|
I'm going for one last try, it looks like bad RAM may also exhibit some of the problems I've had. Started to get weird ghosting in the boot screens and a growing number of BSOD's. So that may resolve my issues. Then I'll just have to sort out the touchpad driver conflicts (or whatever is going on). Maybe do a fresh install of Win 10 rather than using the upgrade from Win 8.1. And most importantly get that Calc back in action.
Hopefully eventually this will work.
|
|
|
|
|
I have 24 GB RAM in my machine. Bad RAM would cause issues, as would a failing hard drive. Hope you get it working soon.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
StampedePress wrote: I'm running Fedora 23 on my other laptop
..but you had to try Windows 
A low-level format of the disc will remove Windows, after that you can install OS 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
'4d568c9e-cb32-4db1-a276-26cb06cc3f6f'(User, SomeVar)
Yep, this is an actual function signature in production code. (Erlang)
|
|
|
|
|
Makes more sense than some of the COBOL procedure and variable names I used to be faced with
|
|
|
|
|
FORTRAN was always good too: six character variable and subroutine names...got a little cryptic in large projects. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote my first compiler in Fortran IV - that was fun
|
|
|
|
|
FORTRAN IV... ah, that brings back old memories... not good ones, but old memories nonetheless!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
arrays of 16 bit integers to store strings and bit shifting and masking to access individual characters. Always fun
|
|
|
|
|
That does look to be a unique name, but certainly not the best choice of a method name; sadly not the worst method name I have ever seen either 
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, Should be considered as a best practice in JavaScript kind of language.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
 That's crazy! I am glad I don't use Erlang!
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Just reading the title of the reference book[^] confirms that I would want nothing to do with that!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure Yoda will understand that.
I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a similar book for learning Haskell, I believe. "Learn You a Haskell for Great Good"[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Someone using that as a function name is certainly no fault of Erlang, but that of a coder who should by up on disciplinary proceedings.
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. - Liber AL vel Legis 1:40, Aleister Crowley
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: Someone using that as a function name is certainly no fault of Erlang, but that of a coder who should be up on disciplinary proceedingshanged by the neck until dead, then hung from the lamppost outside work as a warning to others.
FTFY 
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it's me who did it. It was approved by all coworkes though. In Erlang we have many single-use one-liner overloads to take advantage of pattern matching. Such code is repeated in so many places that this kind of joke doesn't really hurt anyone. More code:
compute_price('POST', [], User) ->
'4d568c9e-cb32-4db1-a276-26cb06cc3f6f'(User, User:role_atom()).
'4d568c9e-cb32-4db1-a276-26cb06cc3f6f'(User, some_atom) ->
{JsonProps, Product} = process_request(Req, User),
RangesFromJson = calendar_lib:json_ranges_to_month_records(proplists:get_value(<<"ranges">>, JsonProps)),
UserClickCounts = [ Range:click_count() || Range <- RangesFromJson],
...
This is a very good language to implent any buisness logic or algorithms, but terrible if you try to interact with a front-end in web development
|
|
|
|
|
Well crap, I've used that exact function name just yesterday... 
|
|
|
|
|
I oddly like this. This function is presumably generated and used by some automated code generator and not something a human programmer would have to reference.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but some poor schmuck may have to deal with it. There should be a way to generate a friendly unique name based on the original source construct that caused the name to be generated. If nothing else, it could be based on the source file path and line number, just as an example.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Korsberg wrote: This function is presumably generated and used by some automated code generator
It's not.
|
|
|
|
|
Not only that; there are three other functions, within the same file, with names:
4d568c9e-cb32-4db1-a276-26cb06cc3f6g(User, SomeVar),
4d568c9e-cb32-4db1-a276-26cb06cc3f6h(User, SomeVar),
4d568c9e-cb32-4db1-a276-26cb06cc3f6j(User, SomeVar),
Maybe they should add this functionality to Intellisense: string matching from the trailing end
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ago, we launched a new Azure web application for a client. The application generates around 500 records (or one for every employee) in a particular table every workday. In the main processing page, if a daily record already exists for an employee, the record id was passed in with this code:
intRecID = CShort(Request("current_daily_rec_id").ToString)
The application ran just fine until this morning when all hell broke loose!
I had it fixed and posted within an hour of the first incident, but only after recording over 240 errors!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
What happened? An overflow?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
