|
I think that's how most people seem to use LinkedIn... "looking for a job, time to update my account!" 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and utterly ineffective. But I don't use it other than to keep my work profile more-or-less current (+/- a year or so)
Otherwise, yeah, it's mind numbing, but not as much as Farcebook.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I get a lot of people contacting me about Network Marketing
"are you interested in additional income? we can help!!!"
kind of irritating..
"apparently people get really pissed off when you stop speaking in the middle of a "
|
|
|
|
|
Worked for me ... set a profile up when I was ***** off at work, kept it (sort of) up to date then out of the blue got a message from my network... and did end up with a contract as a result. Have had all of the silly adverts, all of the annoying agencies randomly trying to connect, but have also managed to put others in touch with contacts that have led to them getting jobs. (Insert happy face here)
But it was never intended to be a "social" network - I tend to "slap" back on the "likes" and random "endorsements" ... I've been endorsed by my garden designer for SDLC ffs!! 
As some of the other posts intimate ... it's a tool to be used if you want to use it. It can be effective. It can also be an irritating annoyance. You can also make a right old mess of it. Most of the (UK) advisory companies mentoring groups through redundancy situations rate it quite highly though (that T-shirt has been worn)
|
|
|
|
|
You can use it as Facebook:
- post what you do and see what your mates do.
You can use it to read about points that interest you:
- following companies and people that are close to your job or needs.
You can use it to find jobs:
- there are tools to make this.
In my case, I have some contacts and I've participated in some forums that are interesting to me, but I've got nothing positive from it, only time waste by now... I guess that if some day I run out of job, I could try to use it to find a new place sooner. But who knows...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know anyone in LinkedIn (or Google+, for that matter), but my network keeps a-growin'.
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: It's somewhat unavoidable in today's digital age
No, it's not.
I deleted my account a few months ago. And no, never got anything usefull from there but a lot of spam.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: No, it's not.
I deleted my account a few months ago.
Well, the fact that you even made an account in the first place sort of means you didn't manage to avoid it altogether.
|
|
|
|
|
Found in the library a set of DVDs with Sherlock Holmes stories played by Jeremy Brett. Never heard of him, but his play is very enjoyable. He is a very good Holmes me think...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. He's the perfect Sherlock Holmes. There was a bit about those productions that was a little over the top and ham fisted.
But as an incarnation of the Holmes stories, they're second to none.
Most if not all of them are available on youtube.
RIP
|
|
|
|
|
He played him to perfection.
Got a bit rough at the end but he was dying at this point.
He was as much Holmes as David Suchet was Poirot.
The defining performance of a generation.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: He is a very good Holmes me think...
Indeed. They had many of his Sherlock Holmes movies on Netflix, and it was a pleasure to watch. Read up on him on wikipedia, it's quite interesting how the Holmes character affected him.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Just a trivia note:
He (much younger) also played Freddy Eynsford-Hill in My Fair Lady (1964)!
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
I've recently contacted my coach to schedule me another fight. I think it's a go because we are discussing lead time for the training camp. Probably/hopefully in august.
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
If you go to a local bar and start looking at the wrong women, you could have one tonight fairly easily!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: If you go to a local bar in Wales and start looking at the wrong women ![Sheep | [baah]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/sheep.gif) , you could have one tonight fairly easily!
FTFY. 
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
loctrice wrote: to schedule me another fight.
No need to wait. There's always one waiting in the Soapbox.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Win one for us nerds! ...good luck! 
|
|
|
|
|
You do know the first rule of fight club?
(What always troubled me is - how do they propose to enforce the rules?)
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: (What always troubled me is - how do they propose to enforce the rules?)
Bob broke the rules, and he's buried in the garden now.
|
|
|
|
|
We tied him up and threw him in the sea. "Bob-for-a-short-time" we called him.
|
|
|
|
|
Stop by my place anytime, and we'll find a gym. I'm horribly out of practice, so a bit of sparring would probably do me a world of good. 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I would be we aren't anywhere near one another.
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the author of my Haskell course really wanted to be a poet.
I found this while going through chapter 8: Functional Parsers:
Alternatively, the parser type can also be read as a rhyme in the style of Dr Seuss!
A parser for things
Is a function from strings
To lists of pairs
Of things and strings Found in Programming in Haskell by Graham Hutton[^] 
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
That's probably a valid Haskell program
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
