|
Thanks for the catch, we will deal with them.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Success. All infringing articles from that site have been removed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Heartly thanks for quick and positive response..
|
|
|
|
|
|
HI
This is greate initiative taken by codeproject.
On this i would like to give one suggetion(i don't know how to access this TV but any way)
that is.
please keep one link on the front page(Home page) as well as also keep this inside the menu(or some where in header section) to access the vedios..
Please correct if any which is not known..
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
How do You know its tomorrow?
I wonder if it will have the same login as rootadmin.
Frazzle the name say's it all
Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
John F. Woods
|
|
|
|
|
Please read the news letter 1 April
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
We'll always have links on the homepage, and videos will appear in the search pages.
(and thanks for the kind words!)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
In 'My Notifications' page, the 'Clear All' button has a warning. However, Select All --> Mark Selected As Read sequence does not elicit this warning. I believe this has to be operate in the same way as the former test case right?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. The Clear All button has a race condition that the Select All version doesn't. Basically, Clear All removes ALL notifications, regardless of whether or not they are in this page. In other words, it may include ones that have just come in that you haven't seen. With the Select All and Clear version, you have more control over what gets deleted. This should help preserve you from unwanted side effects.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Basically, Clear All removes ALL notifications, regardless of whether or not they are in this page.
Do you mean to say it is going to span across the pages?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Yup - it clears ALL notifications.
|
|
|
|
|
...is very difficult to read and looks - well, a bit rubbish - because the actual date box is completely transparent and the date digits "hide" in the background text.
The universe is composed of electrons, neutrons, protons and......morons. (ThePhantomUpvoter)
|
|
|
|
|
What browser are you running?
Can you try hitting Ctrl+F5 to force a reload? Sounds like a stylesheet issue.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox 19.0.2 - but only until Chrome stops opeing tabs really, really slowly...
And...it's stopped being transparent and gawn all orange! 
I guess that's that sorted then.
The universe is composed of electrons, neutrons, protons and......morons. (ThePhantomUpvoter)
|
|
|
|
|
I usually find Firefox slower at things than Chrome is. Chrome usually opens tabs in <= new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 5);, while FF takes about new TimeSpan(0, 0, 5, 0);.
Gryphons Are Awesome! Gryphons Are Awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
Normally I would agree with you, but the latest version does seem to slug on some machines, for no clearly obvious reason - I'm not the only one seeing this. If you have a number of tabs, they can take a minute or more to open in chrome, and the CPU usage rises to use a whole core. I've switched to FF temporarily until Chrome works properly again.
The universe is composed of electrons, neutrons, protons and......morons. (ThePhantomUpvoter)
|
|
|
|
|
I usually don't have many tabs open, but I think the issue lies in Chrome's Multi-Process architecture, and the latency in the IPC system Chrome uses to control each process. I don't know of any real way to alleviate the issue, as it is a side effect of IPC (AFAICT).
Gryphons Are Awesome! Gryphons Are Awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I just want to say thanks. I have been using both CodeProject and StackOverflow, but must say that CodeProject monitoring people are just, well, nicer.
When using StackOverflow, I rather often get my questions deemed inappropriate, probably becuase they are judged too vague, even when a couple of people actually have replied to my questions. At CodeProject, the forum monitoring people seem more "tolerant", so thank you!
When I come to think about it, banning a question for being too vague is often rather silly: if one knew exactly what to ask, one should rather do a Google search on the question than take time from friendly developers. 
Happy Easter!
Petter
|
|
|
|
|
 I have to agree. Although, some people just ask questions here without doing any prior research, and sometimes they are just too vague to actually figure out the question, if there even is one there.
Gryphons Are Awesome! Gryphons Are Awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
Today, I voted 5 for the article About RSS[^]. Before my vote, the score was 4.19 (15 votes). After my vote, the score was 4.19 (16 votes). Because the score wasn't changed, I voted again. After my second vote: 4.41 (16 votes). By voting some other articles, I also saw that the score after voting a second time was different than the score after voting a first time.
Is this a bug, or is it just me?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Caching
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Posted an anster to a QA question, and got the following message:
We have tried to add your answer 0 times without success. Our servers are just a little overworked. Sorry. Zero times? Oh, come on little guys, you could have tried at least once!
A quick check and the answer had been posted anyway, but...
Firefox 19.0.2,
Web03 | 2.6.130330.1 | Last Updated 31 Mar 2013
The universe is composed of electrons, neutrons, protons and......morons. (ThePhantomUpvoter)
|
|
|
|
|
Gryphons Are Awesome! Gryphons Are Awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
The article editor does not accept XML document declaration and processing instruction in code block. When saving my article, this part disappeared. I tried IE, firefox and google chrome. None of them worked. I had to post the part in the WYSIWYG interface. Here is my article: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/570032/Dynamically-Create-Populate-and-Submit-an-InfoPath
Thanks,
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
