|
trønderen wrote: Nowadays, DNA sequencing seems to be as simple as taking a breath. "Everyone" seems to do it in a snap. Covid19 RNA (it is RNA, isn't it? or is it DNA?) is obviously magnitudes below human DNA, but even human DNA sequencing seems to be a piece of cake today, to determine your ancestry, or your disposition of various diseases, or in criminal cases, or for a whole lot of other purposes.
Google "RNA vs DNA".
trønderen wrote: Most of this change has come in less than twenty years. What happened? Computers haven't become that much faster! (I got the impression that they are essential as a tool.) Is the speedup in other, non-computer analysis hardware? Or have the scientists developed a completely new methodology that is a magnitude or two faster? Or are those companies offering info about ancestry or disease risk doing only a quick, partial analysis rather than a full sequencing?
Computers did increase, as did our knowledge of biology.
trønderen wrote: To phrase it differently: If we twenty years ago had had all the knowledge that we have today about methodologies, would the hardware of the day be capable of sequencing the human genome in a many hours as they did use months, or are the methods of today fully dependent on recent hardware development? (I assume that computer hardware development is only part of it!)
Twenty years ago is 2001. I'm from 1977. We'd have dealt with it another way; stricter lockdowns, quarantines for entire cities.
Let me paint you a (realistic) picture; I'll be vaccinated this month, but the effectiveness of the vaccine is 70%. Nothing like measles. I won't be allowed outside during lockdown, vaccinated or not.
For every human it infects, millions of copies (and evolution). If it infects someone vaccinated in those 30%, it may become immune to the vaccine. So after my shot, I still need to stay indoors.
I am old enough to remember when every new vaccine was celebrated. We seen the effects of polio. Suddenly, half of our country refuses vaccines without any good reason. This "minor disease" as called here, may turn hostile soon, if we don't stop the amount of people it infects.
We need stop spread. We need to stop idiots.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: We need to stop idiots.
That's what people from both sides of the issue say.
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine the same with polio. Look up what the disease did, and how vaccines killed it.
There's no discussion here.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I say we wear masks forever, and stay in lockdown forever.
|
|
|
|
|
So, you trouble with history? We could and we won't. Because in time of polio, everyone wanted vaccine.
Slacker007 wrote: I say we wear masks forever, and stay in lockdown forever.
That's what I expect; if people do not want vaccine nor stick to the rules, the virus will spread, and with spreading it will copy a million times in every new body. And thus, it will evolve faster.
And with part of us vaccinated it will evolve beyond that. If just part of us vaccinated and lot infected, it will mutate beyond that.
There once was a time where we celebrated new vaccines because they save lives. Congratulations and kudo's to you.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
 you bore me Eddy. You bore me to 
|
|
|
|
|
Then quit reading and responding to what he writes.
|
|
|
|
|
In steps the playground referee. 
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: you bore me Eddy. You bore me to
Quit dreaming, I'll never bore into sh*t.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Even back when we had a soapbox, when he found himself shyte-faced, his answer was just his often-used hiding place of being dismissive. To a varying (but considerable) degrees, it's the cult/conspiracy mentality.
Anything that contradicts the dogma is party to the conspiracy and thus dismissed - eyes wired closed. Or, for some who think they've not been totally indoctrinated, they just try to ridicule what they don't agree with, then believe their own evasive position as being some equivalence of proof.
If you look not only in the US, but throughout the world, COVID isn't the only deadly disease going around - the likely more dangerous one is in heads (and I don't mean a head-cold).
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: Even back when we had a soapbox, when he found himself shyte-faced, his answer was just his often-used hiding place of being dismissive. To a varying (but considerable) degrees, it's the cult/conspiracy mentality.
I've been part of too many of those, causing the closing of said soapbox. I don't want to see the Lounge go.
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: If you look not only in the US, but throughout the world, COVID isn't the only deadly disease going around - the likely more dangerous one is in heads (and I don't mean a head-cold).
There was a time when we celebrated each new vaccine, but this one is met with resistance. Mostly due to "experts" on FaceBook and Twitter.
The new more dangerous one you mention, is prolly ignorance.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Imagine the same with polio.
Polio and covid cannot be compared this way.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: There's no discussion here.
Yes, I am seeing that pattern with you.
My only point was that you call people who think Covid is not as bad as you do idiots, and they call you an idiot. Possibly both sides are right.
|
|
|
|
|
20212 wrote: Possibly both sides are right.
Sorry, Spanky.
Deadly diseases do not behave like Schroedinger's Cat
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: Deadly diseases
Such as not understanding a post you are responding to?
|
|
|
|
|
20212a wrote: Polio and covid cannot be compared this way.
Why not?
20212a wrote: Yes, I am seeing that pattern with you.
So, this ad hominem is invalidating the statement how?
20212a wrote: My only point was that you call people who think Covid is not as bad as you do idiots
You maid multiple "points".
And yes, they're idiots; when was the last time all countries closed their borders? You are implying that's done all around the world for something that may be harmless. That's wrong, on a lot of levels.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no "both sides of the issue" with this. There are the people who accept the word of experts and doctors on virus behavior and its impact on society, and then the people who deny the reality of it, thinking they know more than the people who study this stuff for their entire lives.
You either know what Dunning-Kruger is, or you're on the low end of that spectrum.
|
|
|
|
|
You sure told him.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: You sure told him
Don't assume my gender. I am an ice cream cone today.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: There is no "both sides of the issue" with this
True, there's only science.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Thereare the people who accept the word of experts and doctors on virus behavior and its impact on society, and then the people who deny the reality of it
So, the people who accept science, and the religious ones.
This is not a discussion; it about whether you accept science, with all it's proof, or go for religion without any. There's no middle ground here.
And frankly, those that do believe, should be left to their gods.
--edit
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: You either know what Dunning-Kruger is, or you're on the low end of that spectrum.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias (thought error or bias), in which people who lack knowledge and have poor skills in social or intellectual areas incorrectly overestimate these characteristics and abilities in themselves Which you proven. Quod Eddy Demonstrandum.
Did you have more to add?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
modified 2-Mar-21 18:56pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I have understood it completely wrong, but I think he was backing you up as his message is for 20212's answer to your first comment.
As I already have said a couple of times... try to take it easy Eddy, you are not being "attacked" by the whole CP
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: As I already have said a couple of times... try to take it easy Eddy, you are not being "attacked" by the whole CP
You're right, ofcourse.
Been offered the advice before. Will try to take it more serious.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: There is no "both sides of the issue" with this.
Really?
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: There are the people who accept the word of experts and doctors on virus behavior and its impact on society,
That's one side.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: and then the people who deny the reality of it
And that looks like another side. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you misunderstand.
When I hear "two sides of an issue", that means there's discussion with some semblance of rational thought on both sides.
This issue, no. There's one side that just denies reality, listens to the right-wing marketing, and has no rational thought process justifying their position.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: denies reality,
What reality? The one where we were told millions would die last year? Or the reality that masks are good, or wait, they don't help much, or wait they're essential, or wait, not so much, or wait, they are mandatory? That reality?
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: right-wing marketing
What benefit or motive does the right-wing have to be against vaccines? Or what are you suggesting the right-wing is denying? I know lot's of right-wingers and nearly all of them want the vaccine.
You are claiming right-wing craziness but without some explanation you sound like a left-wing screamer with no facts.
Can you expand on what you mean?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, really? How about every red state treating this like the common cold? Never shutting down, or, now, opening up way too early with no mask mandates?
The Republican mantra is "Profit at all costs". Opening up and freely letting the virus spread will only do two things. Kill more people and give the virus more and more opportunity to mutate, possibly into something the current vaccines cannot protect against. All so businesses can survive over people surviving.
Texas has 7% of its population vaccinated and is opening up 100% next week like there's no chance of anyone getting infected.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
