|
| Take a look here[^] for some potential samples. txtspeak is the realm of 9 year old children, not developers. Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
Thanks i tryed that
That is nuts thare is every thing and you can do anyting but i fix it a little to complex for me hehe
Thanks
bob
|
|
|
|
|
Want to Update .Net Framework 3.5 to .Net Framework 3.5 SP1................please
send me link .............I just want to
update .Net Framework 3.5 to .Net Framework 3.5 SP1..........Not Complete installation of .Net Framework 3.5 SP1
Thankz in AdvanceDre@m is not th@t wh@t u see in sleep.Dre@m is the thing which does not allow u to sleep
|
|
|
|
|
| Use Windows update, or go to the Microsoft .NET web site. txtspeak is the realm of 9 year old children, not developers. Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
| There's not a separate SP1 if that's what you mean. You'll have to download the whole lot. It will get downloaded in Windows Update btw. Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am getting an error while opning the project in visual studio 2005.The project is created in Visual Studio 2008.
I don't have Visual Studio 2008 right now.Please let me know that is there any Service Pack or any other way to do it.
Following is the error:
"This project cannot be opened form source control because it was created by a version of Microsoft Visual Studio that is incomplete with this one.
If this is the case, you may be able to open it from source control using that version of Microsoft Visual Studio, and then use Microsoft Visual Studio to open the local copy."
Thanks,
Abbas
|
|
|
|
|
Visual source safe issue, may be your server(network) machine is in OFF which contains the projectmodified on Friday, February 12, 2010 4:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Found this here[^].
How can I disable the integration between VSS and Visual Studio?
Under the registry key: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\DevStudio\6.0\Source Control (for Visual Studio 6.0) or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\DevStudio\5.0\Source Control (for Visual Studio 5.0) , change or created the entry:
Name: Disabled
Type: REG_DWORD
Data: 0x1Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am developing a project in which i need to find the size of image and convert it into inches/cms/mts.
Can anybody help me to convert the pixels size to other units in VB.net
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
dileep2009 wrote: in which i need to find the size of image and convert it into inches/cms/mts
You'd need to determine the DPI[^] of the medium that this image is going to. Then you'd count the pixels; you could determine the size in inches with those two values - and convert it to centimeters or meters if required  I are Troll 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have 10 Objects of different types, each object interacts with every other object, but depending on which object is interacting with which, it performs different functions.
For example
if i have objA, ObjB and ObjC then they could interact as follows
ObjA + ObjB performs function x
ObjA + ObjC performs function y
ObjB + ObjC performs function z
and so forth.
My question though is: From a true object orientated way, what is the best way to deal with this problem? Is there a particular design pattern i could have a look at? Doing this the wrong way would include several nested Select Case statements, but would cause a major maintenance hassle especially if the number of objects increased
I'm using VB.net
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
thesoulfyguy wrote: Is there a particular design pattern i could have a look at?
Looks like a good fit for the Decorator[^] pattern.I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have to create a windows service. While browsing the internet I found a few articles which are taking about classes which should not be used in the windows service. So far I found the following.
System.Timers.Timer
System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherTimer
System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker
Is that correct? Are there any aditional classes which should not be used in a windows service?
Thanks in advance.
Uroš
|
|
|
|
|
It depends more on what and how your service is going to be used.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean how? The service communicates with an .net application using WCF and than releys data to ethernet device using tcp sockets.
Uroš
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to be missing the point. Perhaps more research on what a Windows service is, and isn't, will clarify it for you.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
In general you have to avoid everything that does something with the GUI.
Services that try to open a window or something in that way will hang up
(except services that can interact with the desktop, but don't use this anymore because it becomes obsolete).
But you can use the class System.Timers.Timer in a service, you can't use the System.Windows.Forms.Timer!Greetings
Covean
|
|
|
|
|
I know I should avoid anything that has to do with UI. But Background Worker does not exectly fit that criteria. Is the information regarding the Background worker event corrent?
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see any reason why BackgroundWorker shouldn't work in a service.
Its just using delegates and normal events.
I also googled a little bit. It says it works on a service but this class is designed for
UI purposes only so you shouldn't use it. Just use a normal Thread, this will work in any case.Greetings
Covean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you read the last message on this board?
"It works fine in a console or service app with no forms. The delegates are
run on thread pool threads instead of the UI thread. So there is nothing
special going on, just delegates, BeginInvoke, and events. Try it yourself." Greetings
Covean
|
|
|
|
|
BETA1 releases of Microsoft Enterprise Library 5.0 and Microsoft Unity 2.0 are available for evaluation now.
Those who followed the progress of the patterns & practices team through the regular iteration-end code drops are aware what a massive undertaking this has been! With exception of the integration with the Visual Studio, this release is feature complete. Enterprise Library users who are looking at this release for the first time, please review thee Change Log.
The team is very excited about the improvements they’ve made to the overall Enterprise Library architecture and configuration experience, both of Enterprise Library and Unity (with new configuration tools, fluent interface and IntelliSense support with new schemas). They also focused on making Enterprise Library easier to extend.
Here’s your call to action. Download this Beta1 release. It will quite happily run side-by-side with earlier versions, so you can easily evaluate it without disrupting your development environment. Try the new features. Attempt a migration of an existing application. Tell Entlib Team about your experiences.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
