|
|
*ahem*[^]
And while on the subject...[^]
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Well it was time it was told again after almost two years!
Good ones
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have run into an infinite loop.
'i' is implicitly defined as an 'int', i.e. it has 32 bits.
8 nines = 2^25 < 99,999,999 < 2^26, loop bound is 'int'
9 nines = 2^29 < 999,999,999 < 2^30, loop bound is 'int'
10 nines = 2^33 < 9,999,999,999 < 2^34, loop bound is 'long'
Your condition 'i < loops' will always be true.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
SO and our very own QA could well be viewed like this[^].
|
|
|
|
|
That is so true! It happens all the time. Btw, their leading Griff has 34M points ; I wonder if Jon Skeet would ever take a snapshot like that.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
"Highly paid, competitive benefits; that one language you didn't learn" (lower right)
Just everything about that picture is funny
|
|
|
|
|
Not very realistic....the problem wasn't urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
What about:
"This question makes no sense and by answering you have shown your complete lack of understanding. I have voted 1. Please see my alternative answer."
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Edited two years after it was posted by "Grammar Nazi" - Brilliant!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously. I have encountered so many nonsensical posts here at Code Project, it either makes my LMAO or it makes my cry. Why doesn't some genius at CodeProject design a filtering algorithm that decides if the post first resembles ANY form of intelligence? I am certain that the mediators would love this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
The first thing they will do is tag and remove any post that contains more than one emoticon.
|
|
|
|
|
That's me out then...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I see you figured it out... Pete it's time to change plans!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
I refer you to the following line at the top of this page:
"For lazing about and discussing anything in a software developer's life that takes your fancy except programming questions"
Not everything in the Lounge needs to be serious or "intelligent". Some lazing about and talking nonsense is allowed!
|
|
|
|
|
That's just the Lounge. I have a feeling he means QA.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh! But then he should have said so.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't trying to be serious, but I do try to demonstrate intelligence on a regular basis. Mostly my post was intended as a joke, since I don't think it would be possible to ever design an algorithm that could accurately evict nonsensical posts!
|
|
|
|
|
No, we can't detect intelligence, but we can certainly go the other way
Have the geniuses at CP give us a choice of which filter to send our post through before posting.. valspeak, pig latin, Swedish chef.. the possibilities are endless.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on where the post is: most visitors don't realise that QA isn't for answers, it's an intelligence test. Post a question, and it gets sent to all future employers as part of the interview process.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
If that were printed at the top of every QA page, the problem would be 72% resolved!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Really? That is interesting. So there's a bunch of people on CodeProject being vetted by employers. You're right. I did not realize that. It sure explains why there are so many posts written by people that can barely communicate in English.
|
|
|
|
|
CP would be empty pretty soon
|
|
|
|
|
My thought exactly!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|