|
Too dangerous. This exe compiles together with the server and if you mess-up you could kill the server. It happened to me. UDF's are absolutely valid approach in Oracle though. There the libraries written on Java or C++ live in a separate processes. The performance is good too.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, who said make exe and run in server. I said make .Net assembly(formerly known as DLL). There is big difference between them.
The best way to make your dreams come true is to wake up.
Paul Valery
|
|
|
|
|
Well ... there are scalar functions:
CREATE FUNCTION justNumeric
(
@INP NVARCHAR(20)
)
RETURNS NVARCHAR(20)
AS
BEGIN
RETURN substring(@INP, PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', @INP), 1+PATINDEX('%[0-9][^0-9]%', @INP+'x')-PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', @INP))
END
SELECT MIN(dbo.justNumeric(ID)), MAX(dbo.justNumeric(ID)), Fruit
FROM Fruits
GROUP BY Fruit Still messy code though - a DB redesign is a better approach!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Functions significantly slow down queries. Not really a valid workaround, IMHO.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scalar functions are performance killer if you have SQL (selects...) inside. In his case the optimizer commits suicide. But with pure mathematical operations their performance is okay.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
patindex isn't SQL either, yeah so sure, why not add more rubbish?
it's not as if microsoft ever followed standards anyway.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well - there are functions, which can do this, sort of.
But, I agree. I work with a real DBA (who can program when necessary) and looking at some of his stored procedures and I would definitely go with MACROs to give my weary eyes and mind a rest.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Functions slow queries down. Not a valid workaround. What I want is a simple way to replace repetitive code that always seems to be found SQL queries.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It is nonsense to have a VARCHAR as primary key. SQL92 is all you need, this fancy stuff is just there to hide that the DBA doesn't know what he is doing.
An abomination.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I assume the question I answered was a classroom or homework assignment, so you can't blame a DBA for what was required. In the interest of full disclosure, I did rant about the assignment, assignments like it, and the idiot instructors that come up with this crap, in my answer.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Well, I assume the question I answered was a classroom or homework assignment, so you can't blame a DBA for what was required. Why keep people saying I can't? I can, and I would. It is the only correct answer, and anything else is unethical.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: In the interest of full disclosure, I did rant about the assignment, assignments like it, and the idiot instructors that come up with this crap, in my answer. Good; because someone will find it over Google and try to copy-paste it into his/her solution. Because, "hey, that's how we did it in school"
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Something like this, perhaps?
SELECT
MIN(N.JustNumeric) AS MinID,
MAX(N.JustNumeric) AS MaxID,
F.[Fruit]
FROM
[#fruits] As F
CROSS APPLY ( SELECT substring(F.[ID], PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', F.[ID]), 1 + PATINDEX('%[0-9][^0-9]%', F.[ID] + 'x') - PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', F.[ID])) ) As N (JustNumeric)
GROUP BY
F.[Fruit]
;
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 23-Mar-18 15:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's just brilliant, if the plan looks like I hope it does it will open up quite a few possibilities for doing things I've sorely missed in SQL-Server.
|
|
|
|
|
The execution plan is identical to John's query.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to nest the query a few steps further, that's when it gets interesting.
One of the things I've been sorely missing from Oracle is the 'Materialize' hint in CTEs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you a wizard? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then you must be the Wizard of lOZt tips 
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Are you a wizard?
No, but he did stay at a holiday inn express last night.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Something like this (slightly tested) should show that he didn't do it himself:
WITH [cte0] AS
(
SELECT [Fruit]
, [ID]
, PATINDEX ( '%[0-9]%' , [ID] ) [start]
, PATINDEX ( '%[0-9][^0-9]%' , [ID] ) [end]
FROM [#fruits]
)
, [cte1] AS
(
SELECT [Fruit]
, [ID]
, SUBSTRING ( [ID] , [start] , CASE WHEN [end] = 0 THEN LEN ( [ID] ) ELSE [end] END ) [numeric]
FROM [cte0]
)
SELECT MIN ( [numeric] ) AS MinID
, MAX ( [numeric] ) AS MaxID
, [Fruit]
FROM [cte1]
GROUP BY [Fruit]
I also have a table-valued CLR function that uses Regular Expressions, which would suit the assignment.
That would be something like:
SELECT MIN ( B.[Match] ) AS MinID
, MAX ( B.[Match] ) AS MaxID
, A.[Fruit]
FROM [#fruits] A
CROSS APPLY Library.dbo.RegEx ( [ID] , '^\d+' ) B
GROUP BY A.[Fruit]
modified 23-Mar-18 23:56pm.
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. ...
f:\>type jsop.sql
# define NUMERIC(x) (SUBSTRING([ID], PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', [ID]), 1+PATINDEX('%[0-9][^0-9]%', [ID]+'x')-PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', [ID])))
SELECT MIN ( NUMERIC ( [ID] ) ) [MinID]
, MAX ( NUMERIC ( [ID] ) ) [MaxID]
, [Fruit]
FROM [fruits]
GROUP BY [Fruit]
f:\>"F:\mingw\bin\cpp" -P -C JSOP.sql | sqlcmd -E -S localhost -d junk
MinID MaxID Fruit
---------- ---------- ----------------
1 3 Apple
4 5 Orange
(2 rows affected)
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: if SQL had macro functionality (kinda like C++)
Every C++ and C compiler that I have ever seen supported an option that allowed one to run only the macro compiler.
So one has source code X (text file), with macros, runs it through the compiler and the output is Y(text file) with the macros resolved.
I did exactly that at one time with Java files.
There is also at least one language that is specifically intended, far as I could tell, to support that sort of functionality. Believe it was called "M". But C++ macros might be better now.
|
|
|
|
|