C / C++ / MFC

DavidCrow wrote:

Does that go against your design?

namepsace MyNamespace{
	class A
	{
		int a;
		void FunA()
		{
			a = 10;
		}
	};
	class B
	{
		int b;
		A aObj;
	public :
		void FunB()
		{
			aObj.FunA();
// Here I want to use private member of class A.
// For that I was making FunB() as friend of class A, due to which compile error was generated.
// So for this, making class B as friend of class A, is the only solution?
		}
	};
}

George_George wrote:

What mean codebase here?

George_George wrote:

In the world of Windows and COM, does the codebase transfer also apply?

George_George wrote:

"Specifies where the common language runtime can find an assembly.". We are talking about marshalling in COM, and I do not think they are related?

George_George wrote:

In the world of Windows and COM

George_George wrote:

code base means binary executable file

George_George wrote:

For automation compatible data types, we only need to let the other party know the type, and they could be able to decode/deserial

George_George wrote:

For the Java, I am not sure if we need to decode/deserialize the content for a type, we need to provide not only the type information, but also the binary executable code?