Click here to Skip to main content
15,909,546 members

Bugs and Suggestions

   

General discussions, site bug reports and suggestions about the site.

For general questions check out the CodeProject FAQs. To report spam and abuse Head to the Spam and abuse watch. If you wish to report a bug privately, especially those related to security, please email webmaster@codeproject.com

 
GeneralRe: Pls have Preview window remember its size and location. Pin
HimaBindu Vejella28-Feb-06 18:30
HimaBindu Vejella28-Feb-06 18:30 
GeneralRe: Pls have Preview window remember its size and location. Pin
Prakash Nadar2-Mar-06 5:37
Prakash Nadar2-Mar-06 5:37 
GeneralRe: Pls have Preview window remember its size and location. Pin
Ashley van Gerven1-Mar-06 5:04
Ashley van Gerven1-Mar-06 5:04 
GeneralPls have indentation work in "code" mode similar to "pre" mode Pin
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 11:37
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 11:37 
GeneralRe: Pls have indentation work in "code" mode similar to "pre" mode Pin
PJ Arends28-Feb-06 12:22
professionalPJ Arends28-Feb-06 12:22 
GeneralRe: Pls have indentation work in "code" mode similar to "pre" mode Pin
Michael Dunn1-Mar-06 13:55
sitebuilderMichael Dunn1-Mar-06 13:55 
GeneralRe: Pls have indentation work in "code" mode similar to "pre" mode Pin
l_d_allan2-Mar-06 2:00
l_d_allan2-Mar-06 2:00 
GeneralPls encourage authors to include cppunit-like verification Pin
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 10:50
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 10:50 
I am a HUGE fan of CodeProject, and very appreciate of the website. For my purposes, I consider it one of the most valuable resources on the Internet. Thanks!

Several things would be helpful and often missing for many articles, especially those which involve algorithms:

* Console app using the algorithm. I find these MUCH easier than gui's to figure out with a debugger to step-into and step-around.

* Extensive, even exhaustive tests to provide a high degree of confidence that the submitted code actually works. I REALLY want to reuse their code and not "re-invent" the wheel, but I really often wonder how "bullet-proof" the code is.

* I looked on the website for "Guidelines for Authors when Submitting Articles" but perhaps didn't look hard enough.
EDIT ... found the webpage for Authors ... but would suggest those guidelines put more emphasis on providing test code

For example, I'm trying to reuse some submitted code related to tokenizing. I found several applicable articles. It would be VERY valuable for the demo code to have something like the following to show that the code has been rigorously tested:

char* testStringsWithTokens[] = { 
// Test                        Expected Result
  "a",                         "1 <1 a>",
  "a b c",                     "3 <1 a><1 b><1 c>",
  " a b c ",                   "3 <1 a><1 b><1 c>",
  "one two three",             "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  "one\ttwo\tthree",           "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  "one,two,,,, ,,, three,,,",  "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  " one two three",            "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  " one\ttwo\tthree",          "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  " one,two,,,, ,,, three,,,", "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  " one two three ",           "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  " one\ttwo\tthree ",         "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  " one,two,,,, ,,, three,,, ","3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  "one two three ",            "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  "one\ttwo\tthree ",          "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
  "one,two,,,, ,,, three,,, ", "3 <3 one><3 two><5 three>",
// snip .... more tests
};


I realize that it isn't CodeProject's responsibility to see that such test code is included, and I'm VERY appreciative for what is available .... but the authors who presumably want their code to be reused are perhaps less aware that they could be of the value of cppunit-like test code ....

Again, thanks.

-- modified at 17:40 Tuesday 28th February, 2006
General[Message Deleted] Pin
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 10:58
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 10:58 
GeneralRe: Pls encourage authors to include cppunit-like verification Pin
Shog928-Feb-06 11:33
sitebuilderShog928-Feb-06 11:33 
GeneralRe: Pls encourage authors to include cppunit-like verification Pin
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 11:40
l_d_allan28-Feb-06 11:40 
GeneralCP Bug Pin
Prakash Nadar27-Feb-06 3:35
Prakash Nadar27-Feb-06 3:35 
GeneralRe: CP Bug Pin
Prakash Nadar2-Mar-06 5:34
Prakash Nadar2-Mar-06 5:34 
GeneralRe: CP Bug Pin
Chris Maunder2-Mar-06 5:36
cofounderChris Maunder2-Mar-06 5:36 
GeneralRe: CP Bug Pin
Prakash Nadar2-Mar-06 5:41
Prakash Nadar2-Mar-06 5:41 
GeneralStats On My Articles Page Pin
George B Gilbert24-Feb-06 10:18
George B Gilbert24-Feb-06 10:18 
GeneralGreat idea! Pin
Ashley van Gerven1-Mar-06 5:09
Ashley van Gerven1-Mar-06 5:09 
GeneralRe: Stats On My Articles Page Pin
Jason McBurney1-Mar-06 15:19
Jason McBurney1-Mar-06 15:19 
GeneralRe: Stats On My Articles Page Pin
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar1-Mar-06 22:41
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar1-Mar-06 22:41 
GeneralRe: Stats On My Articles Page Pin
Chris Maunder2-Mar-06 8:16
cofounderChris Maunder2-Mar-06 8:16 
GeneralRe: Stats On My Articles Page Pin
George B Gilbert2-Mar-06 10:04
George B Gilbert2-Mar-06 10:04 
GeneralRname the Visual C++ and C++/CLI forums Pin
Maximilien24-Feb-06 2:39
Maximilien24-Feb-06 2:39 
GeneralRe: Rname the Visual C++ and C++/CLI forums Pin
Prakash Nadar25-Feb-06 4:20
Prakash Nadar25-Feb-06 4:20 
GeneralRe: Rname the Visual C++ and C++/CLI forums Pin
Maximilien25-Feb-06 4:52
Maximilien25-Feb-06 4:52 
GeneralRe: Rname the Visual C++ and C++/CLI forums Pin
Michael Dunn26-Feb-06 9:22
sitebuilderMichael Dunn26-Feb-06 9:22 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.