">
http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html
</a>
[<a href="http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
2. http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion
<a href="http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion">
http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion
</a>
[<a href="http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
I know. The <a> tag looks perfect, but visually you got only this: ^] with a wrong link...
[EDIT]
Found that also links that were in order at the time of posting now went wrong...
http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=4908335#xx4908335xx[^]
[/EDIT]
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 23-Sep-14 8:37am.
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed in Firefox 32.0.2:
http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html[^]
http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion[^]
Content in the textarea:
<a href="http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html">http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html</a>[<a href="http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
<a href="http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion">http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion</a>[<a href="http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
Generated output in the preview:
<a href="http://www.safaribooks>http://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/bootstrap/9781449344573/ch01.html</a>[<a href=" http:="" www.safaribooks="">^</a>]<br>
<a href="http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-c>http://www.rayvatbpo.com/gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-conversion</a>[<a href=" http:="" www.rayvatbpo.com="" gaining-the-edge-by-pdf-to-excel-c="">^</a>]<br>
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Please see my other comment. It also happens when you try to manually write HTML...
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
The problem appeared exactly today. I know that, because it happened during posting of one my solution: first part with one link worked correctly, but adding two more links screwed up them in all next versions trying to work around it.
In addition to what you said, it you correctly add a link manually in HTML text, it can be screwed up when you added it.
Probably this work-around still works: If you edit a whole post in a separate editor and past is "as is", it still works. The key here is: in this case you include some text outside the anchors; it effectively switches off the flawed algorithm". I'm not 100 sure yet; please try.
[EDIT]
No, my work-around described above does not work anymore. Sorry. We badly need a fix on the site code.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, but only seems to be in QA. Forums seem to be OK.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Really? Hope it's the transition period; all tools should better work in the same way.
Thank you for the note.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I take that back. Forums also seem to have the problem.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
yep, its broke. I'll get on it. Shouldn't let Chris 'fix' things just before he takes some time off.
|
|
|
|
|
Please also note that I also tried to work around it by providing equivalent anchors in the comment to the answer. The anchors was screwed up, too.
Some links in the answer post came out correctly after the post, and others, apparently looking of the same type, were screwed up. I failed to spot the difference.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I unsubscribed to the Daily Build Newsletter yesterday, but still got a newsletter today.
Brgds
Jonas
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please forward me (chris@codeproject.com) the newsletter you received? Was it the Daily Build or a different newsletter?
If you only recently unsubscribed you have unsubscribed after the newsletters for today had already started sending. In any case I've checked your account and you're not subscribed to any newsletters so please let me know if you get any further newsletters.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, already deleted it. I'll just see if it shows up tomorrow again, and then I'll get back to you.
|
|
|
|
|
The tip ng-bind vs {{ }} in AngularJs[^] was in moderation and I voted 1 with a comment. While posting the comment it got updated by a CP-Editor and then my vote was vanished.
Does editors' edit have a rollback function or similar? Or was it just because of the "simultan" actions?
Just curious. I don't mind about my vote, the comment is still there.
Edit:
I just noticed that after that edit it got automatically approved and is not in the approval list anymore.
Might be that the high-reputation of the editor just got it published without moderation?. Or is that supposed to be like that?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Approvals require a fixed number of approves, or a single admin.
Comments on pending items are attached to that version. On edit, those comments stay with the previous version. This ensure we don't have tons of "you have broken images" messages on articles.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
http://bugmenot.com/view/codeproject.com[^]
CodeProject user accounts on the open!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, not quite. These are all fake accounts that have been created.
|
|
|
|
|
But you can login with them...May the hamsters should kick them out...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
