|
Created specially for the occasion (and that shows CP does accept Ten Minute Mail addresses) and chucked straight in the sack with a couple of house bricks! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for the detailed instruction.
"Once you deactivate your account you will lose access to your posts, articles and data." Select "OK"."....does it also mean my Posts etc. will also disappear in the CP database, in the sense of also other cannot see them anymore?
Strange Bruno english, I know 
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure... Only the admins can tell you that for certain.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As I understand it: Lose access to, and disappear isn't the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
in my newly submitted article:
[^]
the code and image links are broken.
This happens now the third time after submitting a new article. What do I do else than others?
Thanks
Edgar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. I am doing it as in your last link. In the article editor is looks OK, also the links are OK, relative to the article URL.
-> But as soon as I publish the article, all links show broken.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, if I look at your article Kinect Point Cloud using OpenGL [^] I can see all of the images just fine. As you said they were not visible a short while ago.
Just a guess but could there be a delay (because of cache refresh interval?) that would cause a short period when the images are not visible just after publishing?
|
|
|
|
|
No, Chris Maunder from the support fixed the article.
Thanks, Chris, btw
|
|
|
|
|
I did not get to see precisely what was wrong initially, but this is a complaint I hear from time to time. Sometimes I think it may be a server issue, where you uploaded your images and they simply they haven't spread across all servers yet.
The other possibility is the images have the wrong path. If you add your images when the editor is in the WYSIWYG mode you would add them using the little arrow button, shown here:
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
If you want to add your images using the HTML mode in your article they would look like this:
<img src="861867/1._All.PNG" />
The same would be true for the file paths.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Sean. For me it sounds like it is possibility 1, as the path of the images were OK, which was confirmed by the support.
What is the best way to get a fast support next time? Is there some email list I can address this when it happens again?
(It happened all 3 times I submitted an article, last time I got some 5 complaints of users who could not download code/ or see the images).
Thanks,
Edgar
|
|
|
|
|
If you're having issues like this, write your article offline and submit it to CodeProject via email. There are details on how to do this here[^]. You'll avoid all these issues by doing this.
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretically I am the best / fastest. sean[at]codeproject.com But I'll level with you: Sometimes I sleep at night 
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Blinking does not count as sleeping Sean.
|
|
|
|
|
My blinky power naps are legendary, sir.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
If you have problems with the articles, then you can ask in http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1641/Article-Writing.aspx[^]
People there know the editor and can help.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
There's only one forum in there now. The plural is redundant.
|
|
|
|
|
The pluralisation has been kept to future-proof it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have a carton of eggs. Turns out there is only one egg in it. It's still a carton of eggs.
OK, back to work. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
You have two dogs. One dies. Do you still have dogs?
|
|
|
|
|
But you're referring to the container not the contents. If I had 2 dog houses, and one dog dies, I still have 2 dog houses.
Just messing with you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It offends my OCD though. In this case, he has one dog house that used to contain two dogs, and it now only contains one dog.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: In this case, he has one dog house that used to contain two dogs
No. Then it would have been Feature Forum with 2 forums. He had dog houses.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I know he's in the dog house for not changing it 
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting syntactical question. I think the answer is "it depends":
If we define "have" in the narrow terms of "currently own" then it depends if you still own the dead dog. Even if Rover has been interred somewhere, is he still technically your property? If we define it more broadly "[from time-to-time] I have dogs" then the plural stands (and possibly sits, stays and does "paws").This is a bit like me saying I foster dogs. Usually I don't foster multiple animals at the same time, and at the moment I have no foster animals. However, the statement "I foster dogs" is still a reasonable one to make.
I guess if the target is never going to own another dog AND he no longer possesses his deceased best friend than it should be singular.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
