|
I am not clear about C# but as per your answer is it same like JVM used in java? Which take care about memory management.
Do not trust a computer...
Always check what computer is doing
regards,
Divyang Mithaiwala
Software Engineer
|
|
|
|
|
Divyang Mithaiwala wrote: I am not clear about C# but as per your answer is it same like JVM used in java?
No, in Java it is also called the garbage collector. I guess you are a bit confused about the names. JVM stands for Java Virtual Machine.
|
|
|
|
|
Cedric Moonen wrote: No, in Java it is also called the garbage collector.
Yes it is garbage collector. But it is part of JVM. Because at compile time java compiler not going to put code related to garbage collection.
Do not trust a computer...
Always check what computer is doing
regards,
Divyang Mithaiwala
Software Engineer
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I came late,your answer was Garbage Collection and its the .Net method.
Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )
|
|
|
|
|
ParagPatel wrote: I don't know that much about c# but how language does matter when your application kiled?
That's true. When your application gets terminated, you really don't have to worry about the memory it was using. All those get wiped off.
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, why are you writing such a rogue program that would do nothing good but allocate huge amounts of physical memory? Tell me the name of your program. I must be sure never to use it!
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Tell me the name of your program. I must be sure never to use it!
Vista. 
Well...No, I'm wrong Vista uses all that memory in order to prevent you to access system's resources... 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, in this case, I would like to defend Vista. It just tries and fills up available physical memory with programs that you consecutively use (XP does not do that, so there's plenty of free available memory shown up in the task manager) so that the next time you open the program, it is opened fast. A pretty good idea if you ask me. 
Joke: Except for the fact that I would not want my physical memory to be filled up with my father's accounts excel sheets when I try to play far cry. 
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: it is opened fast. A pretty good idea if you ask me.
Yes, it is good, if you've a lot of bloated-garbage-collected-applications...
Just kidding, you're right, but, I suppose this is not a new idea, Linux applications had sticky bits since a long time.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Joke: Except for the fact that I would not want my physical memory to be filled up with my father's accounts excel sheets when I try to play far cry.
You're a very lucky man: my physical memory is filled by my wife talking and talking and talking...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: ...not a new idea, Linux applications had sticky bits ...
Ugh... What is Linux? I'd like a plate of it, preferably with fries.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yes: Lunix, La Sapienza & French fries!
I should know we two are the best in THHBing
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Management memory at vista is differennt with XP,It cached all memory of your system for more speed.
Of one Essence is the human race
thus has Creation put the base
One Limb impacted is sufficient
For all Others to feel the Mace
(Saadi )
|
|
|
|
|
When a Windows process exits all its resources get freed automatically, including memory, whatever its programming language or technology is.
|
|
|
|
|
Making cleanup is fundamental task the wise C/C++ programmer.
That said, when a process is terminated, the OS frees automatically the allocated memory.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
hi all，
i wrote several lines to set up a wide pen and use this pen draw lines and arcs to a screen and printer. on the screen the line width is ok, but on the screen the line is still thin with the width of zero.
static HPEN PC_hPen;
PC_hPen = CreatePen (PS_SOLID,2, RGB (255, 0, 0)) ;
SelectObject (PChdc, PC_hPen) ;
MoveToEx ( handle_dc, 1, 1, NULL) ;
LineTo ( handle_dc, 10,10 ) ;
|
|
|
|
|
on the printer the width is still zero, sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
adeshayee wrote: i wrote several lines to set up a wide pen and use this pen draw lines and arcs to a screen and printer. on the screen the line width is ok, but on the screen the line is still thin with the width of zero.
If the underlined 'screen' means 'printer' then you possibly are not aware that printers, as general rule, have more more more resolution than screens.
I.e. you need a very thick pen to notice the difference.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
adeshayee wrote: ...on the screen the line width is ok, but on the screen the line is still thin with the width of zero.
This is not the least bit contradictory.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
I just heard abou Qt4. As I understand that Qt4 is used to create GUI.
but what is the advantage of Qt4 comared to Visual studio c++ 2008?
thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Seraph_summer wrote: but what is the advantage of Qt4 comared to Visual studio c++ 2008?
Such a comparison makes poor sense.
A better one would be between MFC and QT. That said, let me google that for you.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Read here[^].
You need to google first, if you have "It's urgent please" mentioned in your question.
 _AnShUmAn_
|
|
|
|
|
QT is a cross-platform framework, which means you can compile the same code for different platforms. But, MFC/Visual C++ is specific to Windows platform.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
And a lot of developers find it, as framework, better than MFC, but shhhhhhhhhh, don't tell Rajesh!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Hello:
I want to open a URL from a Visual C++ application in a default browser. This URL has a '#' character as following : file:///C:/Mydocument.html#_MySegment
I'm using the following instruction:
ShellExecute(NULL, "open", "file:///C:/Mydocument.html#_MySegment", NULL, NULL, SW_SHOWNORMAL);
The result is that the document is opened but it doesn't go to the mark "_MySegment".
Any help will be very appreciate.
Thanks in advanced!
Loli
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at this page[^] shows that ShellExecute parses the string you pass it to work out how to open it. I guess that file: protocol URLs are parsed like that to work out what file type you're passing it, and that ShellExecute just passes the filename to the browser.
I would suggest you use FindExecutable[^] to get the application associated with your HTML file and use that with ShellExecute or CreateProcess, explicitly passing your URL as a command-line parameter.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
