|
Basketcase Software wrote: WPF has that nice "Device Independent Pixel" feature that WinForms lack I never missed it, but it IS fun to read the history of scaling and how we try to negate different resolutions and dimensions.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Abhinav S wrote: why would one switch to WinJS?
Windows Library for JavaScript
Yeah, exactly. Why???
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I have the impression it is kind of a Microsoft Bootstrap.
Edit:
(There will be probably an API war again)
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You're looking at it from the wrong angle. WinJS was never intended to pull people from the XAML stack; rather, it was introduced to try to persuade JavaScript/web developers to develop apps that would run on the confusingly named WinRT/Metro/insert name here platform. If you are a web developer, the theory is that it makes more sense for you to target WinJS than it does learning C#/XAML (for instance).
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation on WinJS is limited and at first instance it seems rather cumbersome to use.
Imagine they have a namespace concept in JavaScript (sort of neither here nor there)!
Any experience working on WinJS?
|
|
|
|
|
I did evaluate it when it first came out - there was nothing that would make me switch from XAML, but as I have been using XAML a long time, I'm not really part of the target profile.
|
|
|
|
|
I've poked at it a little bit, and it seems more built to interact with a stack back end template than with a actual developer. Just the navigation model is oblique and, as mentioned previously, cumbersome. There's also the fact that several of the hooks in it are for Windows API and not for a browser, which makes its usefulness as web application UX component limited.
I can't recommend it.
|
|
|
|
|
I've looked into using WinJS as a control suite/UI framework for Web Apps, as the most recent version, 4.0, can be run straight out of the browser. In this regard, it looks like a very good competitor.
However, for writing Windows Store Apps, if targeting other platforms is not a concern then XAML wins. XAML/C# is far more elegant than HTML/JS.
As for WinForms, XAML was definitely a step in the right direction and then came along the whole web craze which kind of killed it. Web frameworks are only starting to catch up to the abilities of XAML (check out http://aurelia.io).
modified 23-Jun-15 7:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: BusterBoy
Is that a Marvel Superhero? I totally missed that one.
|
|
|
|
|
He also goes by this[^] alternate persona.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
You have a seriously good memory, Ravi.
Have a good one Nish!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Belated B'day wishes Nish!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone that knows me, may be aware that at times, I may or may not have a not-so-rational hot temper. I'd like to think it's because I am wise and mature and all-knowing, well beyond my years. YMMV Well, yesterday I got hot tempered again with one of my neighbors, and I'd like to see the collective opinion of you guys if y'all think it was justified or not.
I currently live in a town home, and my "backyard area" is shared among three units in particular. It's not a big enclosure, but you make do with what you have. Yesterday, the neighbor two units over (and sharing the backyard area) up and decided to put a huge-arse trampoline there that quite literally consumes just about all the available non-porch space in the backyard area for all three units.
I wasn't a fan of these people to start with, but after seeing that (and considering this guy didn't even bother to ask the other two of us if that was ok), I pretty much lost it and banged on his door and let him have it. Granted, there's not much I can do after venting that's legal. So, now I'm calling the housing association for the town homes and so forth to get this resolved.
So my question to CP is, considering the obvious disrespect for other people when taking up all their space without even asking, do y'all think I was out of line for banging on his door and letting him have it? I don't, but then again I'm not one known for keeping the peace.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Depends. You've got a right to be peeved the bloke should have asked you.
But the fact it's a Trampoline suggests he probably has very small kids, like me. If you had come round my house banging on my door and shouting at me I would probably hit you (as long as your not big and muscly or anything).
If you knocked on my door politely and addressed your concerns to me politely, I would likely apologise profusely for not taking your needs into account and take it down immediately or come to an amicable arrangement in order to keep it up.
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: he probably has very small kids, like me Are you saying you're a small kid?
|
|
|
|
|
I needed that.
|
|
|
|
|
That's definitely how I read it.
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: But the fact it's a Trampoline suggests he probably has very small kids, like me. If you had come round my house banging on my door and shouting at me I would probably hit you (as long as your not big and muscly or anything). You are correct with the assumption of him having kids. Although I didn't see any behind the door when I was around. I'm sure my voice may have carried, but I wouldn't deliberately do that in front of kids.
That being said, I still don't think I was in the wrong, having kids or not. I didn't yell in front of the kids or to his wife. It was man to man. He's an adult and he should act like one.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: He's an adult and he should act like one. Ahem...
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Touché!
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: If you knocked on my door politely and addressed your concerns to me politely, I would likely apologise profusely for not taking your needs into account and take it down immediately or come to an amicable arrangement in order to keep it up. Exactly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you were more restrained than I would have been.
|
|
|
|
|
This is why I like you!
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|