|
|
Money, money, money...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
This kind of arrogant assumption of ownership, and claims of being the only creative force behind something, only happens in workplaces where there are pig-ignorant people who think only of themselves, and never of their colleagues or the company.
i.e. everywhere.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The only winners are the lawyers!
As some of the commenters stated knockoffs coming out of china are way cheaper than the original and chips can be bought to make your own boards so let em fight they are only hurting themselves.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
pwasser wrote: Open Source?
Arduino is open-source hardware: the Arduino hardware reference designs are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.5 license and are available on the Arduino Web site. Layout and production files for some versions of the Arduino hardware are also available. The source code for the IDE is available and released under the GNU General Public License, version 2. [^]
So yes, Open Source. In the article you linked Massimo does refer to "royalties", but I guess those refer to the Arduino brand. That means you are free to assemble and even sell your own boards based on the published designs, so long you don't call them "Arduino" – if you want to, then license the brand.
If we are to believe Massimo's account, Gianluca cheated to get exclusive control of the brand in Italy, and is now trying to assert his company as the "true" steward of the platform. Those are legal and political issues, but they don't change the terms of whatever work has been already published.
|
|
|
|
|
xperroni wrote: but they don't change the terms of whatever work has been already published
Correct. However those waiting for the Tre and other new products may be affected by this.
For new users the 2 websites which look very alike are sure to cause heaps of confusion. All this will surely adversely impinge on this otherwise great endeavour.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I love leaders if they cheer. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes I hate myself, but, when that happens, I just kill the leader and make another Self the leader.
«To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"
|
|
|
|
|
I think hate is too strong of a word. Do I feel they are overpaid, incompetent, in-the-pocket-of-big-business, worthless scum of the earth?
Well, then, absolutely! 
(I refer here to political leaders. I stay away as much as possible from managerial "leaders", but they're about the same)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently I need Administrator Permissions from myself to delete a folder I created.
WHY? WHY WINDOWS? WHY? WHY? WHY?
And no, the folder was not locked by any other process. I checked with several tools!
I get this ALL THE TIME! It makes me want to switch to Linux for good and have Win-woes in a VM for certain things (like .NET dev).
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
So give yourself permission, what's the issue? It's not like Linux never asks you to give yourself permission, in fact it does it all the damn time.
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is that doing so doesn't work!
Here's what happens:
1. I try to delete a file/folder
2. Windows says I need Administrator permission
3. I click confirm to do so
4. Windows says I need permissions from myself
5. I click confirm
6. Go to 4
Using the 'apply to all' checkbox has no effect.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like fun. Have you tried deleting it from cmd running as admin?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Permission Denied. A reboot didn't work either. I finally went into an MSys2 Bash shell and used rm to remove it. That finally worked.
Free Software saves the day again!
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
what kind of file is it? Kill the process that is using the file, if possible. Then kill the file.
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't always work. I've had the same problem myself, usually when I've opened a file in the directory from another computer -- it comes up as "Access is denied". The same thing might happen if you run a file as a different user on the same machine (in fact, I'm pretty sure it did, once).
Even after you've closed the file on the other machine, the lock sometimes persists.
Unlocker handles this on Weven ("delete on next boot", which means I'm stuck with it for six months or so), but it's not supported for W8.
Pissing about with permissions on W8 is just too much trouble, so you can either literally "W8" to see if the system will ever unlock it, or boot with a Linux stick, and delete it from there.
[edit]
I forgot to mention that WinRar has caused this at least once, on W8. It appears to lock the directory of the first file it opens -- but it does release it, a while after you close WinRar.
[/edit]
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Did you create the folder in a "protected" area (e.g. Program Files)?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Nope.
Directory Path: C:\msys64\home\Brisingr\Sources-Test
There were several other folders there that deleted right away, including some with a - in the name.
I ended up using a Bash shell and rm to get rid of it.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I get it from time to time, because the system is using the folder to build it's thumb.db files, or the Explorer is holding it because it is trying to display a thumbnail view and hasn't realised I have moved away from the folder.
It's irritating, but it's not that bad - generally opening a different folder in the same explorer window and the going back to the original parent folder solves the problem. I wouldn't say it's a Windows problem specifically, so much as poor programing on Windows Explorer - which we all know is pretty crumby anyway!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
When you get this kind of problems you need to take ownership on the file or folder.
|
|
|
|
|
Install LockHunter and then either unlock it or directly remove it with that utility. If it's still impossible (not usually the case) then in that folder Administrator might not have the rights (files such as hosts etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have code in my view that reacts to a double-click on a listview so that the next successive parent of the SelectedItem being double-clicked is displayed. At the same time, other listviews which are synchronized to the SelectedItem(a ViewModel) of the listview being clicked shows the related ViewModel records.
How can I best separate this out in MVVM so there is no code in my view?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
