|
dnftt
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure where you are but not given reason and not paid leave I'd contact the local govt agency (i.e. 'manpower ministry', 'dept of labor') even if to ask their advice
(and hopefully send a good strong 'fark you' back at the people screwing you over.)
If it's really as you've stated, what they are doing is pretty much illegal everywhere. (Even in the case of employee negligence/illegal act or employer going into receivership a reason must be given.)
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Christian, you've certainly been missed around here. Sounds like your (ex-)employer needs a visit from a smart lawyer.
BTW you may like to take a deep breath and a strong drink before venturing into the murky waters of QA these days.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice having you back here... ![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
Sorry for that job issue... ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
I'm sure you'll get something new soon, but anyway, even it could be for good, changes are always scary...
|
|
|
|
|
Yo! Waasaaaaa CG! How you doin'? Damn, looks like you on grind but gonna get betta doe.
We all talk like cool teens now. 
Sorry about the firing thing. I hope your legal system takes care of that.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Sucks when this happens, especially when no one phones you to tell you why, at least then you might understand, but just to get an email, its a kick in the guts, especially when you have worked your arse off for the firm and made them LOADS of money.
Still, its just time to move on to a new contract!
Anyway, hows the guitar going? Did you ever learn sweep picking?
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome back CG, was thinking of you just the other day wondering how you were fairing.
Sorry to hear you got canned but that usually means another, better door is about to open.
Hope you and yours have a good holiday season.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
I know that feeling. Been there myself. My wife got the same treatment last year two weeks before Christmas.
Sorry to hear. 
|
|
|
|
|
Name and shame on Jan 3. Were you in tassie or the US? I can imagine local coding jobs would be rather scarce, good luck in the new year.
These guys are looking for someone Maatsuyker Island: Volunteers wanted [^], pay may be crap though but you should be used to the conditions.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Yikes CG - sounds like you need a chat with WorkCover - I hope you & the family manage a good Xmas & New Year
|
|
|
|
|
Garth J Lancaster wrote: Yikes CG - sounds like you need a chat with WorkCover - I hope you & the family manage a good Xmas & New Year
Yankee employers.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
bvgger/elephanting sh*ts .. forgot he was working for them
|
|
|
|
|
hey
I have not been on here a lot... but the last I remember, were you not working for yourself?
Anyway... good luck for the future
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: with no payout of leave entitlement
WTF? That's not legal, I thought. If you have vacation time accrued, they need to pay you for it.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Know how it feels, see ya in the PUB? 
|
|
|
|
|
We're under snow and ice. So...same as usual, really.
That totally sucks about the Random Act of Management. What's next? How's the family?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: So I figured I'd drop in on old friends.
All 12,5 million+ of them? 
Not the most happy news, but you could see it as an opportunity for something better ...
|
|
|
|
|
Long time no see here. That sucks! Hope you find out at the exit interview.
|
|
|
|
|
Random Thought of the Day:
Why did the developers of System.Collections.Concurrent name it concurrent? Many leading books about concurrency define it simply as a non-strictly-synchronous execution environment generally focused on responsiveness (could be asynchronous or parallel). It does not imply or require parallelism which the concurrent classes address 
EDIT: I see the flaw in my assumption as stated below. Just a random thought I had at 2am and hadn't considered some cases
modified 18-Dec-16 14:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I mean... you can literally just do a google for it if you really wanted to answer that question yourself. Rob Pike has mentioned it in talks, Stephen Cleary mentions it in Concurrency in C# iirc, Joseph Albahari recognizes the distinction in Threading in C# by referring to parallelism as "genuine concurrency" implying a subset, etc. Even the wiki you linked to agrees that concurrency is a more general term that can involve things such as time-slicing, asynchronicity (yielding time-slices), and parallelism.
I do see the flaw in my statement now though. While parallelism I think is the worst offender by far and general time-slicing the least offender due to time-slices being relatively long - it is still possible to run into issues.
modified 18-Dec-16 14:59pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Jon McKee wrote: I mean... you can literally just do a google for it if you really wanted to answer that question yourself.
That would be a nice reply for about 90% of every question here, including the one we started with.
In short, it is the most appropriate name as that is what would be expected. The name might not be entirely accurate but that is of lower importance.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
If you had addressed my initial question this would be a relevant reply. However, you explicitly went after my references which are easily validated via Google. Also my initial question is not easily solved via Google as time-slicing (a subset of concurrency) is only relevant if data-sharing between processes is taking place. This is not as trivial as it would initially seem as processes have their own address-space 
|
|
|
|
|
Just put some very complicated code together and it works, perfectly, first time, in a very time critical event driven fashion, real time, without error.
Sometimes it just comes together, and you think, damn, that actually works like its supposed to. Doesn't happen much in the MSFT world! 
modified 16-Dec-16 20:19pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
