|
A waste of perfectly good gin!
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting recipe. Exactly how much is a "shot" of gin? Depending on your personal preference, it can be anything between a thimble and a pitcher... 
and only a "dash" of tonic water. Also quite vague. Furthermore, it's optional, so leaving it out would make it a gin cake only...
Nah, I'll wait for a mojito cake!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: anything between a thimble and a pitcher
Is the correct answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Oooohh! nice; proably will be trying that.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Let's just do it. I see no reason why not, and if you don't like being singled out then maybe you should start doing something about what's happening in your communities.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming you mean "passenger profiling based on racial, ethnic, or perceived religious background".
That's ridiculous.
How effective do you think it would be if that became the norm? Would prospective terrorists dress like:
0) Target groups that fit the profile because they might actually be in that group
Or
1) Respectable, "normal" people who don't.
Answers on a postcard to:
ThisCausesHarrasmentOfTheInnocentOnly House,
ThisMakesItEasierToSmuggleBombsOnAPlane Road,
BecauseTheyAreConcentratingOnPercievedProfilesRatherThanThreatIndicators City.
Please mark it for the attention of Mr. Cluebat.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Would prospective terrorists dress like:
So you've took Passenger Profiling to mean only stopping people because of the way they are dressed. You've then gone on to assume that anyone who doesn't get pulled up on the passenger profiling, will just be let on with no checks.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: You've then gone on to assume that anyone who doesn't get pulled up on the passenger profiling, will just be let on with no checks.
If the normal checks are sufficient to catch them then the profiling is redundant. If the normal checks are not sufficient then the bad guys get through them so your point is invalid.
modified 3-Jul-14 8:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
WiganLatics wrote: you're point is invalid
Watch out, the Grandma Police will be after you for that one!
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I don't know how to delineate the two words without speaking them 
|
|
|
|
|
You're - You fokin are
Your - Belongs to fokin you
It's not difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
Mea culpa, that was a dodgy typo. I didn't spot that, but yes it is possible to delineate between THOSE words.
I *thought* you were playing on the double meaning of 'invalid'.
modified 3-Jul-14 9:24am.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Would prospective terrorists dress like
You never know. I remember years ago viruses were named things like "formatc.exe", "deleteal.exe", etc. Some havoc wreakers are stupid.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - but the stupid ones are easy to catch.
If you concentrate on only catching them, you miss the clever ones - who are capable of making a device that works. Looking for them is more important, and catches the morons as well.
I seem to remember that most of the "stupid virii" didn't work either, because the authors put loads of effort into the distribution, and forgot to learn how to code and test in the first place! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I got scanned at an airport not so long ago. I was guided into a large box where I was scanned from top to toe. Didn't realize it was one of the infamous "naked" scanners until I heard the entire security staff laughing hysterically on the outside... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
modified 3-Jul-14 8:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
Pic or it didn't...
Um, no. On second thoughts, I believe you.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Sure. Here you go[^]!  (SFW)
BTW: You might want to read this book[^] to your children to prepare them... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. So that means I should be cavity-searched every time I travel?
I'm a white, middle-aged male from a rural community with strong anti-gun control sentiments. It's virtually guaranteed that I'm packing, and intend to take control of the plane.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I got you beat - I'm a veteran who values my privacy, wants a smaller government, and prefers to pay for things with cash.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I've got you both beat, married to an Arab of Palestinian & Syrian extraction from a deeply connected political family.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
How about travelling on FOUR different passports? Does that make *me* a threat?
|
|
|
|
|
It makes you FOUR different threats.
"Who are all these gin smugglers!"
|
|
|
|
|
No, being a threat makes you a threat :P
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
<<sarcasm on="">> And thinking of moving to a shack and dislikes University's & airports Unabomber style!<>
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Wheeler wrote: and intend to take control of the plane.
That's only because your you're1 a developer and you know that whatever algorithm the pilot's using is inefficient or just plain wrong and if you want something done right you need to do it yourself.
1 sigh.
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 5-Jul-14 14:48pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
