|
Great, I'm gald it helped. 
|
|
|
|
|
ledtech3 wrote: I'm gald it helped
Helped?
You've allowed onedrive back into the poor boy's life! How is that helping?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Haha! Not only is it back, I've paid for extra storage (1.99 for 50GB). More than I need (today) for images and documents. If I get to the point where that isn't enough I can get 1TB. Seems to be as good as any other cloud storage app.
It seems to work pretty well and may put my NAS drive out of business. 
|
|
|
|
|
Election Fraud - YouTube[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
This is why no-one really considered possible of Scotland vote to leave, government wasn't afraid
This also why they cried that Crimea vote "unauthorized", because it hasn't use those machine 
|
|
|
|
|
The Scottish vote used the same method as all other UK votes. Paper and pencil! The Government was afraid enough to promise all manner of things (some of which they've even had to implement) in the final week of the campaign.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
In the video was paper too...
|
|
|
|
|
But the "paper" isn't fed through a counting machine in the UK. The votes are counted manually with many eyes watching the process.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Guys,
I am sorry. I was not check the info.
|
|
|
|
|
In my community, at least, the papers don't go through a shredder. They actually allow for a recount.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Who mentioned shredders? 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
He probably just flipped the read-only slider on the memory card, so the counting machine could only read back what he'd entered earlier.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: so the counting machine could only read back what he'd entered earlier.
But the power-on process verified that there were 0 votes initially on the memory card.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno. I completely lost interest in it, and stopped paying attention.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is a clip from the documentary Hacking Democracy (2006)[^]. I'm going to try to get it from my local library.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have been against computer voting since before it got loose.
My reasoning is that self modifying code can be written that would work absolutely accurately until a certain event occurs (date, time, and vote-count) and then start miscounting votes at a leisurely pace for a while - the that part of the code modifies itself so it cannot be traced. That's just one route. That, and the quick pick of Dibold, a company with strong political connections, was rather suspicious.
But the real reason we're doomed, of course, is that with about 370 million of us, the best candidates they could come up with are what we got running in these primaries. Only the fact that we've witnessed that we could elect a talking head for president and the country still rolls along. That some politicos would take stands that they know will hurt the country just to make their point (=throw their fit) - that's where the danger lies.
Yeah - I guess you should worry.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
So how did they do it?
(and frankly, if this were done to ensure Trump didn't win, I wouldn't mind!)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: frankly, if this were done to ensure Trump didn't win, I wouldn't mind!
Yup.
Everyone's in favour of cheating if it means that their team wins -- but screams bloody murder if the other team wins by cheating.
People suck, that's all there is to it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Everyone's in favour of cheating if it means that their team wins
When it comes to politics, I don't have team I vote for, sadly it's usually a team I vote against.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Yet more evidence that party politics is in no way related to democracy.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Well.. at the risk of turning this into a soapbox discussion, the real fraud is that so-called voter-fraud is being sold as a problem in order to justify new voter registration laws whose sole purpose is to disenfranchise as much of the poor and black vote as possible. Voter fraud is not a problem; never has been and never will be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems a local football (soccer) club has practiced their new innovative trick, the encrypted shot.
By playing encrypted shots to their team members they hope the ball won't be intercepted by other (opposing) players.
It would take 312 years for the opponent to intercept a shot to the forward players, if they even notice the ball was kicked at all.
Spectators will probably need to get used to not seeing the team play, but at least their shot-system is now waterproof.
It's from a Dutch satirical "news" website.
For the Dutchies: Spelers Cambuur gaan encrypted passes verzenden - De Speld[^]
|
|
|
|
|
This doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
