|
I have a couple of legacy apps that exhibit a similar behavior...show up in the taskbar but not on the screen. The trick when that happens is to hover over the taskbar 'preview' window for the app, then right-click and select 'maximize'. It was quite annoying when it first happened.
Non-technicals will either go buy another computer, or call a techie for help!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
Close all other applications. Then right click and restore the errant application. This will "display" it somewhere on the system. Then right click the task bar and select "Cascade windows". This works about 99% of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
I get this all the time but usually behind a crash of the app that's misbehaving; my solution is standard and that's to hit ALT+SHIFT while mousing over the taskbar icon of the app then RIGHT MOUSE ... where I'll get the "MOVE" option. That option is found in the tricky RESTORE context stack and it's easy to miss because the metrical size of the popup control is so miniscule.
Sometimes the mouse "grabbing" action will miss the "MOVE" that should be able to be made by swinging the mouse through and you'll have to reselect using ALT+SHIFT. If that movement becomes a problem try just using keyboard arrows after you've affected the mouse click and .... HOLD .... until the app's frame starts to appear on your main monitor.
|
|
|
|
|
I usually go as OG.
ALT+TAB or Windows+TAB to set focus in the desired App
Windows UP to maximize + Windows left/right to set it in the seloected half of the monitor.
If you have multiple monitors you can use the Windows Left/Right several times, the order will be:
First right = right half of your current monitor
Second right = middle (floating) of the next monitor
Third right = right half of that second monitor
...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: How would a non-technical user be able to overcome this difficulty?
Likely one or more of the following.
- Ask friend/family for help.
- Uninstall it and forget about it. Perhaps also asking for a refund.
- Call/email support for product
- Complain on the product community site.
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #517 2/6 (100%)
🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜➡️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
not too hard
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 5/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨🟨
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟨🟩⬛🟩⬛
⬛🟩🟨🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Better than yesterday!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 5/6
⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
🟨⬜⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜🟨🟨🟨
🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩
🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 4/6*
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨
⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
🟩⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟩🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 4/6
🟩⬛⬛⬛🟨
🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 4/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩
🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 5/6
⬛⬛🟨⬛🟨
🟨🟨⬛🟨⬛
🟨🟩⬛🟩⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
modified 23-Jun-23 8:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 5/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩
⬛⬛🟨⬛🟩
⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩
🟩⬛⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Was a cool word I most certainly did not expect.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 734 5/6
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
The Titan submersible has been found about 1600 meters from the bow of the Titanic. It appears to have had a catastrophic implosion that ripped apart the pressure hull. RIP to the four who paid for this trip and the pilot. I have no sympathy for the fifth passenger as he was the CEO of the company and, based on reports, was warned multiple times by different people that this submersible wasn't safe.
|
|
|
|
|
The news story said lost at sea in the headline. But, at 159 atmospheres, they're dead.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
6000 psi down there. They wouldn't have had time to notice there was a problem - death would have been instantaneous. One moment 5 humans, the next a lamination on the carbon fibre.
RIP, and my thoughts are with the families (who definitely can afford to sue) ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: death would have been instantaneous Totally agree. Check my posts a few threads down and you'll see I said the same exact thing. I'm coming from a family of scuba divers, so you learn quickly the pressure would've killed them a lot sooner than running out of air.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 23-Jun-23 10:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: my thoughts are with the families (who definitely can afford to sue)
Apparently there are two separate companies. OceanGate owns the submersibles, and OceanGate expeditions charters them and uses them for their expeditions. Leaving aside the waivers the passengers signed, it is likely that there are no assets for the families to collect from.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
When did that ever stop lawyers trying?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was not the inaugural trip. That vessel had made dozens of trips before.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Some experts believe that multiple trips is the reason. So many cycles of load, that it was a fatigue failure, is what they feel. The carbon fibre structure may not have been designed/tested for this much fatigue load.
|
|
|
|