|
When you talk about international commerce, global politics comes into play, and the result can be anything but fair.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah this one is a genuine answer
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
BupeChombaDerrick wrote: Maybe if you could clarify a little bit about how taxes work on either side
The only thing I can clarify is how I would get taxed in my country, when selling or purchasing, but that would be useless to you. I have no idea how Google would be taxed in my country, yours, or their, nor I know how you would be taxed in your country.
And you purchasing apps via credit card and receive payments via wired transfer, which are covered by different sets of law in your country, probably.
So I guess tax laws, bank regulations and Google interests do not add up in case of your country.
BupeChombaDerrick wrote: if a Google merchant account can't support a particular country then purchasing should not be supported as well in that country
That would be crazy, there's much more people buying apps then selling them. Why should overwhelming majority of customers be blocked from using one important feature of the store/market, just because minority cannot use some other feature due to external obstacles? That's not my vision of fair, or sane. I know it sucks you cannot sell apps, but your idea of fair does not hold water in this case.
modified 8-Apr-15 19:05pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: I have no idea how Google would be taxed in my country, yours, or their,
Neither do most taxing agents, so many countries are trying to work out how to tax these buggers it is not funny.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah no wonder Google play is heavily suppressed in regions like China.
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: Why should overwhelming majority of customers be blocked from using one important feature of the store/market, just because minority cannot use some other feature due to external obstacles?
Google is innovative enough to overcome those "external obstacles", plus the expansion of Google play merchant account is too slow for Google. Given the global share that Android has concerning mobile devices, it makes sense for Google to support all countries, and consider even the minority developers in those countries.
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
Are you suggesting that they have magic stick or that they should bribe the government?
We had similar case here with PayPal. Central bank was refusing, for years, to update regulation to allow PayPal-like services. Only year or two ago they finally done that, but receiving money is still not possible (IIRC). It might not be the case for Zambia, but I also doubt it's Google causing the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Mladen Janković wrote: Are you suggesting that they have magic stick or that they should bribe the government?
No, Admob from Google does support Zambia, they can send money to me if I'am using Admob so why can't I just sell apps? This is because the kind of app I'am creating might be better monetized with in-app purchases than ads. Paypal works here as well, but not Google merchant account.
I also feel that if Google merchant account expands it would improve the general quality of the store itself, a win-win situation on either side. 
“Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”
|
|
|
|
|
The spam/abusive message click should have a way for the recipient to say "Same To You" as the real possible abuse could be (and others have so noted) the one who clicked to begin with. At least when it's for no apparent reason at all. http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5037259/Re-Google-EU-and-B.aspx[^]
I've been have an "intense discussion" w/another CP'ian and neither of us click the button. It's just, in a way, too easy.
Against my normal thoughts, maybe such clicking should be reserved for the 'super users' - even if I lose the button, myself. Just so it has some meaning.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
When you let children play where adults congregate there's bound to be problems.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm offended by that; where's that report button...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Now Now Now, have we taken out meds today? 
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm even more offended by that! I must seek out every post you have ever made and abuse report them all! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah...well your cat's so fat only two legs touch the ground at the same time. 
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, yo mama so fat she's on both sides of the family.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'm taking my ball and going to the house. (Stomps feet and walks away)
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have you eventually celebrated your 1,234,567 rep points ?
|
|
|
|
|
No, I was busy yesterday and missed it! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm offended that I am offended at your offense. 
|
|
|
|
|
I rarely use the spam/abuse option, but, having said that, I have used it.
Within 'The Lounge', certain topics are supposed to be avoided, but, people being what they are, post what they want anyway.
For the most part, I will ignore their posts, however, if spelling is changed to avoid filters, but the pronunciation and meaning remain and are offensive, then, yes, the spam/abuse option will be used.
Some people have been banned because of their choice of words and then their ban is rescinded and their general abuse continues. So... the option is used again.
While I would like to address them directly about WHY I voted as I did, I suspect it would result in a barrage of abuse directed specifically at me and then the 'revenge' factor would be played to ban me as well.
So... how do you proceed?
|
|
|
|
|
So your personal taste in word usage is more important than other people's right to communicate within a forum that you do not own.
Interesting.
Note that "abuse" is not concerned with your preferences in word usage, but to abuse of the forum or its members.
I would classify denying members their right to communicate within the forum (that you do not own) as abusive toward those members, and would posit that they should have the right to respond to your abusive behaviour.
You should know that until I read your posting, I was against the idea in the OP, because of the potential for schoolyard fights.
If it helps expose hidden abusive behaviour, however, then I can only come out in favour of it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I do not own the site.
The site has rules as stated in each forum.
Disregarded the rules is abuse of the site.
The author and owner has provided a feedback mechanism to report such.
People have taken to using 'elephanting' and 'sunshine' in place of other words that are considered unacceptable in this forum. The word I took exception to was along the same lines.
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that you object to a word used by another human being does not give you the right to attempt to harm him or his reputation.
What kind of world would it be if everyone behaved like that?
A sh*tty, crappy, f***ing horrible world, that's what kind.
You do not own the site, and you do not own the English language, so do not assume that you are allowed to control either.
Try looking for ways to make the day better, not more miserable. The abuse option is to prevent abuse, not to prevent discussion.
Don't abuse your fellow members by telling what they are and are not allowed to say.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you petty little wanker. I can't believe that I'm wasting my free moments on morons like this.
Tim Carmichael wrote: The author and owner has provided a feedback mechanism to report such.
Yes, it's called "writing a message".
"Abuse" is another thing altogether.
Using the abuse system because someone says things that you don't like or uses words that you don't like is:
- Abuse of the abuse system.
- Abuse of the forums
- Abuse of the laws of the country that you live in.
You Do Not Have The Right To Tell Anyone What They Are Allowed, Or Not Allowed, To Say.
Go live in Stalin's Russia, if that's the life you want to live.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
