|
phil.o wrote: It does not seem complicated unless you are the one who has to set it up.
Yeah, I would happily set it up if I had access to the code. Do you have a point? 
Geez, what's with people like you who come out here just to shoot down valid suggestions?! In case you did not know, this forum exists for that very purpose, so I would appreciate you leaving this out for someone who runs the site to respond.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry you take it like that, I did to mean to upset you.
My point is: when you have to setup a rule which will impact a website of this size, nothing is easy.
So, please, chill out a bit, I'm not your enemy 
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
phil.o wrote: My point is: when you have to setup a rule which will impact a website of this size, nothing is easy.
Also, the moon is really big. Both of which I call out as completely irrelevant here. The complexity in implementing a suggestion is firstly not for you to judge, and is secondly beyond the scope of this forum. This forum does not exist to only for members to suggest quick and easy fixes.
phil.o wrote: So, please, chill out a bit, I'm not your enemy
I am calm as I could possibly be without you needing to tell me, but that doesn't stop me from calling out people on their nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever 
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
phil.o wrote: Whatever
That sums up your contribution to this thread pretty well.
|
|
|
|
|
You keep aggressing me for no obvious reason.
Please stop.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
No. You were the one who tried to shoot down a genuine suggestion I made, and added a condescending "whatever" reply when called upon that. And now you think I'm the aggressor? And have the gall to tell me to stop, when you keep adding pointless replies?
You have the ability not to carry on this pointless discussion, but I see you're repeatedly choosing to respond, while telling me to stop. Your logic is makes absolutely no sense.
|
|
|
|
|
I never tried to shoot down anything; I just made a remark which was not against you nor you suggestion; when I stated I did not mean to offend you, you kept on harrassing me.
But you can be quiet; I leave this thread and your sunny personnality.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
phil.o wrote: I never tried to shoot down anything; I just made a remark which was not against you nor you suggestion;
Your remark served absolutely no purpose there, which I thought was already made clear.
phil.o wrote: you kept on harrassing me.
Nonsense. You responded to every single post I made with passive-aggressive substance, including this one (which I'll respond to).
phil.o wrote: But you can be quiet
I have the abiliy to be quiet, yes. And so do you. Why are you stating that here though?
phil.o wrote: I leave this thread and your sunny personnality.
No announcement was necessary, as it's not that important for me to know. But I'd be glad not to deal with any more of your passive-aggressive tripe.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Maybe remove all messages if the account was opened in a specific timeframe? ... But that means adding special cases and I don't like those if I can avoid them.
LOL. Am I missing something here? I never asked you to do anything, my suggestion was for the site admins.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a can of worms
What if an account has been hacked? What if the user just had a brain fart and everyone jumped on him or her before they caught themselves?
On one hand it cleans things up quickly, on the other it's a fairly terminal resolution.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Chris.
Possibly apply it only for those "under water" kind of reputation accounts, that are may be only a week old? Better yet just hide the messages away from public view, and if the member appeals then a human could take a look at it and take a decision. Of course, it could still be a can of worms though. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
Suddenly it occurred to me that counting votes in our weekly polls instead of "voters" would help to avoid misunderstandings about the percentages. Probably it would be easier to interpret ... just a thought ... and this is an illustration how it could be done - the sum of percentage values at the centre is above 100, but weighting against all votes will keep the percentage at 100 ...
BR
modified 4-Dec-19 3:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - I thought of that many moons ago, but are those values, well, of value, given that multiple choices can be cast in some surveys.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
thank you for looking into this ...
About your point " ... but are those values, well, of value ... " I am not sure, either...
Being "exact-minded" I would be tempted to avoid "there is something
uncertain/unknown over here ..."-feeling caused by multicast poll results .
On the other hand, perhaps it is not that important as any poll is only somehow indicative
BR
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Shouldn't the spam post of a user be removed as well, or disable the links in the messages, after a user account has been removed?
|
|
|
|
|
Which account or message/article?
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was closed and only viewable by moderators. I’ve refreshed the cache and it’s gone.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Couldn't sign in, clearing textbox style would help, but on mouse over it hidden again!
I did not upgrade my Chrome to latest yet though.
However, using FireFox works for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using an ad-blocker? They tend to be the culprit when random elements of the site go missing.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I reported an article aprox an hour ago due to "Format / Layout issues" and I saw later that the guy was editing it. But the article now is two times in moderation.
When I looked into the "Versions list" of the articles, it landed in a closed previous version due to poor quality (so I suppose the guy want to improve and expand the content)
I don't know if he reposted it without noticing or is a possible bug.
I know I could delete one version, but I prefer to give the possibility to dig in.
Version #1: How to build Analyzers and code fixes by Roslyn using VS2019[^]
Version #2: How to build Analyzers and code fixes by Roslyn using VS2019[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 28-Nov-19 2:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
-- modified 27-Nov-19 13:10pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Icon problem[^] seems to have sneaked in.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Your link is something recursive. In case you refer to the report of Nelek, from my point of view the "Icon Problem" has not been solved yet, more it became worse
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
