|
|
Thanks. Will take a look
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, just used that here. Works well.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I just downloaded the source. There's a whole bunch of source files. This seems WAY too complicated.
I'll spend some time looking at it, but I'm turned off already.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that sucks. You might want to look at the library Nish and others have pointed out then, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
I use edtftpnet. docs say secure is available though I haven't tried it. After moving to 10, I lost the ability to use my ftp client of choice (ws_ftp pro) and after trying a few free ones, decided to write my own. The edtftpnet library is well documented and easy to use.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
I have a demo of their Pro class. Works nice but they want $300 for the DLL and another $600 for the code.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I have their Client app. Works nice. Is the assembly secure FTP?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Is the assembly secure FTP?
Yes, see their example :
C# example[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Do you know if the source is available?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't know about that.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the source is available on their site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I ended up writing my own FTP class in C# way back in around 2009 and I still use the same code to this day. It's not that difficult to write FTP, and if you have specific requirements then it's a no-brainer.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
I think he is referring to SFTP, which I think is a little less intuitive then writing straight FTP stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is "secure FTP"? Everyone here is talking like they know what it means.
What's wrong with data encryption? Password protected zip files?
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: Everyone here is talking like they know what it means.
Maybe that's because we do...
Secure FTP is when the data is encrypted before transmission. Why do through extra step of zipping a file when the SFTP class can encrypt it for you?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
And you need to "find" a class first to do that?
|
|
|
|
|
Why not?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, there is something to be said for having the "data at rest" encrypted.
But there is also something to be said for not having your FTP credentials flying across the wire in the clear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
