|
GuyThiebaut wrote: The best developer is a lazy programmer
The laziest always find the easiest way to get it done
GuyThiebaut wrote: Why keep banging your head against a wall when they are alternative ways of doing things such as using google?
Don't forget the QA and "gimme code plzzz, it's urgent"
GuyThiebaut wrote: As if a developer has any time to take on anything else.
Did you forget coffee, bacon and beer?
 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
GuyThiebaut wrote: The best developer is a lazy programmer
Agreed (and on the rest), and that's the thing, I answered the questions based not just on context but the lessons learned over 35+ years of programming.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Good points well made, definitely not appropriate questions to ask a developer!
Developers don't work like the other meat sacks. Our brains have been repeatedly smashed by trying to solve the riddles of obscure programming languages and code written by others...
Er, I can't think of a funny signature right now.
How about a good fart to break the silence?
|
|
|
|
|
Remind me not to socialize with you in the future, you seem to be a negative influence 
Seriously though, in this case it's not you (well not entirely) who suffers from this test.
Suppose you were a serious candidate and this company rejects you based on these test results.
The company just missed a major opportunity!
I had something just like it once.
A company I wanted to buy from wouldn't sell me their product because somehow some financial bureau decided I was not worthy of credit!
I am a lot, but I've never missed a payment in my life 
The company missed out on revenue and I shopped somewhere else.
Later I found out that it was because I just moved and the person who lived in the house before I did was a notorious defaulter... So all they really did was an address check, absurd! 
|
|
|
|
|
My God! You must've gotten my results...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
modified 20-Jan-16 12:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Low energy, can't be president.
it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it reflected the state of mind you had at the time, and you weren’t really interested in the job to start with when you took the said stupid test.
|
|
|
|
|
ledtech3 wrote: Perhaps it reflected the state of mind you had at the time, and you weren’t really interested in the job to start with when you took the said stupid test.
No, I answered the questions quite honestly -- not just honestly, but based on real world experience. So, when there's a question like "you are happy to drop what you are doing and immediately help a coworker that is having a problem", my answer was "disagree", because it depends on what I'm doing, and whether the coworker can figure it out on their own and learn something, but they're just asking me because they know I know the answer (happens all the time!)
But because I "disagree", I'm now marked as an antisocial cretin.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I think i would have had to dissagree with that one too.
That is not a yes/no question, it is a "It Depends" question.
|
|
|
|
|
Was this for an interview at Capital One by chance? Looks pretty much like the same stupid SAT-like test they expected me to take. I refused.
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music."
-- Marcus Brigstocke, British Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you were applying to some unionized civil service department.
The questions I remember (resource industry) were:
- Do you prefer a clean desk or looking at a pretty girl
- How much do you drink per week
Don't remember the rest, but got the job.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it just funny how ASP.NET just showed off everything in their first or second week? I mean, I was myself very much eager to try out the new things in ASP.NET 5, however, I did write a few articles and blogs when I was sharing "how-tos" on CodeProject etc.
Now, team has said that ASP.NET 5 is dead and well, ASP.NET Core 1.0, .NET Core 1.0 are available and they would be used.
ASP.NET 5 is dead - Introducing ASP.NET Core 1.0 and .NET Core 1.0 - Scott Hanselman[^]
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
That's a misleading headline. A more accurate headline would be: ASP.NET 5 renamed to ASP.NET Core 1.0
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
But the suspense is gone. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Richard, correct. 
|
|
|
|
|
OP was just reusing the lesser Scott's heading.
|
|
|
|
|
I know, but that doesn't change the fact it's misleading.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, I was trying to exonerate OP of the faux pas.
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I prefer to involve myself with the gritty details of low level programming - the lower the level the happier I am. Staying on top of the web / platform independent framework looks like a rabbit chase, where we are the running dogs and the rabbit is a lie.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
May I ask what industry you work in? I'm also more interested in low level programming than web development, but all the jobs I see are for ASP.NET MVC.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial machines. In my specific case I work both on image processing to detect foreign materials in food, beverage and pharmaceutical products and on the connection of the elaboration to all the components, like X-Ray generators (usually controlled by RS-232 or RS-485), X-Ray detectors and associated acquisition boards, PLCs of various kinds (depend on what the customer has), I/O boards, Modbus equipment of various kinds, inverters...
We use a standard Windows PC, develop mainly in C++ while the UI is VB6 (next major version will be C# hopefully) and the occasional SSE functions for repeated and intensive computations (applying Gauss filtering, chromatical normalization, rotations...).
The UI needs very little tricks as it must work with resistive touchscreens due to the usage of rubber gloves, and must be reliable so that clumsy movements would not cause troubles (like involountarily turning on the X-ray source or the belt or the parameters for the inspection).
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: ASP.NET Core 1.0...doesn't yet have Web Pages
Yep, they're very different! I'll wait for 2.0. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Article: Naming is hard
Anyone else remember when they chose "asp.net" and your boss thought that moving their sites from classic asp to asp.net would be a simple task cos "They're almost the same thing"
|
|
|
|
|
Those would be the same bosses who thought that moving from VB6 to VB.NET would just mean recompiling the code. After all, it's still "VB". 
And because they thought that was happening, some influential customers made sure that VB.NET kept a whole raft of dross from VB6 for "compatibility" reasons. Things like: non-short-circuiting boolean operators; declaring arrays by specifying the upper bound, instead of the number of items; and the abyss that is "On Error".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
