|
Sure - the ADO.NET classes are available to you in a console app, just like a windows one. You'd use the same code in both cases, to run the SQL that alters the table.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
SASA_1 wrote: hoping to do is run a SQL alter table statement from a Console application
It can be done and there is nothing special about it being a console app. You can do the same as if it were a Windows app 
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
My boss wants me to write a small console app that runs at midnight everynight. The app opens up a "job file" (in this case, the job file will have a list of training days that people will be attending), connects to the exchange server (via the admin login?), opens that users calender and inserts that training day into his/her calender. If the user deletes the appointment, the app will create it again....
the only trouble im having is connecting to the exchange server at the "top level" as an admin so i can open a users calender and create/modify their appointments...
Does anyone have any suggestions / controls i can purchase that will help me build this app?
Many thanks,
Will
|
|
|
|
|
here is a question for you, at the moment how are you interacting with the Exchange server programmatically ? Are you using the IMAP protocol to access the exchange server.
With regards to purchasing controls, you dont have to. If you use .NET 3.0- 3.5, WCF has web services that can interact with Exchange Server 2003 and 2007. The other thing you can do if you dont want to use the new framework and still use .NET 2.0 then use the Lumisoft DLL.
Here is the link
http://www.lumisoft.ee/lswww/ENG/Products/Mail_Server/mail_index_eng.aspx?type=download
With regards to logging in, my recommendation would see if you can TELNET into the Exchange Server and excute an IMAP login process using the administrator username and password. You will need to google about using TELENT IMAP calls to Exchange Server.
I have used the lumisoft DLL successfully to build an application that interacted with Exchange 2003. So if you need more help then feel free to post more questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to write a 'simple' program that reads a text file and makes the data in this text file available via a serial port. I'm developing a program which reads GPS data from the serial port. For now, I made the GPSDataSource abstract. So, I can read from the file directly, but i want to test the SerialPortGPSDataSource also. I don't have a GPS at home, so a GPS simulator would be great.
I don't want to use any 3rd party programs. I want to be capable of doing it myself. Is there anybody that can point me to some source, info, whatever to get me started, because I 'm googling now for hours and I didn't find any useful (as far as i know).
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
There are some articles here about SerialPort
bridging the gap between a SerialPort and a file should be easy
simulating the timing aspects of a GSM may be more difficult.
there is a freeware null modem emulator called com0com
it creates two virtual COM ports that behave as if interconnected by a null modem,
so you can have your app talk to one of them, and the GSM simulator to the other one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello experts,
My application uses the Settings.settings file defined by VS, along with controls' ApplicationSettings property.
When defining a new setting in the settings file, it is possible to set its type to every type defined in the assemblies referenced by the application, but not the assemblies defined by the application.
My application defines an enumeration, but I cannot use it as a setting type.
Is there any workaround for the problem?
Thanks in advance,
Shy.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a form that has a Done button. I set the DialogResult property for the button to "OK". When I click the button, I want the app to close, but nothing happens. What am I missing?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming you mean you want to make a messagebox button close the form, not a button on the form itself??!
If you want to make the messagebox button do something then...
DialogResult dr = MessageBox.Show("Text here", "Header Here", MessageBoxButtons.OK);
switch (dr)
{
case DialogResult.OK:
this.Dispose(); //Or whatever
break;
}
If the button is on the form itself. Just double click on it in the designer screen, C# automatically generates everything for you, so all you need to type is "this.Dispose();" in the method.
Hope this helps.
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
On the form itself is a property for which button sends the OK, but that's actually just used for pressing enter to click OK. I'm not sure why it wouldn't close, it should. One nasty behaviour in .NET is, if you have a form with an OK button and it has a child with an OK button, pressing OK will close them both. But, obviously, you have the reverse going on. I'd just handle the click, and call the Close() method ( I would NOT call this.Dispose() )
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Calling Close() did the trick. I just got done doing a C# version of my persistent string parser, and this was the last thing I had to address before writing an article on. If you're really bored, you can try to find out why I had to do this (calling Close).
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I do a terrible job of keeping up with my email notifications, did you resolve the ASP.NET issue you had the other day ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: did you resolve the ASP.NET issue you had the other day ?
Which one? There are so many...
Yeah - I got IIS5 straightened out, and can run a ASP page from a .Net wrapper.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
If you show the form with ShowDialog() clicking a button closes the dialog and
returns the button's DialogResult.
if you show the form with Show() clicking a button does not close the form;
if it is what you want, you should add a Close() to the button's Click handler.
|
|
|
|
|
U must call the form's close method too.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I have a control panel which I wish to hide when there is no mouse movement. I have looked into the MainForm_MouseMove and MyTimer_Tick
and tried to detect the mouse move which is used to enable the timer. The timer makes the control panel available for a period of the time and once again the control panel is moved away from the display.
The problem is when I use new System.Drawing.... to draw the control panel, it also create a mouse movement and start displaying the Control Panel again. The control panel practically is displayed all the time as it never get the change to disappear.
Can anyone tell how I can over come this issue?
Thank you very much and have a great day.
Khoramdin
|
|
|
|
|
Khoramdin wrote: The problem is when I use new System.Drawing.... to draw the control panel, it also create a mouse movement
 sounds like a miracle to me.
show us some code !
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: show us some code
That might be helpful
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
plz all i want your help urgently
i have a form that include combo box which contain all axps pages in my web project
my case is>>>
when i choose each page from the combo box i can call each control in the selected page to load them in the main form
so i have to make a function which take my page.aspx name to return all controls in this page without open this page i mean without open the selected page previously .
really thx for all and special thx for each one can help me
Kareem Elhosseny
Kareem Elhosseny
|
|
|
|
|
You want to load controls from an aspx in another aspx ? Sounds like you need to create user controls that define what you want to load in two places, and use them in the two places.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Really thx for your attention Christian but i want to make a spot on my case ihave acollections off pages like page1, page2, page3.........
and a main page.aspx
in this main page i put combo box which load all pages if i choose any one of them i can see all controls in this page without open it previously
my problem in the fact i cant see the pages to access the controles in it
and asking if there is a way to make all pages in asp globally or public to see them in any place in my web project
Kareem Elhosseny
|
|
|
|
|
If I do something like this:
int i = Convert.ToInt32("asdfas");
without the try/catch block and start a program with the above line in VS2005, the IDE will catch the exception, show the appropriate message and position to the problematic line.
On the other hand, if I have an assembly that is loaded at run-time, for instance like this:
a = Assembly.Load(strAssembly);
Type ObjectType = a.GetType(strClass);
object obj = Activator.CreateInstance(ObjectType);
MethodInfo mi = ObjectType.GetMethod("SomeMethod", pars);
mi.Invoke(obj, null);
and there is an unhandled exception somewhere in the assembly, VS2005 will not catch that exception (even if assembly is compiled as DEBUG and can be debugged into) but instead 'mi.Invoke' will exit with generic exception 'exception has been thrown by the target of the invocation'.
Is there a way for VS2005 to catch these exceptions and position to problematic line like it does with non run-time loaded assemblies?
Dragan Matic
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I want to create my own XP Shell Replacement, preferably using C# or C. Are there any good only resources to tutor me on this?
Thanks!
C# and JavaME(J2ME) Programmer
|
|
|
|
|
If you are considering replacing the Visual Style UI, then good luck. The closest that I have come to doing that can be found on my article: http://www.codeproject.com/vb/net/transmenuandtitlebuttons.asp[^]. However, if you are thinking about replacing the 'Desktop Window' and then creating an environment without editing system information it may be more easier.
Using AutoIT (I believe that that is the correct name), you can get a handle of the desktop window which holds the taskbar, listview (desktop icon arrangement), etc. After you have a handle using WinAPI commands you can hide the window, take note of the parent. Create another window and set its parent to whatever the 'desktop window' parent is.
From a performance view, C may handle system resources better than a .NET application. Either of the languages should get the work done though.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my homepage Oracle Studios[ ^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
