|
Indeed.
However, it wasn't a surprise, and no one should be "shocked" (which everyone on the news claimed to be). We've seen this coming for years. The poor guy died very slowly.
|
|
|
|
|
I was back in SA in September and heard people talk about the conspiracy theory that suggested he died some time ago and was kept "alive" until it was convenient to release the news. Some even suggested his return home was just a charade to keep the peace until after the next election. It's scary that there are folk out there that believed it. 
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Ever realize that the video you want to watch sometimes buffers, but the ad that plays before NEVER buffers?
|
|
|
|
|
I am more annoyed by the few times they have a mandatory 30 second ad and the ad is nothing you are interested in. You can't click away, you can't refresh, nothing. It would be one thing if I had even a passing interest in it but usually the mandatory ads are the ones I want nothing to do with.
I am, however, guilty of watching a few of the non mandatory ones. The ones I can't skip, I just go to the bathroom or something out of principle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cool article about Rush Limbaugh from yesterday boosted my self confidence enough to try to share some of my hacks.
Now lazy as I am I cannot write an article in one session, but I saw a small checkbox saying "Work in progress: don't publish". If I submit that can I come back to the article and finish it later and where will it be accessible?
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you can come back and finish it. Your "works in progress" are listed under your articles, and they should give you the chance to edit them. Saying that, I tend to prefer to write my articles away from the CP code editor and submit it at a stage when it's ready. If you go here[^], you can get the template file that conforms to what CP expects, and just work with that. That's the way I roll.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Pete. Also, for one of my earlier articles I asked a couple of people here to review it before I posted it to make sure it wasn't complete crap. Constructive criticism really helped to get the article into shape - it's amazing how many times you can read what you wrote and still miss silly little things that someone else can pick up straight away. Good luck.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Work on it offline, and when it's done, post it in its entirety.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The cool article about Rush Limbaugh from yesterday
I'm offended. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I write mine in Notepad using the template then email it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Even for a big chap, he was struggling a bit....
Wow, and to think the Vikings sailed in that stuff. Or not, I guess.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
And they died in that stuff! 
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
No wonder your working on Raspberry Pi, might throw in a Strawberry pie!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll never complain about my cube again...
Charlie Gilley
<italic>You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house.
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
wow Dave !!
Im surprised there's not an OH&S issue there, no safety strap/harness when the wind exceeds a certain factor - even on what I'd call a 'closed' deck
'g'
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of the first time I went to Wellington NZ, the council workers were putting ropes with knots along all the city footpaths. When asked they replied they were expecting a breeze that afternoon. It was very much like that video.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: replacement for our current .net obfuscator due to it being hard to use
Sorry, that makes me chuckle.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
For obfuscators I recommend DeepSea[^]. The price is good, the quality of obfuscation is quite excellent and their support is top notch, to boot.
Don't get me started on RedGate. I lost a lot of respect when they took Reflector and turned it into a failure. Turning it into something rotten was one thing; charging for it was another.
You mentioned ILSpy. Have you looked at JetBrains DotPeek? It's free and complete. I found ILSpy a bit lacking in some respects. It's still an excellent tool but being open source (?) I don't think it's moved on very much. JetBrains[^] decompiler is a polished product.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny enough, DeepSea seems to have just recently gone dead. There's a note up on the homepage that says there will be no future releases, and the current version is now unsupported freeware.
|
|
|
|
|
That is really surprising and unexpected. I last dealt with them about 18 months ago when it cost roughly £250 for a licence. I recall they had a couple of blokes running it and they couldn't do enough to help me. It's a pity; they really had a passion for the product but like all of us with bills to pay and food to buy, perhaps there wasn't enough money coming in to make it viable. Still, the price now is even better.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, the price is fine, but I doubt many serious developers are going to want to rely on an unsupported abandonware obfuscator. That really is a shame, though, it looks like it was a good product.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
