|
Yeah...but you do have to wear silly little glasses and drive a Saab...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
A fair point - and if you should move into project management your job description is closer to "proctologist" than "engineer".
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Vilmos orders a Saab* 
|
|
|
|
|
You might have to wait a while for delivery: they went bust in 2012... 
[edit]Turns out they are making a come back (again) and selling the same cars that didn't sell last time, plus "an electric car" (so that should be ...um...different)[/edit]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool, which model? I, II or III?
|
|
|
|
|
If you enjoy developing webpages, keep doing what you're doing but at a higher level.
Being management can be good and satisfying if you have a solid team, but woe to those who get saddled with 1 or more slackers.
The other side of the coin don't go into management and bludgeon everyone with the old "I've got an MBA, so..."
Whichever you choose, make sure it is what you want to do, and good luck!
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
AndyInUK wrote: I want to move into management side in few years time.
How about "Boardroom bully"
|
|
|
|
|
Stick to what you are best at and forget the ego. (You can make a lot of money as a technical expert, far more than a manager can by the way).
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer to call myself an Ontology Engineer[^] 
And no, you can't use it, it's been taken!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: And no, you can't use it, it's been taken!
If he gets a degree in it, why not? By the way, where did you get your degree in Ontology?
|
|
|
|
|
Depends who you want to blame
Consultants blame architects
Architects blame consultants and developers
Developers blame consultants and architects
|
|
|
|
|
'Users' is a category entirely absent from your analysis.
This makes me think you've never worked in the business.
|
|
|
|
|
25+ years in the business.
Users?
|
|
|
|
|
RugbyLeague wrote: Users?
A mythical class of people whose opinion you must hold higher than anyone else's. Have fun getting their opinion since they are mythical.
|
|
|
|
|
Good one. What was that "whoosh"-ing sound?
BDF
The internet makes dumb people dumber and clever people cleverer.
-- PaulowniaK
|
|
|
|
|
AndyInUK wrote: Now after completing MBA, I want to move into IT management side of world.
AndyInUK wrote: What do you all suggest?
Not going over to the dark side?
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not "Web Development Architecture Consultant"? 
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Pick what ever role best fits the job application's requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
AndyInUK wrote: Developer or Web consultant or Solutions Architect
It depends how you want to market yourself and what it is you really want to be doing. Even though architect sounds like you're at a higher level, I've dealt with plenty of "solutions architects" that were just systems engineers that put things together but hardly ever did any of the real work themselves (so using the title may backfire if someone considers it to be high-level but not understanding of the details). Consultant sort of implies that you're only looking for contract work, not full-time employment (not sure if that's what you're looking for).
In any case, I'd stick to being specific to the type of job you're after. If you're applying for a job that specifically states "Developer" and you apply with a resume that says "Solutions Architect", guess who's not getting a call? ...goes the other way around as well... if there's a posting for a "Systems Engineer" or "Solutions Architect", they may not want a "Developer" that has very specific, yet narrow skills.
|
|
|
|
|
Welder. Become a welder. They work shorter hours, get paid overtime, and are well armed for defense in case someone yells at them.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I think a title of Solutions Architect would build a better bridge to management than Developer or Consultant.
An Architect usually guides developers on technical issues while a manager guides developers on more day to day or project level execution.
As always, check with state level licensing boards to make sure your title does not violate any laws! In my state, you cannot use Architect, Engineer, or Doctor in your title unless you have passed the appropriate state boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't chase titles. Don't chase money.
Do that which you enjoy and inspires you. Don't worry if they call you janitor, developer, king.
You'll have a much more rewarding and enjoyable life, which is really the thing FTW.
|
|
|
|
|
AndyInUK wrote: I want to move into management side in few years time.
What does that mean to you exactly?
A consultant isn't typically going to "move into management" unless the goal is to create a consultant company.
An architect might or might not be a manager but in that case it really involves wearing two hats and not really just one.
Becoming a project manager as a goal might be more on line to "move into management" although a team lead would work as well.
Keep in mind of course that it general it is going to be easier to "move into management" in a larger companies although probably not within one large company. Thus one might move into a team lead position at one large company, do that for a while, then get a job at another company as a project manager thus moving up more quickly than versus staying with the original company.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
