|
After the big spam invasion in the QA section I wanted to check if some messages had escaped the clean-up so I made a search. The point is: In the search there are messages listed that were already nuked from accounts that don't exist anymore.
i.e. Searching "stream": [^], then right click on a spam-user[^] in the search list opens another filtered search
But when you go to the messages or the user itself, then you get
Quote: Sorry, the item you requested could not be found.
or Quote: Unable to load the requested member's information.
On the other hand... sometimes you get a error[^] (what in my opinion is correct) Quote: Your search did not match any documents.
I am not complaining or saying it is a bug, just wondering if this is correct behaviour or made on purpose.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You already have the answer in your question. since its reported as spam system (automatically  ) deletes the entry that may be the reason you see this result for search.
Jibesh.V.P
India
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for trying, but you didn't understand what I meant.
The question is... if it is deleted, why appears in the search? So that's why I put 3 different Links, one with deleted results, one of an deleted account and one that shows what I think is correct.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Sometimes on my Professional Profile page, I see a button "Log off from other places". What does that mean? Does that mean that someone else is logged in on my account, and that I can log off him?
In some cases, my signature will be longer then my message...
ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
It means you've logged on from another computer (or browser) and that session is still active. Clicking this button closes those remote sessions.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thank you!
In some cases, my signature will be longer then my message...
ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
|
I answered this question comparing variables in loops[^] and on seeing the other answer realized that I had misunderstood the question and so removed my answer.
I do see the addition of 10 points for given the answer, but these points were not deducted when I removed the answer as I believe they should have been.
I am not sure but I believe the statistic number of answers given (on the profile page) also did not decrease.
0100000101101110011001000111001011101001
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Just changed my email address, and I used to be member 572967, and now a new member id is assigned to me, 2667552. Is there a way for me to get back my old member id?
Thanks
Hanbo
|
|
|
|
|
572967[^] is still there, it looks like you have two ids. Get Chris to delete the one you do not want.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is common unfortunately. These sites steal content, but Code Project is good at setting the lawyers on these sites.
|
|
|
|
|
We will contact them. That's uncool.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The OP's article is dated Dec 17th. The article on the other site is dated Nov 6th. Of course it's trivial to set a past date for a blog entry. But just thought I'd bring this to your notice.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the article's revision history, it was originally published on Code Project on Oct. 11, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, my mistake. With all this Metro re-design, I missed that. But I blame Chris for this. 
|
|
|
|
|
or you lose your bug capturing skill ? just kidding!!
Jibesh.V.P
India
|
|
|
|
|
jibesh wrote: or you lose your bug capturing skill ? just kidding!!
The "just kidding" was not needed - that was fairly obvious. 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I noticed that previously, Its my article.
|
|
|
|
|
AshishChaudha wrote:
Thanks, I noticed that previously, Its my
article.
Yeah, I didn't think otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the HTML on the 3rd party article and it sure looks like they copied the HTML off CP. And then used an older date to make it look like the OP stole the artcle off them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My latest blog article was posted on 27 Nov 2012, but it was never listed in any of the newsletters that were sent after that. Is there any bug or wasn't it included for any reason? This is the article:
Improving LINQ code reusability: Select method[^]
Thanks in advance,
Rui
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. It allows me to report the same message twice if I press the refresh page. I think once I report the message It should be enabled for me to report again?
am I right?
Jibesh.V.P
India
|
|
|
|
|
You can report it twice, but only one is counted (as far as I know), you can change the reason of the report (i.e. spam-->repost).
If you report, when it is done, it appears a message with "X" reports (X is current number). That should stay the same.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
