Click here to Skip to main content
15,901,283 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
GeneralRe: Euro 2016 Pin
R. Giskard Reventlov8-Jun-16 12:51
R. Giskard Reventlov8-Jun-16 12:51 
GeneralRe: Euro 2016 Pin
Michael Martin9-Jun-16 1:04
professionalMichael Martin9-Jun-16 1:04 
GeneralRe: Euro 2016 Pin
R. Giskard Reventlov9-Jun-16 4:46
R. Giskard Reventlov9-Jun-16 4:46 
JokeRe: Euro 2016 Pin
Richard Deeming9-Jun-16 2:10
mveRichard Deeming9-Jun-16 2:10 
GeneralMichael Martin should be happy Pin
OriginalGriff8-Jun-16 7:26
mveOriginalGriff8-Jun-16 7:26 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
90823658-Jun-16 8:19
90823658-Jun-16 8:19 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
OriginalGriff8-Jun-16 8:49
mveOriginalGriff8-Jun-16 8:49 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
90823658-Jun-16 10:49
90823658-Jun-16 10:49 
Yeah, but ...

All of those scenarios are trumped by the actual decision of the tribunal. They say she didn't know, that she did not intentionally take a performance enhancing drug with a view to gaining advantage. The only thing they're pinging her for is not having someone vet the medicine that she was taking and even that's a bit shaky because if, as they say, she wasn't to know that the newly banned substance was an ingredient, why would she have reviewed something that she had been taking for years without the slightest problem? What actually occurred is, at this stage, irrelevant because the tribunal has determined that scenario 3 in your list is what happened. So they have declared her 'not guilty' of the actual charge yet they are punishing her anyway on the grounds of a procedural failure with which she wasn't charged. Moreover that punishment is not in line with the international standards for such cases taking into account that this is a first offence and according to the tribunal on a lesser offence. The CAS has, I think, no choice but to determine that that is unfair and vacate the decision.

I actually don't have a problem with believing that she has been playing with a heart condition at all. It is not at all unusual for athletes to develop heart conditions* and many of those have not been diagnosed until long after they retired. Famously there are a number of cases where the first and only 'symptom' has been dropping dead! If they stayed in competition not knowing they had a problem then why should someone who has been diagnosed and received appropriate treatment be less able to do so? Frankly sport would more or less cease altogether if everything wrong with athletes was to be considered career ending! They may be fit but they're not healthy!

* A European Society of Cardiology study of more than 2000 athletes eligible for the summer and winter Olympic games and screened for cardiovascular health revealed an unexpectedly high prevalence of cardiovascular conditions, some of which were considered as very serious threats to health.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Roger Wright8-Jun-16 19:28
professionalRoger Wright8-Jun-16 19:28 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
OriginalGriff8-Jun-16 20:40
mveOriginalGriff8-Jun-16 20:40 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Nish Nishant8-Jun-16 9:29
sitebuilderNish Nishant8-Jun-16 9:29 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
OriginalGriff8-Jun-16 9:37
mveOriginalGriff8-Jun-16 9:37 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
PompeyThree8-Jun-16 9:57
PompeyThree8-Jun-16 9:57 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
pkfox8-Jun-16 11:24
professionalpkfox8-Jun-16 11:24 
JokeRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
ChandraRam9-Jun-16 22:32
ChandraRam9-Jun-16 22:32 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Joe Woodbury8-Jun-16 13:34
professionalJoe Woodbury8-Jun-16 13:34 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Maximilien8-Jun-16 16:13
Maximilien8-Jun-16 16:13 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Joe Woodbury8-Jun-16 18:07
professionalJoe Woodbury8-Jun-16 18:07 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
90823659-Jun-16 1:05
90823659-Jun-16 1:05 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Mark H28-Jun-16 20:27
Mark H28-Jun-16 20:27 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
90823659-Jun-16 0:54
90823659-Jun-16 0:54 
GeneralRe: Michael Martin should be happy Pin
Michael Martin9-Jun-16 1:07
professionalMichael Martin9-Jun-16 1:07 
GeneralThought of the day PinPopular
OriginalGriff8-Jun-16 4:50
mveOriginalGriff8-Jun-16 4:50 
GeneralRe: Thought of the day Pin
RUs1238-Jun-16 4:56
RUs1238-Jun-16 4:56 
GeneralRe: Thought of the day Pin
W Balboos, GHB8-Jun-16 5:00
W Balboos, GHB8-Jun-16 5:00 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.


Straw Poll

Were you affected by the geomagnetic storms this past weekend?
Communication disruptions, electrified pipes, random unexplained blue-screens in Windows - the list of effects is terrifying.
  Results   504 votes