|
I can filter by not answered but can't get the questions without solution? I mean If I have a question where someone answered but didn't give me the solution then how other will notice that I didn't get the solution I want? It should still appear as unanswered until a solution is provided.
Suggestion is just add it as an additional filter?
- All questions
- Questions without answer
- Questions without solution
I <3 my Job
|
|
|
|
|
Mohamad M. Mohamad wrote: If I have a question where someone answered but didn't give me the solution then how other will notice that I didn't get the solution
Then it is not "Unanswered".See the below snapshot.
http://s20.postimg.org/djnu7iewt/List.png[^]
- First one is with no answers
- Second one is highlighted Green because OP has accepted the posted answer
- The third one is what you are talking about,that is answer has been posted but didn't solved your issue. In this case,others will identify it as the open thread.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Bravo so it is there but what still missing is the filter. my suggestion is to add a new filter next to All Unanswered to filter them by All Unsolved.
I <3 my Job
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
It would be nice to have an option to filter the reputation let's say by article or question, just to have an idea of how something is impacting the overall rep.
I don't think it would be necessary to have graphs for these filters, just a table or something of the sort..
There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure. Colin Powell
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that the "Rate" feature is now located at the top of the article page.
In my opinion it was way better located at the bottom as you usually rate after reading the article (or at least should have read). Scrolling the whole article up again to rate seems a bit weird 
(Yeah, I know I can use the "Home" button to get to the top of the page, still think it would be more natural when placed after the article  )
|
|
|
|
|
Better idea: Leave it there, and place a second one on the bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Marco
I <3 my Job
|
|
|
|
|
After the troll war we had the last days I had the following idea:
Every message posted by the said troll had to be reported for itself, which lead to the fact that there are still trollish items laying around.
No what If CP hides items from users which were banned for spamming and/or being abusive?
I am not talking about a permanent deletion - If the account is re-instantiated all the items would be available again, not harming false-banned members as Brisingr Aerowing a few days ago.
This may needs a bit of modification of the user management system, since messages of user accounts which were deleted on the request of the member would not need to be hidden.
Me thinks that a feature like that probably wouldn't harm anyone, given the fact how rare false-positive votings on members providing useful content really are but would make the clean-up work a lot easier.
Just my 5 cents, it may be too much effort for too few benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
The potential hazards outweigh the inconvenience I think. It's certainly do-able, but a little scary.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: but a little scary
Can you clarify why it would be considered scary?
It wouldn't cause any content to be deleted permanently...
Veni, vidi, caecus
|
|
|
|
|
Navigated to Who's Who: We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Problem: An item with the same key has already been added.
Ticket: 6491526
Server: Web04
I think I broke CP. 
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
It probably cannot keep up with recalculating indexes with the speed users are getting added and the banned again at the moment. 
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
You break it you bought it.
|
|
|
|
|
So CP is mine now! Bwahoohaha!
Right, I'm off to take all the rep-points of anyone who's been inactive for more than five years, that'll be good for a million and I'll be King! Top Dog! Big Banana!
I don't want to take all the credit though, I'll let you carry on paying the bills...
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a bug in the membership system relating to inheriting old accounts reputation points?
I have noticed that when our latest 'friend' registers a new account, his reputation points are higher than the previous account, and with each new account creation they keep getting higher.
The only common factor is that 'it' keeps setting the friendlyURL to the same as the previous accounts.
It is difficult to exactly see what is going on because there are so many accounts involved and the display name keeps changing (and can't see the old points once account dies), but the one common factor is the friendly URL remains the same.
Edit: the latest [^] account was created, friendly url changed to usual one and points immediately at 2563
Edit2: new latest [^] = 3103
See what I mean....
modified 6-Nov-13 6:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed similar with the list of comments when he was doing it yesterday with the 1990 one, logged it below.
Don't remember the rep at any point though.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
|
However it's just participants points. as he haven't got any mvp points I suppose its the signup & newsletter points which are increasing
Edit: good thing: participant points won't gain him anything other than hyperlinks in the biography 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
