|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: I wonder why this doesn't interest you?
They are claiming there is water without actually seeing or finding water. I can understand how that excites you but it does not me.
The knowledge we have is miniscule compared to the available knowledge and yet we continue to box everything we learn into the tiny bit that we feel comfortable believing that we know.
There are a million different possible explanations for what they found. Water is the most obvious and therefore, the least interesting of them all.
You can't tell me that you wouldn't be more excited to see chocolate milk falls rather than waterfalls. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: They are claiming there is water without actually seeing or finding water.
They don't need to see the water: they deduce its presence from other observations. Not sure why you don't get that. [sarcasm]
RyanDev wrote: There are a million different possible explanations for what they found.
and those would be?
RyanDev wrote: You can't tell me that you wouldn't be more excited to see chocolate milk falls rather than waterfalls.
That would be something out of a Douglas Adams novel, not reality!
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: and those would be?
Chocolate milk for starters. Why doesn't that excite you?
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: not reality!
You're proving my point. There is no scientific reason that it could not be chocolate milk falls. You are boxing in the possibilities based on the tiny bit of knowledge that you have. Sorry, not exciting for me.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: and the other 999,999?
Yes.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Look, I've told you a gazillion times not to exaggerate and there you go, doing for the 4125364758th time.
Seriously, if your best objection is it could or should be chocolate milk then you clearly either don't or won't understand or enjoy the discovery and what it might mean.
Unless, of course, there is some religious objection to finding water and the possible consequence of that... dun-dun-dah...
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: if your best objection is it could or should be chocolate milk then you clearly either don't
If you thought that was my objection then you clearly did not understand my point.
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: religious objection to finding water
 When you already know that there are countless planets like ours that have people living on them, finding water on one planet is not that engaging.
However, I took my kids to the fair Saturday and my 6 year old just loved the simplest rides. Smiled from ear to ear. We get excited based on our experiences. It would be great to be excited by simple things again, I admit.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: If you thought that was my objection then you clearly did not understand my point.
a) you went on about and said it was one of a million possibilities. What, like sherbet dip?
b) I got your point. It was a poor one made poorer by chocolate milk. At least it should have been malted.
RyanDev wrote: When you already know that there are countless planets like ours that have people living on them, finding water on one planet is not that engaging.
Do you have some evidence of that?
RyanDev wrote: I took my kids to the fair Saturday and my 6 year old just loved the simplest rides.
Simple is as simple does.
RyanDev wrote: It would be great to be excited by simple things again, I admit.
Then stop being so dogmatic. Put aside your irrationality and come back to the light side, where science is real whether you believe it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: I got your point.
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: Put aside your irrationality and come back to the light side, where science is real whether you believe it or not.
Now you're proving that you did not understand my point. I think it's a bit beyond your grasp.
TTYL. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I think it's a bit beyond your grasp.
That is, of course, a possibility. In this case, though, it isn't. You just prove how little you understand of science and have yet to answer any of the questions I posed, instead choosing to do a madge. Weak, very weak.
|
|
|
|
|
"Thank you, NASA"
~ Matt Damon et al.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
We haven't day one since Thursday, and todays is a cracker!
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html[^]
I just didn't want you to miss it. The only downside is I can't find a high res version for use as a desktop - 1200x800 is the highest I can find. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No problem: I would not have posted this as I usually only post deep space images unless it is something very special. The moon is not special. 
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: The moon is not special
But..but..the blood moon is the harbinger of the Apocralypse! Murican Sky Pixie Fanciers said so!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But..but..the blood moon is the harbinger of the Apocralypse! Murican Sky Pixie Fanciers said so!
Haha.
Asimov postulated that life exists on this planet specifically because of the presence of the moon[^] so, I suppose, in that respect, it could be considered a tad important but it is just a ball of rock that makes up the binary system upon which we find ourselves trapped.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen other speculations that the presence of the moon is directly responsible for life evolving in the direction it did: for starters it slowed the early Earth's rotation from a 12 hour day to it's current value. With that short a day, temperatures would be wildly different, plants would be very different, and the weather would be a lot less regular and (semi)predictable. That we would have evolved to appreciate it is very unlikely!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The moon actually protects us from numerous large objects that might've otherwise hit Earth.
The moon is a great shield.
|
|
|
|
|
newton.saber wrote: The moon is a great shield.
It needs to be bigger...[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know - it sure looks like a UFO to me. 
|
|
|
|
|
Do Grammarians have a lot of comma sense?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Only when it comes to their colons.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
This raises an interesting question... What is a semi-colonoscopy?
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
That's when the patient runs away when he sees the size of the camera.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Or when they see the apostrophe and decide they can only afford a smaller test.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
