|
|
In CodeProject homepage, in the Votes section, I have the following suggestions:
(*) Disable 'View Votes' unless the vote is cast.
(*) 'View Votes', can open up a small DIV using AJAX and if only the user wishes for further details like 'View Optional Text Answers', 'Discussion Board', a link can be given in the DIV to open the target page.
That would be very much user-friendly. Is'nt it?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
namespace LavanyaDeepak
Personal Weblog
The World of Deepak and Lavanya
ViewPoint 24x7
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Do all three of you use the same CP account 
You know you're obsessed with computer graphics when you're outside and you look up at the trees and think, "Wow! That's spectacular resolution!"
To Err is human, to forgive is not a COMPANY policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not brown nosing at all (o.k., maybe a little). I'm a lawyer by trade, and am a novice at programming. I latched onto ASP.net 1.0/1.1 early, tried my best to learn it, and created my own site wich was fun. When Whidbey (ASP.net 2.0) was announced, I was a bit bummed because I'm no developer and don't have much time to learn. However, I latched onto it too if only for MasterPages and Wizards (among other cool stuff). I'm sure I'll be latching on to 3.0 whenever that comes out.
Out of ALL the sites (ASP.net included), this is the best site on the net. It's chock full of code/samples/tutorials. That you let users contribute is your strongest aspect. A lot of what I have on my site was modified from code I found here, or tutorials I read, or just general design ideas.
That being said, I was wondering if you could create a new ASP.net 2.0 tab, and modify the ASP.net tab to be ASP.net 1.0/1.1 (althought that won't fit on the tab). 
I think this might have some good results: 1) obvious separation of the two platforms; 2) people may either update their own code, or modify other code to 2.0 (that benefits newer users, and, errr, me of course -- j/k); and most importantly 3) it will continue to make this the best site on the net. Think about it, how many sites out there that "were" good have just gone by the wayside, or provide too little content too few times, or <gasp> are strictly subscriber based? Code Project is in a good position to just kind of blow the competition away.
That's my two cents.
-REM
BTW, what's the little green mascots name?
|
|
|
|
|
remesq wrote: what's the little green mascots name?
He's Bob
You know you're obsessed with computer graphics when you're outside and you look up at the trees and think, "Wow! That's spectacular resolution!"
|
|
|
|
|
When reading an article and then clicking on the Messages at the bottom, the message is shown, and then Firefox immediately reloads the page.
But this doesn't happen in IE.
Any ideas... I've got version 1.5.0.3
Mahen
|
|
|
|
|
Well it does not happen with me. I am using 1.5.0.4
|
|
|
|
|
It was the Tabbed Browser Extensions!
I've disabled it, and it now works fine...
It's rather disappointing, cos I liked the extension.
Mahen
|
|
|
|
|
It would be good to have one since I happen to search a lot at CP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please eliminate the ability to give 1 to a post, unless sender describes his/her reason?
Like Windows 2003 that we have to explain the reason to shutdown a server, it might be good not to be permited to give a 1, unless we define a good reason, at least this way, we understand that the 1 has a true reason or not, if Like a usual message the reason will be published globally.
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
-- modified at 6:59 Tuesday 13th June, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Then, 2 becomes 1; we need to give reasons for 2...
Then, 3 becomes 1; we need to give reasons for 3...
Then...
So we need to give reasons for every vote. We can't vote any more.
- It's easier to make than to correct a mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
Voting is a fundamental pillar of western civilisation. To be denied the ability to vote would be a gross injustice.
Voltaire (1694-1778) wrote: I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it.
Jörgen Sigvardsson , on the subject of Wikipedia, wrote: Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least you have the chance to correct the wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
I never saied "Deny the ability to vote"
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hamed Mosavi wrote: I never saied "Deny the ability to vote"
Actually, you did say that, even if you didn't realise that you did. You said "Could you please eliminate the ability to give 1 to a post, unless sender describes his/her reason?". If the person doesn't want to give a reason they would be denied the ability to vote the message.
The buttons 1 to 5 are voting buttons - That is why, when you press one it says
Voted: 5
Scottish Developers upcoming sessions include:
.NET debugging, tracing and instrumentation by Duncan Edwards Jones and Code Coverage in .NET by Craig Murphy
My: Website | Blog
-- modified at 2:37 Wednesday 14th June, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
So, it might be probably about my bad english. I try to explain it more.
I understand voting. I actually don't want to deny giving 1. I just want the 1er(The guy/lady who gives a 1), describe his/her reason, or can't give such a bad vote. I gave an example about Windows 2003 to make myself more clear. It's a box next to "1" that any one selecting 1 must fill it, otherwise rating will not be done.(I can't find a better word to put here instead of "be done", but I know about voting there was one)
So you can give a "1" just if you say why. That's it.
Is it equal to remove 1? If so, I must be crazy giving such an idea because 1 becomes 2! we have just replaced a symbol("1") with another ("2").
Did I describe it good enough?
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: You'd end up with lots of comments like this: adfjd;fjadl;fdjas
By strange coincidence, that's also the top reason my Win2k3 install has been shut down... 
|
|
|
|
|
You wrote:
Requiring voters to comment will not fix anything. You'd end up with lots of comments like this: adfjd;fjadl;fdjas
I answered this already:
at least this way, we understand that the 1 has a true reason or not, if Like a usual message the reason will be published globally.;)
P.S. I read your article about COM, great and I created a picture that need to send you, how can I do that? (I hope you'll read this)
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
