|
With some very limited experimenting it would seem like that removing a message that have had some subsequent action happening to it such as a response or a vote will only exchange the subject and message for a standard text.
I could be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
I've just checked - the message has disappeared, but my points have not been modified (at least - nothing appears in the reputation events log).
The thread is in the C# forum, 'Threads vs. Tasks Article', started on 18-Feb-2015 at 7:03. I deleted my message a few minutes before the start of this thread.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Add a way for CP members to endorse each other in terms of skill-set/ability. Weighted reputation points would be earned for each endorsement (like article voting is weighted by reputation of voter). Allow the voter to leave a short comment regarding his/her vote. Other users should be able see who you endorse, and who endorses you. It might be useful to see the date of the endorsement as well.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Do you want to be my CP-friend ?
(I'm already out, don't ask me to leave)
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see this one, John. I think the reputation system now reflects "endorsement" of the only meaningful kind we can possibly do given the fact that for most of use face-to-face verified knowledge of other people's skill-sets, outside the technical, is limited to the few members, on average, that most members know "personally."
I might be able to have a fairly objective view of someone's depth, and knowledge, and achievements, in writing code, but how could I know how that might "map" to other aspects of their character, behavior, ability to work in a team, etc., etc.
Yes, I think the rep-system here is flawed, and can-be- and is- gamed, by some, but, so is every other rep system anywhere in the netiverse 
But, yeah I would hire you to organize getting my Mustang hot-rodded, if I had one.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
It was just an idea to get more people involved with the site.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
So: LinkedIn, then?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Linked-In allows my not-so-sane sister to endorse me for skills which she can't possibly be aware of. She's nowhere close to being knowledgable about what I do.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
She doesn't ask, you don't tell, family harmony ensues.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually it was a platinum member who kicked you. The same platinum member who has done this a number of times.
I'll make a change that will remove his ability to report. It's happened too many times.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Is this the reason Bruno is gone?
|
|
|
|
|
Seems most unfair. He may be a bit controversial from time to time, but certainly not a spammer, troll or abuser. IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Have to agree.
He got a little shouty last night, but I didn't see anything more offensive than capital letters.
My vote: reinstate.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As the one he got rudely shouty with, I was a little peeved by his "over-effusive" reply, but it certainly didn't merit banning -- and the only person who really has room to complain about that message is me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Precisely.
I can see someone getting peeved with your message his was a response to - there are some ... um ... delicate souls ... here who can get "over enthusiastic" when they see even censored swearwords - but his was just shouty.
I see no reason for banning either. It's possible it's a vendetta thing: we know he got banned before.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Given that the problem with the thread is that no-one could tell what the Hell he was talking about, he did take it in a direction that few would have ("you have the right to remain silent", indeed).
I vote he's reinstated because I still don't know what, why, who, or even whether he was celebrating (telling people to change the language of a third-party site explains none of that).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling there was liquid happiness involved.
It would explain a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling that copious amounts of happiness were involved!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Somewhere between Bob Geldof and DD, I'd say.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm mightily interested in knowing how the rest of that scale looks like.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks kinda wobbly.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed you are, but you're not coming through as thinskinned to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone can say absolutely anything to/about me in fun, but I reserve the right to not accept maliciousness (that's kinda one of the things that being English is about).
I don't think he was being soberly malicious; it read more like he was drunk and bombastic (annoyance level +1), he somewhat strongly implied that everyone was idiotic for not getting his opinion by looking at a wiki page (annoyance level +2), and he would not say what he was talking about (annoyance level +2).
So yeah, "a little peeved" describes it well enough.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
