|
Umm.. The whole thing about having an event signaled is the use of multiple threads.
Since you seem to have only one thread I don't understand why you consider this solution.
Why don't you post a user defined message from where you are signalling the event and write a message handler for that message instead?
--
Roger
It's suppose to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Let me explain the application more clearly. i've a demodulator hardware which keeps pumping out some sound data which is being feed to a sound card.
I've used "DirectX" to achieve this. when the sound fed to the card has finished playing ,the application has to be notified so that it can fill the buffer with new data and play it again.This process has to repeat continuously.
Please let me know whether using MsgWaitForMultipleObjects(...)is a good idea ?
rajeev
-- modified at 6:54 Thursday 27th April, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
rajeev82 wrote: MsgWaitForMultipleObjects(...)is a good idea ?
It depends on how you know when your demodulator has finished feeding the sound card...
If it signals an event, then I suggest you create a worker thread simply waits for the event with WaitFormUltipleObjects(), presumably there's no need to process messages.
If a message gets posted you write a message handler and restart the feeding process from there.
To be able to help you futher we need to know how you can tell when the demodulator has finished feeding the sound card.
--
Roger
It's suppose to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!
|
|
|
|
|
The demodulator doesnt feed the data to the sound card directly.Itz my program which collects the data from the demodulator and feeds it to the sound card so that it can be heard.the sound which comes out from the demodulator is in chunks of 4096 points.
In directx there is a interface called IDirectSoundNotify which will notify my application when one chunk of 4096 has been played ,so that the next 4096 points can be loaded ,played and so on.
as long my application runs the demodulator will work and it'll pump out something(atleast noise).so please tell me how to call a function according to the notification i receive.
rajeev
|
|
|
|
|
Well, given that I've understood your problem correctly I suggest the following:
1. Set up interface sinks and create objects necessary.
2. Create a worker thread that gathers the data from the demodulator and put the data in a queue which is read from...
3. a second worker thread that feeds the sound card and waits for an event which gets signalled when your app is notified using WFMO().
4. Marshal needed interfaces to your threads before you unleash them. (Create them suspended.)
This will keep the GUI responsive since the main thread is not blocked.
You should also get the notification in the main thread.
Read JoeNewcomer's article[^] about multithreading if you are unfamiliar with the subject.
Hope this helps
--
Roger
It's suppose to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!
|
|
|
|
|
(VS 2005 MFC) I have a list of 5 threads, for example:
struct T_PARAMS
{
HWND hWnd; // a handle to dialog window, using in thread
};
int thread_count = 5; // I have 5 threads
CWinThread *pThread; // pointer to thread
CList<cwinthread*, cwinthread*=""> mList; // list of the pointers to threads
int lp = 0;
// First I create 5 stopped threads:
for(lp = 0; lp < thread_count; lp++)
{
params = new T_PARAMS();
params->hWnd = m_hWnd;
pThread = AfxBeginThread(ThreadFunc, params, THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL, 0,
CREATE_SUSPENDED);
pThread->m_bAutoDelete = true;
mList.AddTail(pThread);
}
Now, when I have a list of pointers to threads, I want run threads, but I want to do it in this way: run first thread (mList[0]), wait so long how the first thread is working, next run second thread (mList[1]) and so on. For example:
POSITION pos;
CWinThread *wsk = NULL;
pos = mList.GetHeadPosition();
for(lp = 0; lp < thread_count; lp++)
{
wsk = (CWinThread *) mList.GetNext(pos);
wsk->ResumeThread();
// [*] now wait until thread is working - how to do it?
}
My threads are working properly, I use one semaphor to allow works only 1 thread at once, but I don't know how can I do - in line [*], that programm will wait after wsk->ResumeThread() until this thread is finished his work?
Regards
mwgomez
Poland
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at Joe Newcomer's article about worker threads. It's excellent!
He'll show you how to all of this the correct way here[^].
I urge you to read the complete article since it will make you aware of problems you have to know how to deal with when doing multithreading.
Hope this helps
--
Roger
It's suppose to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!
|
|
|
|
|
First when you create the thread but before you let it run make sure you do the following (you will have to create it suspended):
pThread->m_bAutoDelete = FALSE;
There is no point in having a collection of CWinThread pointers if you have no way of knowing if the object pointed to has been delete or not!
Now you can wait for a thread to exit using the Win32 API as follows:
WaitForSingleObject(pThread->m_hThread, INFINITE);
Remember we've turned auto deletion off so you have to remember to delete the CWinThread objects when you're done with them - deleting one doesn't stop the thread running (if it's running).
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
how to write a logfile in the COM component
suresh
|
|
|
|
|
Use an ofstream object for that:
ofstream OutputFile("MyFile.txt");
int SomeVariable = 10;
OutputFile<<"SomeText"<<SomeVariable<<endl;
|
|
|
|
|
ok thanq
but,i want create .txt file at the server side.........
suresh
|
|
|
|
|
Which server ?? Please when asking a question be more specific. What are you trying to do exaclty ? Provide as much relevant information as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Then give a file name to a file at the server! Example:
\\Server02\Share$\aDirectory\aTextFile.txt
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to do this in Windows without .neT?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
BOOL CreateDirectory(
LPCTSTR lpPathName, // pointer to directory path string
LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpSecurityAttributes // pointer to security descriptor
);
BOOL RemoveDirectory(
LPCTSTR lpPathName // pointer to directory to remove
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
i have 2 variables like
char * username
char sysname[MAX_PATH]
i need to use "NetUserGetInfo" windows API method, which takes two LPCWSTR strings, how can i convert the above sysname,username to pass them to NetUserGetInfo.
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Use A2W string conversion macro.
void func( LPSTR lpsz )
{
USES_CONVERSION;
...
LPWSTR x = A2W(lpsz)
...
}
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
I need exactly the reverse way,
that is i have char* username, char sysname[max_PATH].
i need to pass these 2 variables to NetUserGetInfo(LPCWSTR,LPCWSTR)
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
gbabu17 wrote: I need exactly the reverse way,
that is i have char* username, char sysname[max_PATH].
i need to pass these 2 variables to NetUserGetInfo(LPCWSTR,LPCWSTR)
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Life isn't easy, isn't ? 
|
|
|
|
|
if your problem is NetUserGetInfo for conversition) use (or like this)
LPTSTR user;
LPTSTR computer;
user=(LPTSTR)LocalAlloc(LPTR,256);
computer=(LPTSTR)LocalAlloc(LPTR,256);
DWORD d=256;
GetUserName(user,&d);
DWORD dd=256;
GetComputerName(computer,&dd);
wchar_t *m_User = T2W(user);
wchar_t *m_computer = T2W(computer);
DWORD dwLevel = 4;
USER_INFO_2 *m_Userinfo;
DWORD dddd=NetUserGetInfo(m_computer, m_User , 2, (LPBYTE*)&m_Userinfo);
|
|
|
|
|
Which is what A2W() does. I've done it this way in the past:
LPUSER_INFO_2 pUserInfo = NULL;
CString strUser;
NET_API_STATUS nStatus = NetUserGetInfo(L"\\\\server", A2W(strUser), 2, (LPBYTE *) &pUserInfo);
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"We will be known forever by the tracks we leave." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
I have faced this question in an interview,
Design algorithm for elevators using any design pattern.
please guide me regarding this.
krishna
|
|
|
|
|
Well I can give a brief description 
When they go up they keep going up processing the requests on the way.
and
When they come down they keep coming down processing the requests on the way.
They don't change direction in between unless they have processed all requests in that direction
and
BTW if anybody gives another request before it changes direction it processes that too.
This is called the elevator algorithm.
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
